Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,026

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Overview of Electric Motor Technologies Used for More Electric Aircraft (MEA)

Open access
Wenping Cao, Mecrow, B. C., Atkinson, G. J., Bennett, J. W., Atkinson, D. J.·2012·IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of motor drive technologies used for safety-critical aerospace applications, with a particular focus placed on the choice of candidate machines and their drive topologies. Aircraft applications demand high reliability, high availability, and high power density while aiming to reduce weight, complexity, fuel consumption, operational costs, and environmental impact. New electric driven systems can meet these requirements and also provide significant technical and economic improvements over conventional mechanical, hydraulic, or pneumatic systems. Fault-tolerant motor drives can be achieved by partitioning and redundancy through the use of multichannel three-phase systems or multiple single-phase modules. Analytical methods are adopted to compare caged induction, reluctance, and PM motor technologies and their relative merits. The analysis suggests that the dual (or triple) three-phase PMAC motor drive may be a favored choice for general aerospace applications, striking a balance between necessary redundancy and undue complexity, while maintaining a balanced operation following a failure. The modular single-phase approach offers a good compromise between size and complexity but suffers from high total harmonic distortion of the supply and high torque ripple when faulted. For each specific aircraft application, a parametrical optimization of the suitable motor configuration is needed through a coupled electromagnetic and thermal analysis, and should be verified by finite-element analysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tie.2011.2165453

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Fault-tolerant permanent magnet machinedrives

    Mecrow, B. C., Jack, A. G., Haylock, J. A., & Coles, J. (1996) · IEE Proceedings - Electric Power Applications · doi:10.1049/ip-epa:19960796 · Cited by 376 · cited 1×

    “To improve fault tolerance, it would be ideal to have a multiple of independent single-phase drives [19], [44], [47],”
    BackgroundSelf-citation

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,026

Metadata

Authors
Cao, W., Mecrow, B. C., Atkinson, G. J., Bennett, J. W., & Atkinson, D. J.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
Published
2012-09
Volume
59
Issue
9
Pages
3523-3531
ISSN
  • 0278-0046 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9948
OpenAlex
W1978050119
Cited by
1,026
References
1
FWCI
20.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overview of Electric Motor Technologies Used for More Electric Aircraft (MEA). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tie.2011.2165453
The paper
Cao, W., Mecrow, B. C., Atkinson, G. J., Bennett, J. W., & Atkinson, D. J. (2012). Overview of Electric Motor Technologies Used for More Electric Aircraft (MEA). IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2011.2165453

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.