Cited by 10Muscle activation and electromyography studiesProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Leveraging High-Density EMG to Investigate Bipolar Electrode Placement for Gait Prediction Models

Open access
Hodossy, Balint K., Guez, Annika S., Jing, Shibo, Huo, Weiguang, Vaidyanathan, Ravi, Farina, Dario·2024·IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

For the control of wearable robotics, it is critical to obtain a prediction of the user’s motion intent with high accuracy. Electromyography (EMG) recordings have often been used as inputs for these devices, however bipolar EMG electrodes are highly sensitive to their location. Positional shifts of electrodes after training gait prediction models can therefore result in severe performance degradation. This study uses high-density EMG electrodes to simulate various bipolar electrode signals from four leg muscles during steady-state walking. The bipolar signals were ranked based on the consistency of the corresponding EMG envelope’s activity and timing across gait cycles. The locations were then compared by evaluating the performance of an offline Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) that mapped EMG signals to knee angles. The results showed that electrode locations with consistent EMG envelopes resulted in greater prediction accuracy compared to hand-aligned placements (p<0.01). However, performance gains through this process were limited, and did not resolve the position shift issue. Instead of training a model for a single location, we showed that randomly sampling bipolar combinations across the high-density EMG grid during training mitigated this effect. Models trained with this method generalised over all positions, and achieved 70% less prediction error than location specific models over the entire area of the grid. Therefore, the use of high-density EMG grids to build training datasets could enable the development of models robust to spatial variations, and reduce the impact of muscle-specific electrode placement on accuracy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/thms.2024.3371099

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2324153 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2009.08.005 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/TMRB.2021.3105141 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/0954411918819115 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.11.018 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/BIOCAS.2018.8584757 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2963881 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2906584 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/JAS.2021.1003865 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2006.06.001 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/biostatistics/kxz041 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Hermens, 1999, European recommendations for surface electromyography, Roessingh Res. Develop., 8, 13
  13. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102363 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.014 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.02.017 · DOI
  16. 10.1109/TBME.2011.2159216 · DOI
  17. 10.1109/TBME.2019.2952890 · DOI
  18. 10.1109/TNSRE.2020.3038374 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/JSEN.2019.2927325 · DOI
  20. 10.1109/TBME.2011.2177662 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/TNSRE.2020.3030931 · DOI
  22. 10.3389/fnbot.2020.00058 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1109/LRA.2021.3062562 · DOI
  24. 10.1109/TMRB.2022.3166543 · DOI
  25. 10.1109/TNSRE.2007.910282 · DOI
  26. 10.1115/1.3138397 · DOI
  27. Vaughan, 1992, Dynamics of Human Gait, 2
  28. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00935.x · DOI
  29. 10.1109/TBCAS.2019.2959160 · DOI
  30. 10.1109/TBME.2019.2943309 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1162/089976698300017197 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00423 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.09.016 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2007.04.004 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.014 · DOI
  36. 10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2366752 · DOI
  37. 10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9176498 · DOI
  38. 10.1109/TBME.2021.3065809 · DOI
  39. 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2962189 · DOI
  40. 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2946625 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.11.009 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hodossy, B. K., Guez, A. S., Jing, S., Huo, W., Vaidyanathan, R., & Farina, D.
Affiliations
  • Department of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, U.K.
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Nankai University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems
Published
2024-04
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
192-201
ISSN
  • 2168-2291 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2305
OpenAlex
W4392902505
Cited by
10
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • UKRI CDT in AI for Healthcare (EP/S023283/1)
  • CDT in Prosthetics and Orthotics (EP/S02249X/1)
  • U.K. Dementia Research Institute Care Research &amp; Technology Centre
  • Natural BionicS initative (810346)
  • Hamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery of Imperial College London
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
high-density surface electromyography, gait prediction, knee angle estimation, temporal convolutional network, training data generation, gait cycle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review