The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Green New Product Development: The Pivotal Role of Product Greenness
Open accessAbstract
This study aims to develop an integrative framework for green new product development (NPD) based on the existing literature and to empirically study the applicability of that integrative framework. This study answers three calls: for research that is rooted in a traditional NPD perspective, for research that integrates marketing aspects in a model of green NPD, and for research that acknowledges variations in greenness. The results from eight case studies in two industries (i.e., the chemical and food industries) substantiate the integrative framework and suggest that it provides a good basis for understanding green NPD. The study demonstrates that green NPD is not fundamentally different from traditional NPD but does contain features and underlying mechanisms that reflect the increased complexity of green NPD. The framework incorporates the targeting and positioning of green product innovations, thus establishing itself as a holistic framework. Most importantly, the study shows how greenness plays a pivotal role in tying the various elements of the framework together. The realized greenness of a new product is a central concept that helps managers understand complex relationships among industry type, green targeting, and green positioning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103 · cited 1×
“Such researcher triangulation [29] minimizes the chance of bias when data are collected by one respondent and serves as a preliminary case analysis [38].”
MethodProduct development: Past research, present findings and future directions
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258850 · Cited by 3,777
Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products
Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro‐Forleo, G. (2001) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/eum0000000006155 · Cited by 2,974
Cited by
Green Product Innovation: Where we are and Where we are Going
Dangelico, R. M. (2016) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1886 · Cited by 676
Jabbour, C. J. C., Jugend, D., Jabbour, A. B. L. D. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Latan, H. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.036 · Cited by 324
How green technological innovation ability influences enterprise competitiveness
Li, G., Wang, X., Su, S., & Su, Y. (2019) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.04.012 · Cited by 300
Yang, X., Zhang, J., Ren, S., & Ran, Q. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125015 · Cited by 264
Buhl, A., Schmidt-Keilich, M., Muster, V., Blazejewski, S., Schrader, U., Harrach, C., Schäfer, M., & Süßbauer, E. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.259 · Cited by 188
Metadata
- Authors
- Driessen, P. H., Hillebrand, B., Kok, R. A. W., & Verhallen, T. M. M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 315-326
- ISSN
- 0018-9391 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0040
- OpenAlex
- W2109673349
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 22.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Green New Product Development: The Pivotal Role of Product Greenness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tem.2013.2246792
- The paper
- Driessen, P. H., Hillebrand, B., Kok, R. A. W., & Verhallen, T. M. M. (2013). Green New Product Development: The Pivotal Role of Product Greenness. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2013.2246792
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
