Cited by 10Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

TC-driver: A trajectory conditioned reinforcement learning approach to zero-shot autonomous racing

Ghignone, Edoardo, Baumann, Nicolas, Magno, Michele·2024·IEEE Transactions on Field Robotics

Abstract

Autonomous racing challenges perception, planning, and control algorithms, serving as a testbed for general autonomous driving. While traditional methods, such as model predictive control (MPC), can generate optimal control sequences, they are sensitive to modeling parameter accuracy. This article introduces trajectory-conditioned RL controller (TC-Driver), a reinforcement learning (RL) approach for robust control in autonomous racing, addressing tire parameter modeling inaccuracies. TC-Driver is conditioned by a trajectory from any high-level planner, combining RL’s learning capabilities with the reliability of traditional planning. Trained under varying tire conditions, it aims to generalize across different model parameters, enhancing real-world racing performance. Experimental results show TC-Driver improves generalization robustness compared with a state-of-the-art (SotA) end-to-end architecture. It achieves a 29-fold improvement in crash ratio when facing model mismatch and successfully transfers to unseen tracks with new features, while the baseline fails. In physical deployment, TC-Driver demonstrates zero-shot Sim2Real capabilities, outperforming end-to-end agents tenfold in crash ratio while maintaining similar driving characteristics in reality as in simulation. This hybrid RL architecture leverages traditional planning methods’ reliability while exploiting RL’s ability to handle model uncertainties, offering a robust solution for autonomous racing challenges.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tfr.2024.3499912

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In [8], deployment on the real platform is constrained to final velocities slower than those during training due to steering misbehavior.

    “deployment on the real platform is constrained to final velocities slower than those during training due to the encountered steering misbehavior.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1002/rob.21977 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/rob.22063 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/rob.21743 · DOI
  4. Law, 2018, Robust model predictive control for autonomous vehicles/self driving cars, arXiv:1805.08551 · arXiv
  5. 10.1109/tcst.2019.2948135 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/icra40945.2020.9197465 · DOI
  7. O’Kelly, F1TENTH: An open-source evaluation environment for continuous control and reinforcement learning, 77
  8. 10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.9197080 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/oca.2123 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/OJITS.2022.3181510 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.030 · DOI
  12. Pacejka, 2012, Tire characteristics and vehicle handling and stability, 1, 10.1016/B978-0-08-097016-5.00001-2 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/ITSC55140.2022.9922239 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/TIV.2019.2955362 · DOI
  15. Liniger, Pushing the limits of friction: A story of model mismatch, 1
  16. Fröhlich, 2021, Model learning and contextual controller tuning for autonomous racing, arXiv:2110.02710 · arXiv
  17. Jain, Bayesrace: Learning to race autonomously using prior experience, 155, 1918
  18. 10.1109/ECC.2016.7810413 · DOI
  19. Sutton, 2018, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
  20. 10.1038/s41586-021-04301-9 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1177/0278364919887447 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1126/scirobotics.abk2822 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/lra.2021.3064284 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/s41586-021-04357-7 · DOI
  25. 10.1109/ICRA46639.2022.9811650 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1109/ICRA48506.2021.9562079 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/LRA.2018.2800101 · DOI
  28. Li, 2018, Reinforcement learning and deep learning based lateral control for autonomous driving, arXiv:1810.12778 · arXiv
  29. 10.1109/ROBOT.2010.5509799 · DOI
  30. 10.1109/TRO.2019.2942989 · DOI
  31. 10.1109/ICRA48506.2021.9561049 · DOI
  32. Brockman, 2016, OpenAI gym, arXiv:1606.01540 · arXiv
  33. Althoff, CommonRoad: Composable benchmarks for motion planning on roads, 719
  34. 10.1109/IVS.2017.7995816 · DOI
  35. Haarnoja, 2018, Soft actor-critic: Off-policy maximum entropy deep reinforcement learning with a stochastic actor, arXiv:1801.01290 · arXiv
  36. 10.1080/00423114.2019.1631455 · DOI
  37. 10.1109/ICRA.2016.7487258 · DOI
  38. 10.1007/978-3-319-08338-4_25 · DOI
  39. Seyde, 2021, Is bang-bang control all you need? Solving continuous control with Bernoulli policies, arXiv:2111.02552 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ghignone, E., Baumann, N., & Magno, M.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Field Robotics
Published
2024
Volume
1
Pages
527-536
ISSN
2997-1101 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404411088
Cited by
10
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE transactions on field robotics. (publishedVersion)
Funders
Center for Project-Based Learning, D-ITET, ETH Zurich
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Keywords
autonomous racing, zero-shot learning, model mismatch robustness, sim-to-real transfer, racing car control, crash avoidance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review