Cited by 32Spacecraft Design and TechnologyPhotovoltaic System Optimization TechniquesAdvanced DC-DC Converters

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of Peak Power Tracking Based Electric Power System Architectures for CubeSats

Edpuganti, Amarendra, Khadkikar, Vinod, Zeineldin, Hatem, Moursi, Mohamed Shawky El, Al Hosani, Mohamed·2021·IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications

Abstract

CubeSats have been widely used for space research due to lower cost and faster development. The electric power system (EPS) is one of the key subsystems of CubeSat which powers all the other subsystems. One of the important steps in the EPS design is the selection of EPS architecture which should be done considering overall efficiency, battery size, reliability, and simplicity of control. In the literature, a general comparison between different architectures is performed without considering the mission parameters, power generation profile, and load profile based on the operational modes. Thus, the best possible EPS architecture may not be selected in the design phase. Therefore, the main objective of this article is to develop a systematic methodology to compare various peak power tracking EPS architectures of CubeSat in terms of orbital efficiency for all possible modes of operation, component count, reliability, and battery size to meet the required number of cycles of charge/discharge for the given mission duration. The proposed methodology has been demonstrated using the real data and scenarios of MYSAT-1, which is a 1U CubeSat developed and launched by Khalifa University. The results demonstrate that EPS architecture with series-connected maximum power tracking converters for solar panels and unregulated dc-bus has the highest efficiency for all operating modes, lower component count, higher reliability, and minimum battery capacity or longer lifetime for the same batte…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tia.2021.3055449

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 10.1109/INDUSCON.2016.7874605 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/RAST.2013.6581295 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/AERO.2002.1036866 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/MAES.2019.2950747 · DOI
  5. mattos, 2018, IEEE Aerosp Electron Syst Mag, 33, 4, 10.1109/MAES.2018.170076 · DOI
  6. clark, 0, Power system challenges for small satellite missions, Proc Euro Small Satell Serv Symp, 1
  7. 10.1109/RAST.2011.5966894 · DOI · Paper page
  8. schaffner, 0, The electronic system design, analysis, integration, and construction of the Cal Poly State University CP1 CubeSat, Proc 16th AIAA/USU Annu Conf Small Satell, 1
  9. 0, GOLIAT space mission: Earth observation and near earth environment monitoring using NanoSatellites, Proc Int Astronaut Congr B4 Small Sat Mission Symp, 1
  10. 10.1109/INDICON47234.2019.9030303 · DOI
  11. 10.1109/ICSIGSYS.2019.8811038 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/BEC.2016.7743767 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/AERO.2002.1036865 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/PESGRE45664.2020.9070355 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/RAST.2019.8767869 · DOI
  16. 10.1109/PEDES.2014.7041984 · DOI
  17. 10.23919/AE.2018.8501421 · DOI
  18. 10.1109/7.745682 · DOI
  19. m, 2014, Student research highlight smart panel bodies for modular small satellites, IEEE Aerosp Electron Syst Mag, 29, 38, 10.1109/MAES.2014.140127 · DOI
  20. 10.1109/AERO.2019.8742113 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/MAES.2009.5282283 · DOI
  22. 10.1109/MAES.2017.150245 · DOI
  23. naveda-castillo, 0, Characterization of DC converters for energy power systems on CubeSats, Proc IEEE 27th Int Conf Electron Elect Eng Comp, 1
  24. 10.1109/JSYST.2013.2285659 · DOI
  25. 10.1109/TAES.2011.5937278 · DOI
  26. 10.1109/TAES.2020.3028488 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/PVSC.2017.8366626 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1109/IRSEC.2015.7455059 · DOI
  29. 10.1109/INDCON.2012.6420604 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1109/PVSC.2015.7356294 · DOI
  31. 10.1109/CCSSE.2017.8087960 · DOI
  32. 10.1049/iet-rpg.2020.0225 · DOI
  33. 10.1201/9781420038217 · DOI · Paper page
  34. mourra, 0, Buck boost regulator (B2R) for spacecraft solar array power conversion, Proc IEEE Appl Power Electron Conf Expo, 1313
  35. 10.1109/TAES.2018.2803598 · DOI
  36. 10.1109/IconSpace.2015.7283829 · DOI
  37. 10.1109/TIA.2014.2344446 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.10.035 · DOI
  39. santoni, 0, Commercial li-ion batteries for nanosatellite applications: A flight experiment, Proc 6th Eur Conf Space Power, 653
  40. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.02.004 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.10.014 · DOI
  42. langer, 0, Reliability of CubeSats statistical data, developers beliefs and the way forward, Proc 30th Annu AIAA/USU Conf Small Satell
  43. 10.1109/AERO.2015.7119122 · DOI
  44. 10.5028/jatm.v8i1.531 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 32

Metadata

Authors
Edpuganti, A., Khadkikar, V., Zeineldin, H., Moursi, M. S. E., & Al Hosani, M.
Affiliations
  • Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE)
  • Cairo University (EG)
  • Mansoura University (EG)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications
Published
2021-05
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
2758-2768
ISSN
  • 0093-9994 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9367
OpenAlex
W3126269538
Cited by
32
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Masdar Institute of Science and Technology
  • Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (02/MI/MIT/CP/11/07633/GEN/G/00)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced DC-DC Converters
Keywords
CubeSat, maximum power point tracking, series-connected converters, solar panels, battery sizing, reliability, component count, space power systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Peak Power Tracking Based Electric Power System Architectures for CubeSats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tia.2021.3055449
The paper
Edpuganti, A., Khadkikar, V., Zeineldin, H., Moursi, M. S. E., & Al Hosani, M. (2021). Comparison of Peak Power Tracking Based Electric Power System Architectures for CubeSats. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. https://doi.org/10.1109/tia.2021.3055449