The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of Peak Power Tracking Based Electric Power System Architectures for CubeSats
Abstract
CubeSats have been widely used for space research due to lower cost and faster development. The electric power system (EPS) is one of the key subsystems of CubeSat which powers all the other subsystems. One of the important steps in the EPS design is the selection of EPS architecture which should be done considering overall efficiency, battery size, reliability, and simplicity of control. In the literature, a general comparison between different architectures is performed without considering the mission parameters, power generation profile, and load profile based on the operational modes. Thus, the best possible EPS architecture may not be selected in the design phase. Therefore, the main objective of this article is to develop a systematic methodology to compare various peak power tracking EPS architectures of CubeSat in terms of orbital efficiency for all possible modes of operation, component count, reliability, and battery size to meet the required number of cycles of charge/discharge for the given mission duration. The proposed methodology has been demonstrated using the real data and scenarios of MYSAT-1, which is a 1U CubeSat developed and launched by Khalifa University. The results demonstrate that EPS architecture with series-connected maximum power tracking converters for solar panels and unregulated dc-bus has the highest efficiency for all operating modes, lower component count, higher reliability, and minimum battery capacity or longer lifetime for the same batte…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A comparison of the peak power tracking EPS architectures in [38], demonstrate that EPS architecture with series connected MPPT converters and unregulated dc-bus has greater reliability, lower component count, good battery life, and the highest efficiency for all operating modes.”
From A Comprehensive Review on Small Satellite Microgrids (2022) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“A comparison of the peak power tracking EPS architectures in [38], demonstrate that EPS architecture with series connected MPPT converters and unregulated dc-bus has greater reliability, lower component count, good battery life, and the highest efficiency for all operating modes.”
From A Comprehensive Review on Small Satellite Microgrids (2022) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“A comparison of the peak power tracking EPS architectures in [38], demonstrate that EPS architecture with series connected MPPT converters and unregulated dc-bus has greater reliability, lower component count, good battery life, and the highest efficiency for all operating modes.”
From A Comprehensive Review on Small Satellite Microgrids (2022) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“A comparison of the peak power tracking EPS architectures in [38], demonstrate that EPS architecture with series connected MPPT converters and unregulated dc-bus has greater reliability, lower component count, good battery life, and the highest efficiency for all operating modes.”
From A Comprehensive Review on Small Satellite Microgrids (2022) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“The majority of the SmallSats utilize MPPT architecture [38].”
From A Comprehensive Review on Small Satellite Microgrids (2022) · cites this paper as [38]
Citations
Cites
Modeling and Design of Electrical Power Subsystem for CubeSats
Acharya, S., Alshehhi, F., Tsoupos, A., Khan, O., Elmoursi, M., Khadkikar, V., Zeineldin, H., & Al Hosani, M. (2019) · 2019 International Conference on Smart Energy Systems and Technologies (SEST) · doi:10.1109/sest.2019.8849042 · Cited by 19
Self-citationDesign and On-Orbit Verification of EPS for the World’s First 12U Polarized Light Detection CubeSat
Peng, L., Jun, Z., & Xiaozhou, Y. (2018) · International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences · doi:10.1007/s42405-018-0059-6 · Cited by 14
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- 10.1109/INDUSCON.2016.7874605 · DOI
- 10.1109/RAST.2013.6581295 · DOI
- 10.1109/AERO.2002.1036866 · DOI
- 10.1109/MAES.2019.2950747 · DOI
- mattos, 2018, IEEE Aerosp Electron Syst Mag, 33, 4, 10.1109/MAES.2018.170076 · DOI
