The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organizational Ambidexterity: A Review and Research Agenda
Abstract
We review the literature on organizational ambidexterity using the hybrid review approach, which integrates bibliometric analysis with a framework-based review. We provide directions for future studies by identifying key gaps in the existing literature. The bibliometric analysis provides the trends and progress of the research field through citation analysis, analysis of keyword co-occurrence, and other bibliometric indicators such as most influential journals, countries, and authors. The TCCM (Theories, Contexts, Characteristics, and Methodology) framework helps us to identify the widely used theories, constructs, and methods in ambidexterity research and provides new avenues for future research by analyzing the most used theories, methods, constructs, and research contexts. We suggest that future researchers should explore the behavioral components of firms’ environment as an antecedent factor and there should be more emphasis on summarization of the divergent views pertaining to ambidexterity enablers. In addition to identifying the key research themes and knowledge structure of organizational ambidexterity, this review would help to create a value to the ambidexterity literature in terms of quantification and consolidation of research evolution. This is the first comprehensive literature review using hybrid approach (bibliometric review with TCCM framework) in the field of organizational ambidexterity research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 · Cited by 21,484
Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis
He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0078 · Cited by 3,737 · cited 4×
“strategic management [37], organizational design [112], and most recently in university entrepreneurship [16], [110] which shows the growing importance as well as the application of ambidexterity concept in different research domains.”
BackgroundInfluentialOrganizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present, and Future
O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2013.0025 · Cited by 2,580
Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR)
Paul, J., Lim, W. M., O’Cass, A., Hao, A. W., & Bresciani, S. (2021) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12695 · Cited by 2,364
Self-citationThe effectiveness of celebrity endorsements: a meta-analysis
Knoll, J., & Matthes, J. (2017) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-016-0503-8 · Cited by 601
‘Masstige’ marketing: A review, synthesis and research agenda
Kumar, A., Paul, J., & Unnithan, A. B. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.030 · Cited by 437
Self-citationInternational franchising: A literature review and research agenda
Rosado-Serrano, A., Paul, J., & Dikova, D. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.049 · Cited by 401
Self-citation
Cited by
Paul, J., Khatri, P., & Kaur Duggal, H. (2024) · Journal of Decision Systems · doi:10.1080/12460125.2023.2197700 · Cited by 533
Self-citationFactors affecting green purchase behavior: A systematic literature review
Sharma, K., Aswal, C., & Paul, J. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3237 · Cited by 325
Self-citationBen Jabeur, S., Ballouk, H., Ben Arfi, W., & Sahut, J.-M. (2023) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113631 · Cited by 70
Pomerlyan, E., & Belitski, M. (2023) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2023.10.003 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Chakma, R., Paul, J., & Dhir, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 71
- Pages
- 121-137
- ISSN
- 0018-9391 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0040
- OpenAlex
- W3210164227
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 20.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organizational Ambidexterity: A Review and Research Agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tem.2021.3114609
- The paper
- Chakma, R., Paul, J., & Dhir, S. (2024). Organizational Ambidexterity: A Review and Research Agenda. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2021.3114609
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.