Cited by 578Multilevel Inverters and ConvertersElectric Power Systems and ControlSensorless Control of Electric Motors

A Comparison of Three-Level Converters Versus Two-Level Converters for Low-Voltage Drives, Traction, and Utility Applications

Teichmann, R., Bernet, S.·2005·IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications

Abstract

This paper evaluates three-level topologies as alternatives to two-level topologies in converters for low-voltage applications. Topologies, semiconductor losses, filter aspects, part count, initial cost, and life-cycle cost are compared for a grid interface, a conventional drive application, and a high-speed drive application.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tia.2005.847285

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The higher the switching frequency, the more superior the multilevel inverter is.

    “Consequently, the higher the switching frequency, the more superior the multilevel inverter is [97].”
  • Reduced filter cost has resulted in a 3% lower system cost in the case of three-level NPC inverter.

    “It can be seen that reduced filter cost has resulted in a 3% lower system cost in case of three-level NPC inverter.”
  • By comparing same-technology IGBTs with different rated voltages, a series connection of two low-voltage IGBTs in a multilevel inverter will have lower power loss than a single high-voltage IGBT in a two-level structure.

    “By comparing same-technology IGBTs with different rated voltages, it can be resulted that a series connection of two low-voltage IGBTs in a multilevel inverter will have lower power loss than a single high-voltage IGBT in a two-level structure.”
  • Since cabling, control electronics, and fan failures have a higher failure rate than semiconductors, the higher efficiency of multilevel inverters increases reliability by reducing the temperature inside the system.

    “Moreover, since cabling, control electronics, and fan failures have a higher failure rate than semiconductors, the higher efficiency of multilevel inverters increase reliability by reducing the temperature inside the system [97].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teichmann, R., & Bernet, S.
Affiliations
  • GE Global Research (United States) (US)
  • Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications
Published
2005-05
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
855-865
ISSN
0093-9994 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137265371
Cited by
578
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 29
FWCI
10.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Multilevel Inverters and Converters
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power Systems and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Sensorless Control of Electric Motors
Keywords
three-level converter, two-level converter, low-voltage drive, traction drives, semiconductor switching losses, filter design, initial cost, life cycle cost, high-speed drives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review