Cited by 71Human-Automation Interaction and SafetyOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Cognitive Workload and Learning Assessment During the Implementation of a Next-Generation Air Traffic Control Technology Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Harrison, Joshua, Izzetoglu, Kurtulus, Ayaz, Hasan, Willems, Ben, Hah, Sehchang, Ahlstrom, Ulf, Woo, Hyun, Shewokis, Patricia A. +2 more·2014·IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems

Abstract

Neuroimaging technologies, such as functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIR), could provide performance metrics directly from brain-based measures to assess safety and performance of operators in high-risk fields. In this paper, we objectively and subjectively examine the cognitive workload of air traffic control specialists utilizing a next-generation conflict resolution advisory. Credible differences were observed between continuously increasing workload levels that were induced by increasing the number of aircraft under control. In higher aircraft counts, a possible saturation in brain activity was realized in the fNIR data. A learning effect was also analyzed across a three-day/nine-session training period. The difference between Day 1 and Day 2 was credible, while there was a noncredible difference between Day 2 and Day 3. The results presented in this paper indicate some advantages in objective measures of cognitive workload assessment with fNIR cortical imaging over the subjective workload assessment keypad.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/thms.2014.2319822

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Harrison et al. found that oxygenation levels measured by fNIRS increased along with self-reports of increased cognitive workload as the number of aircraft under operator control increased.

    “In an air traffic control simulation, they found oxygenation levels measured by fNIRS increased along with self-reports of increased cognitive workload as the number of aircrafts under operator control increased [19].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrison, J., Izzetoglu, K., Ayaz, H., Willems, B., Hah, S., Ahlstrom, U., Woo, H., Shewokis, P. A., Bunce, S. C., & Onaral, B.
Affiliations
  • Drexel University (US)
  • Federal Aviation Administration (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems
Published
2014-08
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
429-440
ISSN
  • 2168-2291 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2305
OpenAlex
W2030517061
Cited by
71
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8
FWCI
11.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
mental workload, air traffic control, functional near-infrared spectroscopy, learning assessment, brain activity, perceived workload, neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review