Affordances of Virtual and Physical Laboratory Projects for Instructional Design: Impacts on Student Engagement
Abstract
Contribution: Student engagement and interest in engineering is compared between virtual and physical laboratory projects, designed to be realistic and replicate engineering practice. Reported motivation and engagement was greater in the virtual project than the physical projects. Results are interpreted in terms of the different affordances for instructional design using physical and virtual laboratories. Background: Interest is increasing in incorporating virtual laboratories in engineering curricula. Numerous studies report equal or greater gains in students' conceptual understanding in a virtual laboratory than a corresponding physical laboratory, but many researchers question if virtual laboratories can stimulate the same level of excitement for engineering as physical laboratories. Research Questions: Do students' self-reports of interest in engineering depend on the instructional design afforded by the laboratory mode? How do instructional designs of virtual and physical laboratory projects relate to students' perceptions of engagement, their contribution to the team, and the transfer of prior coursework to meet project objectives? Method: In a within-subjects design, 118 students' interest and engagement in two physical laboratory projects and one of two virtual laboratory projects in a senior-year capstone course is investigated. Separate principal components analyses were used to develop reliable scales for interest and for engagement. Findings: Students reported gr…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Implementing virtual laboratories positively impacts students' learning processes and engages them to repeat and conduct safe experiments independently throughout practical courses.
“For instance, the implementation of virtual laboratories has positively impacted students' learning processes and engaged them to repeat and conduct safe experiments independently throughout practical courses (Nolen and Koretsky 2018).”
From Incorporating Computational Thinking Into Virtual Laboratories to Enhance Learning Motivation, Engagement, and Higher‐Order Thinking Skills (2025) · cites this paper as Nolen and Koretsky 2018
Cites
Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.105 · Cited by 756 · see citing works
Improving biotech education through gamified laboratory simulations
Bonde, M. T., Makransky, G., Wandall, J., Larsen, M. V., Morsing, M., Jarmer, H., & Sommer, M. O. A. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2955 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2022) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers11020018 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Wu, T., Sarwono, E., & Huang, Y. (2025) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.70017 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nolen, S. B., & Koretsky, M. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Oregon State University (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Education
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 226-233
- ISSN
- 0018-9359 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9638
- OpenAlex
- W2794021795
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 5.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (DRL 1251264, DRL 1251866)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Experimental Learning in Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Engineering Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
- Keywords
- virtual laboratory, physical laboratory, student engagement, engineering interest, instructional design, student motivation, prior knowledge transfer, team contribution, engineering education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review