SAFELearning: Secure Aggregation in Federated Learning With Backdoor Detectability
Open accessAbstract
For model privacy, local model parameters in federated learning shall be obfuscated before sent to the remote aggregator. This technique is referred to assecure aggregation. However, secure aggregation makes model poisoning attacks such as backdooring more convenient given that existing anomaly detection methods mostly require access to plaintext local models. This paper proposes a new federated learning technique SAFE-Learning to support backdoor detection for secure aggregation. We achieve this through two new primitives -oblivious random grouping (ORG)andpartial parameter disclosure (PPD). ORG partitions participants into one-time random subgroups with group configurations oblivious to participants; PPD allows secure partial disclosure of aggregated subgroup models for anomaly detection without leaking individual model privacy. ORG is based on our construction of several new primitives including tree-based random subgroup generation, oblivious secure aggregation, and randomized Diffie-Hellman key exchange. ORG can thwart colluding attackers from knowing each other’s group membership assignment with non-negligible advantage than random guess. Backdoor attacks are detected based on statistical distributions of the subgroup aggregated parameters of the learning iterations. SAFELearning can significantly reduce backdoor model accuracy without jeopardizing the main task accuracy under common backdoor strategies. Extensive experiments show SAFELearning is robust against malicious and faulty participants, whilst being more efficient than the state-of-art secure aggregation protocol in terms of both communication and computation costs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Zhang's design scheme has better performance in terms of communication and computational cost compared to Nuria's robust filtering operator, but Nuria focuses more on detection of outlier behaviors of adversarial participants.
“Compared to the robust filtering operator for one-dimensional outliers proposed by Nuria.Zhang's design scheme has better performance in terms of communication and computational cost, but Nuria focuses more on the detection of outlier behaviors of adversarial participants, with a focus on defending against model-poisoning attacks based on data poisoning and”
From Survey: federated learning data security and privacy-preserving in edge-Internet of Things (2024) · cites this paper as Zhang et al. 2023b
Cites
Douceur, J. R. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45748-8_24 · Cited by 4,419 · see citing works
How to backdoor federated learning
Bagdasaryan, E., Veit, A., Hua, Y., Estrin, D., & Shmatikov, V. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.00459 · Cited by 1,495 · see citing works
Trojaning Attack on Neural Networks
Liu, Y., Ma, S., Aafer, Y., Lee, W.-C., Zhai, J., Wang, W., & Zhang, X. (2018) · Proceedings 2018 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2018.23291 · Cited by 1,270 · see citing works
Manipulating Machine Learning: Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures for Regression Learning
Jagielski, M., Oprea, A., Biggio, B., Liu, C., Nita-Rotaru, C., & Li, B. (2018) · 2018 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2018.00057 · Cited by 861 · see citing works
Mitigating Sybils in Federated Learning Poisoning
Fung, C., Yoon, C. J. M., & Beschastnikh, I. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.04866 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
ShieldFL: Mitigating Model Poisoning Attacks in Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning
Ma, Z., Ma, J., Miao, Y., Li, Y., & Deng, R. H. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2022.3169918 · Cited by 371 · see citing works
Privacy-Enhanced Federated Learning Against Poisoning Adversaries
Liu, X., Li, H., Xu, G., Chen, Z., Huang, X., & Lu, R. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2021.3108434 · Cited by 351 · cited 3× · see citing works
“In Table III, we compared our protocol with PEFL [27] (simulated via Paillier cryptosystem) in terms of client and server running time.”
BackgroundMethod
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Survey: federated learning data security and privacy-preserving in edge-Internet of Things
Li, H., Ge, L., & Tian, L. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-024-10774-7 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
“The framework proposed a permission control contract and credit verification contract for the security authentication of the results of the credit sharing model under FL.”
InfluentialA robust analysis of adversarial attacks on federated learning environments
Nair, A. K., Raj, E. D., & Sahoo, J. (2023) · Computer Standards & Interfaces · doi:10.1016/j.csi.2023.103723 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Chen, C., Wei, L., Zhang, L., Peng, Y., & Ning, J. (2022) · Security and Communication Networks · doi:10.1155/2022/2985308 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhang, Z., Li, J., Yu, S., & Makaya, C.
- Affiliations
- Stevens Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
- Published
- 2023
- Volume
- 18
- Pages
- 3289-3304
- ISSN
- 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6021
- OpenAlex
- W4378195077
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 4.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- NSF (ECCS#1923739)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
- Keywords
- secure aggregation, federated learning, backdoor detection, backdoor attacks, model poisoning, model privacy, anomaly detection, safe learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review