- clark, 0, Power system challenges for small satellite missions, Proc Euro Small Satell Serv Symp, 1
- 10.1109/RAST.2011.5966894 · DOI · Paper page
- schaffner, 0, The electronic system design, analysis, integration, and construction of the Cal Poly State University CP1 CubeSat, Proc 16th AIAA/USU Annu Conf Small Satell, 1
- 0, GOLIAT space mission: Earth observation and near earth environment monitoring using NanoSatellites, Proc Int Astronaut Congr B4 Small Sat Mission Symp, 1
- 10.1109/INDICON47234.2019.9030303 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICSIGSYS.2019.8811038 · DOI
- 10.1109/BEC.2016.7743767 · DOI
- 10.1109/AERO.2002.1036865 · DOI
- 10.1109/PESGRE45664.2020.9070355 · DOI
- 10.1109/RAST.2019.8767869 · DOI
- 10.1109/PEDES.2014.7041984 · DOI
- 10.23919/AE.2018.8501421 · DOI
- 10.1109/7.745682 · DOI
- m, 2014, Student research highlight smart panel bodies for modular small satellites, IEEE Aerosp Electron Syst Mag, 29, 38, 10.1109/MAES.2014.140127 · DOI
- 10.1109/AERO.2019.8742113 · DOI
- 10.1109/MAES.2009.5282283 · DOI
- 10.1109/MAES.2017.150245 · DOI
- naveda-castillo, 0, Characterization of DC converters for energy power systems on CubeSats, Proc IEEE 27th Int Conf Electron Elect Eng Comp, 1
- 10.1109/JSYST.2013.2285659 · DOI
- 10.1109/TAES.2011.5937278 · DOI
- 10.1109/TAES.2020.3028488 · DOI
- 10.1109/PVSC.2017.8366626 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/IRSEC.2015.7455059 · DOI
- 10.1109/INDCON.2012.6420604 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/PVSC.2015.7356294 · DOI
- 10.1109/CCSSE.2017.8087960 · DOI
- 10.1049/iet-rpg.2020.0225 · DOI
- 10.1201/9781420038217 · DOI · Paper page
- mourra, 0, Buck boost regulator (B2R) for spacecraft solar array power conversion, Proc IEEE Appl Power Electron Conf Expo, 1313
- 10.1109/TAES.2018.2803598 · DOI
- 10.1109/IconSpace.2015.7283829 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIA.2014.2344446 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.10.035 · DOI
- santoni, 0, Commercial li-ion batteries for nanosatellite applications: A flight experiment, Proc 6th Eur Conf Space Power, 653
- 10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.02.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.10.014 · DOI
- langer, 0, Reliability of CubeSats statistical data, developers beliefs and the way forward, Proc 30th Annu AIAA/USU Conf Small Satell
- 10.1109/AERO.2015.7119122 · DOI
- 10.5028/jatm.v8i1.531 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Comprehensive Review on Small Satellite Microgrids
Yaqoob, M., Lashab, A., Vasquez, J. C., Guerrero, J. M., Orchard, M. E., & Bintoudi, A. D. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2022.3175093 · Cited by 93
An Open-Source CubeSat Electrical Power Supply
Damkjar, S., Zhu, J., Cockburn, B. F., & Elliott, D. G. (2026) · IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine · doi:10.1109/maes.2025.3638725
Metadata
- Authors
- Edpuganti, A., Khadkikar, V., Zeineldin, H., Moursi, M. S. E., & Al Hosani, M.
- Affiliations
- Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE)
- Cairo University (EG)
- Mansoura University (EG)
- ORCID
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2758-2768
- ISSN
- 0093-9994 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9367
- OpenAlex
- W3126269538
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 2.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Masdar Institute of Science and Technology
- Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (02/MI/MIT/CP/11/07633/GEN/G/00)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced DC-DC Converters
- Keywords
- CubeSat, maximum power point tracking, series-connected converters, solar panels, battery sizing, reliability, component count, space power systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Peak Power Tracking Based Electric Power System Architectures for CubeSats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tia.2021.3055449
- The paper
- Edpuganti, A., Khadkikar, V., Zeineldin, H., Moursi, M. S. E., & Al Hosani, M. (2021). Comparison of Peak Power Tracking Based Electric Power System Architectures for CubeSats. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. https://doi.org/10.1109/tia.2021.3055449