The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clarifying the Integration of Trust and TAM in E-Commerce Environments: Implications for Systems Design and Management
Abstract
Two dominant theories—trust and technology acceptance—have been employed in numerous information systems research studies to help understand consumer behavior in e-commerce environments. In this context of voluntary Web site adoption and use, we provide a more precise understanding of the nomological network related to the cognitive variables (both beliefs and attitudes) that precede this use. Designers and engineers need to be concerned not just with building an objectively better Web site but also with building a Web site that conveys desirable characteristics. Although the theory of reasoned action has been acknowledged as the underlying theory for technology acceptance and some trust research, past studies integrating these two theories have omitted important variables from their models and have posited different causal relationships among model variables. This research argues for the reinclusion and/or clarification of belief and attitude constructs relevant to technology acceptance and trust research streams, explains why these constructs are critical for understanding causality in such models, proposes an integration model that is consistent with this argument, and finally tests this model in a context exploring initial reactions to an e-vendor and evaluates the relative importance of trust and technology acceptance variables in predicting user intentions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I. (1985) · Action Control · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 · Cited by 19,057
A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.83 · Cited by 9,406
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model1
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036519 · Cited by 8,635
An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment
Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378802500207 · Cited by 6,293
Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace 1
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x · Cited by 6,231 · cited 1×
“Workplace technology acceptance studies that empirically validated the omission of technology attitude suggest that the motivation to use a technology results from beliefs about its potential to increase job performance [ 27 ].”
Background(2003) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275 · Cited by 5,715
Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology
McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81 · Cited by 5,550
Cited by
Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures
Mcknight, D. H., Carter, M., Thatcher, J. B., & Clay, P. F. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems · doi:10.1145/1985347.1985353 · Cited by 1,185
An empirical examination of continuance intention of mobile payment services
Zhou, T. (2013) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.10.034 · Cited by 914
The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public’s acceptance of automated vehicles
Zhang, T., Tao, D., Qu, X., Zhang, X., Lin, R., & Zhang, W. (2019) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.018 · Cited by 837
An empirical examination of initial trust in mobile banking
Zhou, T. (2011) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/10662241111176353 · Cited by 589
Consumer attitude and intention to adopt mobile wallet in India – An empirical study
Chawla, D., & Joshi, H. (2019) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijbm-09-2018-0256 · Cited by 518
Metadata
- Authors
- Benamati, J., Fuller, M. A., Serva, M. A., & Baroudi, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 380-393
- ISSN
- 0018-9391 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0040
- OpenAlex
- W2129817769
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 18.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clarifying the Integration of Trust and TAM in E-Commerce Environments: Implications for Systems Design and Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tem.2009.2023111
- The paper
- Benamati, J., Fuller, M. A., Serva, M. A., & Baroudi, J. (2010). Clarifying the Integration of Trust and TAM in E-Commerce Environments: Implications for Systems Design and Management. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2009.2023111
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.