Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Strategies for the Fault-Tolerant Current Control of a Five-Phase Permanent-Magnet Motor

Bianchi, Nicola, Bolognani, Silverio, Dai Pre, Michele·2007·IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications

Abstract

This paper deals with the postfault current control strategies of a five-phase permanent-magnet (PM) motor. The analysis covers both the open circuit of one and two phases and the short circuit at the machine terminal of one phase. The proposed control guarantees safe drive operation after any fault occurrence. For the sake of generality, an analytical model has been used to investigate the properties of each postfault strategy. The results are general, and they apply to PM motor of any power rating. Simulations and experimental results validate the theoretical predictions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tia.2007.900445

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
Bianchi, N., Bolognani, S., & Dai Pre, M.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications
Published
2007
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
960-970
ISSN
0093-9994 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2104532649
Cited by
276
References
0
FWCI
7.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategies for the Fault-Tolerant Current Control of a Five-Phase Permanent-Magnet Motor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tia.2007.900445
The paper
Bianchi, N., Bolognani, S., & Dai Pre, M. (2007). Strategies for the Fault-Tolerant Current Control of a Five-Phase Permanent-Magnet Motor. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. https://doi.org/10.1109/tia.2007.900445

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.