Cited by 756Education, Achievement, and GiftednessPsychological and Educational Research StudiesMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance.

Harackiewicz, Judith M., Durik, Amanda M., Barron, Kenneth E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, Lisa, Tauer, John M.·2008·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

The dynamics of individual and situational interest and academic performance were examined in the college classroom and 7 semesters later in conjunction with achievement goals. At the beginning of an introductory psychology course, participants reported their initial interest in psychology, achievement goals, and situational interest in course lectures. At the end of the semester, participants (N = 858) reported their situational interest in course lectures and psychology. In the short term, relationships emerged among initial interest, achievement goals, situational interest, and class performance. Longitudinally, situational interest during the introductory course, independent of initial interest, predicted subsequent course choices. Results are discussed in terms of S. Hidi and K. A. Renninger's (2006) 4-phase model of interest development and the multiple goals model (J. M. Harackiewicz, K. E. Barron, P. R. Pintrich, A. J. Elliot, & T. M. Thrash, 2002).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.105

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Much research on the reciprocity between motivation and achievement has been done with data collected at large time intervals, reflecting changes over months or years.

    “Another gap in the literature that we identified is that much research on the reciprocity between motivation and achievement has been done with data collected at large time intervals, which reflect changes that happen over months or years (e.g., Harackiewicz et al., 2008;Marsh et al., 2005Marsh et al., , 2016;;Nuutila et al., 2018).”

    From Motivation-Achievement Cycles in Learning: a Literature Review and Research Agenda (2022) · cites this paper as Harackiewicz et al., 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Northern Illinois University (US)
  • James Madison University (US)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2008-02
Volume
100
Issue
1
Pages
105-122
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2170964199
Cited by
756
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 40
FWCI
24.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • UST Research Online (University of St. Thomas - Minnesota) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
achievement goals, interest development, situational interest, academic performance, course selection, introductory psychology course, longitudinal development, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review