The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Robust Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning Model Against Model Poisoning Attacks
Abstract
Although federated learning offers a level of privacy by aggregating user data without direct access, it remains inherently vulnerable to various attacks, including poisoning attacks where malicious actors submit gradients that reduce model accuracy. In addressing model poisoning attacks, existing defense strategies primarily concentrate on detecting suspicious local gradients over plaintext. However, detecting non-independent and identically distributed encrypted gradients poses significant challenges for existing methods. Moreover, tackling computational complexity and communication overhead becomes crucial in privacy-preserving federated learning, particularly in the context of encrypted gradients. To address these concerns, we propose a robust privacy-preserving federated learning model resilient against model poisoning attacks without sacrificing accuracy. Our approach introduces an internal auditor that evaluates encrypted gradient similarity and distribution to differentiate between benign and malicious gradients, employing a Gaussian Mixture Model and Mahalanobis Distance for byzantine-tolerant aggregation. The proposed model utilizes Additive Homomorphic Encryption to ensure confidentiality while minimizing computational and communication overhead. Our model demonstrates superior performance in accuracy and privacy compared to existing strategies and encryption techniques, such as Fully Homomorphic Encryption and Two-Trapdoor Homomorphic Encryption. The proposed model effectively addresses the challenge of detecting maliciously encrypted non-independent and identically distributed gradients with low computational and communication overhead.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Another promising technique is robust aggregation methods, where model updates are evaluated for anomalies before being integrated into the global model [72,73].”
From Federated Learning in Smart Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review on Privacy, Security, and Predictive Analytics with IoT Integration (2024) · cites this paper as [72]
In the citing paper
“Defense techniques such as adversarial training, where the model is pre-trained with adversarial samples, have displayed promise.”
From Federated Learning in Smart Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review on Privacy, Security, and Predictive Analytics with IoT Integration (2024) · cites this paper as [72]
In the citing paper
“In targeted poisoning attacks, malicious contributors corrupt the model to misidentify specific data, which could be utilized to target certain diseases or demographic groups.”
From Federated Learning in Smart Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review on Privacy, Security, and Predictive Analytics with IoT Integration (2024) · cites this paper as [72]
In the citing paper
“Designed to prevent malicious model updates from impacting the global model, this technique uses statistical approaches to filter irregularities in model updates, maintaining robustness even with a certain degree of compromised participants [72].”
From Federated Learning in Smart Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review on Privacy, Security, and Predictive Analytics with IoT Integration (2024) · cites this paper as [72]
In the citing paper
“Data manipulation attacks are crucial threats in FL, particularly in healthcare.”
From Federated Learning in Smart Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review on Privacy, Security, and Predictive Analytics with IoT Integration (2024) · cites this paper as [72]
In the citing paper
“Untargeted poisoning, in contrast, aims to degrade model efficiency globally, risking patient results over the board [72,76].”
From Federated Learning in Smart Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review on Privacy, Security, and Predictive Analytics with IoT Integration (2024) · cites this paper as [72]
Citations
Cites
Deep Learning with Differential Privacy
Abadi, M., Chu, A., Goodfellow, I., McMahan, H. B., Mironov, I., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/2976749.2978318 · Cited by 6,578
SecureML: A System for Scalable Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning
Mohassel, P., & Zhang, Y. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2017.12 · Cited by 1,936
On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Data
Li, X., Huang, K., Yang, W., Wang, S., & Zhang, Z. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.02189 · Cited by 1,575
FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrapping
Cao, X., Fang, M., Liu, J., & Gong, N. Z. (2021) · Proceedings 2021 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2021.24434 · Cited by 999
Data Poisoning Attacks Against Federated Learning Systems
Tolpegin, V., Truex, S., Gursoy, M. E., & Liu, L. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58951-6_24 · Cited by 927
Verifynet: Secure and verifiable federated learning
Xu, G., Li, H., Liu, S., Yang, K., & Lin, X. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2019.2929409 · Cited by 839
Personalized Cross-Silo Federated Learning on Non-IID Data
Huang, Y., Chu, L., Zhou, Z., Wang, L., Liu, J., Pei, J., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i9.16960 · Cited by 749
ShieldFL: Mitigating Model Poisoning Attacks in Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning
Ma, Z., Ma, J., Miao, Y., Li, Y., & Deng, R. H. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2022.3169918 · Cited by 371
Privacy-Enhanced Federated Learning Against Poisoning Adversaries
Liu, X., Li, H., Xu, G., Chen, Z., Huang, X., & Lu, R. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2021.3108434 · Cited by 351 · cited 8×
“Model poisoning adversaries manipulate user input by submitting poisonous updates to local models to create arbitrary deviance from correct trends [3].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPrivacy-Preserving Collaborative Deep Learning With Unreliable Participants
Zhao, L., Wang, Q., Zou, Q., Zhang, Y., & Chen, Y. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2019.2939713 · Cited by 215
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Bhagoji, Analyzing federated learning through an adversarial lens, 634
- Fung, The limitations of federated learning in Sybil settings, 301
- Fang, Local model poisoning attacks to Byzantine-robust federated learning, 1623
- Mozaffari, Every vote counts: Ranking-based training of federated learning to resist poisoning attacks, 1721
- Blanchard, Machine learning with adversaries: Byzantine tolerant gradient descent, 30, 118
- El Mhamdi, The hidden vulnerability of distributed learning in Byzantium, 3521
- Xie, DBA: Distributed backdoor attacks against federated learning
- Bell, ACORN: Input validation for secure aggregation, 4805
- Shen, AUROR: Defending against poisoning attacks in collaborative deep learning systems, 508
- 2023, Availability With Redundancy
- Goodfellow, 2016, Deep Learning
- 2016, Paillier Cryptosystem
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abbas, S. R., Abbas, Z., Zahir, A., & Lee, S. W. (2024) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare12242587 · Cited by 228
Albshaier, L., Almarri, S., & Albuali, A. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14051019 · Cited by 164
Saheed, Y. K., Omole, A. I., & Sabit, M. O. (2025) · Sensors International · doi:10.1016/j.sintl.2024.100297 · Cited by 88
Ghazal, T. M., Islam, S., Hasan, M. K., Abu-Shareha, A. A., Mokhtar, U. A., Khan, M. A., Baili, J., Saeed, A. Q., Bhatt, M. W., & Ahmad, M. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · doi:10.1109/tce.2025.3572629 · Cited by 70
“A privacy-preserving FL model suggested by Yazdinejad et al. [38] uses an internal auditor with Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) and Mahalanobis Distance to detect harmful encrypted gradients and AHE for secrecy achieves higher accuracy with lower computational and communication overhead on benchmark…”
A survey of security threats in federated learning
Feng, Y., Guo, Y., Hou, Y., Wu, Y., Lao, M., Yu, T., & Liu, G. (2025) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-024-01664-0 · Cited by 70
“However, further research has shown that federated learning also faces numerous security risks [11–15] like backdoor attacks, adversarial attacks, and Byzantine attacks.”
