CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 110AI and HR TechnologiesMulti-Criteria Decision MakingTeam Dynamics and Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Team Formation for Human-Artificial Intelligence Collaboration in the Workplace: A Goal Programming Model to Foster Organizational Change

La Torre, Davide, Colapinto, Cinzia, Durosini, Ilaria, Triberti, Stefano·2023·IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
DOI 10.1109/tem.2021.3077195
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The need for preparing for digital transformation is a recurrent theme in the recent public and academic debate. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to reduce operational costs, increase efficiency, and improve customer experience. Thus, it is crucial to forming project teams in an organization, in such a way that they will welcome AI in the decision-making process. The current technological revolution is demanding a rapid pace of change to companies and has increased the attention to the role of teams in fostering innovation adoption. We propose an innovative multicriteria model based on the goal programming approach for solving the optimal allocation of individuals to different groups. The model copes with human resources’ cost and human–machine trust. Indeed, we propose an aggregated measure of the attitude towards AI tools to be employed to support tasks in an organization: more precisely our index is based on three dimensions: technology acceptance, technology self-efficacy, and source credibility. By incorporating this index in a team formation model, each team can be guaranteed to have less resistance to change in adopting machine-based decisions, a scenario that will characterize the years to come. The proposed index can also be integrated into more complex and comprehensive models to support business transformation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tem.2021.3077195

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Katzenbach, 1993, The Wisdom of Teams
  2. Barichard, 2008, Multiobjective Programming and Goal Programming: Theoretical results and Practical Applications
  3. Newell, 1972, Human Problem Solving
  4. Triberti, 2008, On social presence: Theories, methodologies, and guidelines for the innovative contexts of computer-mediated learning, Enhancing Social Presence in Online Learning Environments
  5. Dennett, 1989, The Intentional Stance

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
La Torre, D., Colapinto, C., Durosini, I., & Triberti, S.
Affiliations
  • SKEMA Business School, Université Côte d'Azur - Sophia Antipolis Campus, SOPHIA ANTIPOLIS CEDEX, France
  • Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT)
  • European Institute of Oncology (IT)
  • University of Milan (IT)
ORCID
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Published
2023-05
Volume
70
Issue
5
Pages
1966-1976
ISSN
  • 0018-9391 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0040
DOI
10.1109/tem.2021.3077195
OpenAlex
W3172537176
Cited by
110
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 15
FWCI
14.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (publishedVersion)
  • ARCA (Università Ca' Foscari Venezia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Keywords
team formation, human-AI collaboration, goal programming, multi-criteria decision making, organizational change, digital transformation, human-machine trust, technology acceptance, technology self-efficacy, source credibility, resistance to change, artificial intelligence adoption, human resource allocation, project team formation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review