The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TC-driver: A trajectory conditioned reinforcement learning approach to zero-shot autonomous racing
Abstract
Autonomous racing challenges perception, planning, and control algorithms, serving as a testbed for general autonomous driving. While traditional methods, such as model predictive control (MPC), can generate optimal control sequences, they are sensitive to modeling parameter accuracy. This article introduces trajectory-conditioned RL controller (TC-Driver), a reinforcement learning (RL) approach for robust control in autonomous racing, addressing tire parameter modeling inaccuracies. TC-Driver is conditioned by a trajectory from any high-level planner, combining RL’s learning capabilities with the reliability of traditional planning. Trained under varying tire conditions, it aims to generalize across different model parameters, enhancing real-world racing performance. Experimental results show TC-Driver improves generalization robustness compared with a state-of-the-art (SotA) end-to-end architecture. It achieves a 29-fold improvement in crash ratio when facing model mismatch and successfully transfers to unseen tracks with new features, while the baseline fails. In physical deployment, TC-Driver demonstrates zero-shot Sim2Real capabilities, outperforming end-to-end agents tenfold in crash ratio while maintaining similar driving characteristics in reality as in simulation. This hybrid RL architecture leverages traditional planning methods’ reliability while exploiting RL’s ability to handle model uncertainties, offering a robust solution for autonomous racing challenges.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In [8], deployment on the real platform is constrained to final velocities slower than those during training due to steering misbehavior.
“deployment on the real platform is constrained to final velocities slower than those during training due to the encountered steering misbehavior.”
From RLPP: A Residual Method for Zero-Shot Real-World Autonomous Racing on Scaled Platforms (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cites
A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologies
Yurtsever, E., Lambert, J., Carballo, A., & Takeda, K. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2983149 · Cited by 1,889
Crayton, T. J., & Meier, B. M. (2017) · Journal of Transport & Health · doi:10.1016/j.jth.2017.04.004 · Cited by 181
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- 10.1002/rob.21977 · DOI
- 10.1002/rob.22063 · DOI
- 10.1002/rob.21743 · DOI
- Law, 2018, Robust model predictive control for autonomous vehicles/self driving cars, arXiv:1805.08551 · arXiv
- 10.1109/tcst.2019.2948135 · DOI
- 10.1109/icra40945.2020.9197465 · DOI
- O’Kelly, F1TENTH: An open-source evaluation environment for continuous control and reinforcement learning, 77
- 10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.9197080 · DOI
- 10.1002/oca.2123 · DOI
- 10.1109/OJITS.2022.3181510 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.030 · DOI
- Pacejka, 2012, Tire characteristics and vehicle handling and stability, 1, 10.1016/B978-0-08-097016-5.00001-2 · DOI
- 10.1109/ITSC55140.2022.9922239 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIV.2019.2955362 · DOI
- Liniger, Pushing the limits of friction: A story of model mismatch, 1
- Fröhlich, 2021, Model learning and contextual controller tuning for autonomous racing, arXiv:2110.02710 · arXiv
- Jain, Bayesrace: Learning to race autonomously using prior experience, 155, 1918
- 10.1109/ECC.2016.7810413 · DOI
- Sutton, 2018, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
- 10.1038/s41586-021-04301-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0278364919887447 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/scirobotics.abk2822 · DOI
- 10.1109/lra.2021.3064284 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-021-04357-7 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICRA46639.2022.9811650 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICRA48506.2021.9562079 · DOI
- 10.1109/LRA.2018.2800101 · DOI
- Li, 2018, Reinforcement learning and deep learning based lateral control for autonomous driving, arXiv:1810.12778 · arXiv
- 10.1109/ROBOT.2010.5509799 · DOI
- 10.1109/TRO.2019.2942989 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICRA48506.2021.9561049 · DOI
- Brockman, 2016, OpenAI gym, arXiv:1606.01540 · arXiv
- Althoff, CommonRoad: Composable benchmarks for motion planning on roads, 719
- 10.1109/IVS.2017.7995816 · DOI
- Haarnoja, 2018, Soft actor-critic: Off-policy maximum entropy deep reinforcement learning with a stochastic actor, arXiv:1801.01290 · arXiv
- 10.1080/00423114.2019.1631455 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICRA.2016.7487258 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-08338-4_25 · DOI
- Seyde, 2021, Is bang-bang control all you need? Solving continuous control with Bernoulli policies, arXiv:2111.02552 · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
RLPP: A Residual Method for Zero-Shot Real-World Autonomous Racing on Scaled Platforms
Ghignone, E., Baumann, N., Hu, C., Wang, J., Xie, L., Carron, A., & Magno, M. (2025) · 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra55743.2025.11127278 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghignone, E., Baumann, N., & Magno, M.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Field Robotics
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 527-536
- ISSN
- 2997-1101 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4404411088
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE transactions on field robotics. (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Center for Project-Based Learning, D-ITET, ETH Zurich
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
- Keywords
- autonomous racing, zero-shot learning, model mismatch robustness, sim-to-real transfer, racing car control, crash avoidance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review