Cited by 296Advanced DC-DC ConvertersWireless Power Transfer SystemsMultilevel Inverters and Converters

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A natural ZVS medium-power bidirectional DC-DC converter with minimum number of devices

Hui Li, Fang Zheng Peng, Lawler, J.S.·2003·IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications

Abstract

This paper introduces a new bidirectional, isolated DC-DC converter. A typical application for this converter can be found in the auxiliary power supply of hybrid electric vehicles. A dual half-bridge topology has been developed to implement the required power rating using the minimum number of devices. Unified zero-voltage switching was achieved in either direction of power flow with neither a voltage-clamping circuit nor extra switching devices and resonant components. All these new features allow high power density, efficient power conversion, and compact packaging. Complete descriptions of operating principle and design guidelines are provided in this paper. An extended state-space averaged model is developed to predict large- and small-signal characteristics of the converter in either direction of power flow. A 1.6-kW prototype has been built and successfully tested under full power. The experimental results of the converter's steady-state operation confirm the soft-switching operation, simulation analysis, and the developed averaged model. The proposed converter is a good alternative to full-bridge isolated bidirectional DC-DC converter in medium-power applications.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tia.2003.808965

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 12 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. De Doncker, 1989, Power conversion apparatus for dc/dc conversion using dual active bridges

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Li, H., Peng, F. Z., & Lawler, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications
Published
2003-03
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
525-535
ISSN
0093-9994 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158012148
Cited by
296
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 23
FWCI
11.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced DC-DC Converters
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Power Transfer Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Multilevel Inverters and Converters
Keywords
bidirectional DC-DC converter, zero-voltage switching, isolated converter, medium power converters, state-space averaged model, soft switching, power density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review