Cited by 31Wireless Power Transfer SystemsNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesMagnetic Field Sensors Techniques

Noncooperative Metal Object Detection Using Pole-to-Pole EM Distribution Characteristics for Wireless EV Charger Employing DD Coils

Niu, Songyan, Zhao, Qingyu, Chen, Haibiao, Niu, Shuangxia, Jian, Linni·2024·IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics

Abstract

Metal object detection (MOD) is indispensable for wireless electric vehicle charging (WEVC) systems for safety concerns. Most recently, interests are growing in MOD by electromagnetic (EM) sensing. However, current works based on EM sensing rarely target the systems with DD coils, a promising coil type for commercialization. Additionally, EM sensing schemes are mostly derived from a mindset, viz., cooperation between two sensing coils to obtain the voltage difference as a MOD criterion. Hence, undesired out-of-phase incident becomes an inherent problem jeopardizing the success rates of detection. In this article, noncooperative MOD, which solely relies on the voltages of individual sensing coils rather than cooperative ones, is proposed with absolute confidence in detection results. A unique sensing coil array is devised to suit the field characteristics of DD coils perfectly. Size-modulated patch coils are created to eliminate the undetectable zones with proper polarity configuration. Moreover, virtual double-layer sensing coils are constructed to enhance MOD's reliability. Tested by 13 different positions and three types of MOs using a 3.0-kW WEVC prototype, the induced voltages reach at least four times the threshold value. Moreover, the stability of the proposed method is verified successfully no matter the system operates in light-load or heavy-load conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tie.2023.3292870

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of low-loss silicon carbide (SiC) or gallium nitride (GaN) power switches can mitigate switching losses and enhance overall system efficiency in DAB converters.

    “While a large number of switches may lead to higher switching losses, the use of low-loss silicon carbide (SiC) [89] or gallium nitride (GaN) power switches [90] can effectively mitigate these losses and enhance overall system efficiency.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Niu, S., Zhao, Q., Chen, H., Niu, S., & Jian, L.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
Published
2024-06
Volume
71
Issue
6
Pages
6335-6344
ISSN
  • 0278-0046 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9948
OpenAlex
W4384787288
Cited by
31
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics (publishedVersion)
Funders
Science and Technology Innovation Committee of Shenzhen (JCYJ20220530113008019)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Power Transfer Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques
Keywords
metal object detection, electric vehicle wireless charging, charging safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review