Dehghantanha, A., Yazdinejad, A., & Parizi, R. M. (2023) · doi:10.1145/3689933.3690832 · Cited by 39
“Early AI applications in cybersecurity involved basic anomaly detection, where systems learned to identify deviations from standard network behaviors [39].”
Self-citationAlansary, S. A., Ayyad, S. M., Talaat, F. M., & Saafan, M. M. (2025) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-025-02556-6 · Cited by 54
“Destabilizing the model undermines the model’s generalization ability as well as its capability to detect zero-day attacks accurately [193, 194].”
Cheng, Y., Zhang, W., Zhang, Z., Kang, J., Xu, Q. M., Wang, S., & Niyato, D. T. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2025.3529487 · Cited by 43
“As an emerging distributed machine learning paradigm, various related aspects of FL have been advanced in the fields of model aggregation [43], [44], [45], applications [46], [47], [48], privacy and security [49], [50], [51], and more.”
Auto-CIDS: An Autonomous Intrusion Detection System for Vehicular Networks
Sorkhpour, M., Yazdinejad, A., & Dehghantanha, A. (2023) · doi:10.1145/3689933.3690837 · Cited by 37
“Recent works [16], [10], [28], [11] have revealed vulnerabilities in automotive communication systems, especially the CAN bus.”
Self-citationMachine Learning for Blockchain and IoT Systems in Smart Cities: A Survey
Dritsas, E., & Τρίγκα, Μ. (2024) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi16090324 · Cited by 42
The paradigm of digital health: AI applications and transformative trends
Rashid, Z., Ahmed, H., Nadeem, N., Zafar, S. B., & Yousaf, M. Z. (2025) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-025-11081-0 · Cited by 45
“Algorithmic bias can be mitigated through regular audits and more sophisticated algorithms that detect disparities in AI outputs, which is particularly important in the underrepresented demographic groups [211].”
Haider, Z. A., Zeb, A., Rahman, T., Singh, S. K., Akram, R., Arishi, A., & Ullah, I. (2025) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2025.111484 · Cited by 40
Aledhari, M., Razzak, R., Rahouti, M., Yazdinejad, A., Parizi, R. M., Qolomany, B., Guizani, M., Qadir, J., & Al‐Fuqaha, A. (2025) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2025.104352 · Cited by 31
Self-citationEnhancing Heart Disease Prediction with Federated Learning and Blockchain Integration
Otoum, Y., Hu, C., Said, E. H., & Nayak, A. R. (2024) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi16100372 · Cited by 30
“Federated learning solves the conflict between data privacy and model performance, allowing institutions to collaboratively enhance their models without sharing sensitive data [1,2].”
Yazdinejad, A., & Kong, J. D. (2026) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.250959 · Cited by 28
Self-citationDib, O. (2025) · Results in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105456 · Cited by 31
Gulzar, Q., & Mustafa, K. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-89650-5 · Cited by 29
“These approaches will ensure promising, robust, and resilient security solutions in securing such ICS 35,63,64 settings from advanced cyber-attacks.”
Integrating machine learning with electrochemical sensors for intelligent food safety monitoring
Aaryashree, & Devi, A. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.aichem.2025.100105 · Cited by 27
Eren, H., Karaduman, Ö., & Gençoğlu, M. T. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15158704 · Cited by 28
Secure cloud computing: leveraging GNN and leader K-means for intrusion detection optimization
Dugyala, R., Chithaluru, P., Ramchander, M., Kumar, S., V, Yadav, A., Yadav, N. S., AbdElminaam, D. S., & Alsekait, D. M. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-81442-7 · Cited by 23
Qian, J., Zheng, M., Yu, Y., Zhou, C., & Miao, D. (2024) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2024.121316 · Cited by 24
A Survey on Energy-Efficient Design for Federated Learning over Wireless Networks
Dang, X.-T., Vu, B., Nguyen, Q.-S., Tran, T.-D., Eom, J.-S., & Shin, O. (2024) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en17246485 · Cited by 26
Kumar, A., Maulik, A., & Chinmaya, K. A. (2025) · IETE Technical Review · doi:10.1080/02564602.2025.2522083 · Cited by 21
“Security is another critical issue, as FEDL is susceptible to adversarial threats such as model poisoning and inference leakage [190].”
ATD Learning: A secure, smart, and decentralised learning method for big data environments
Alzubaidi, L., Jebur, S. A., Jaber, T. A., Mohammed, M. A., Alwzwazy, H. A., Saihood, A., Gammulle, H., Santamaría, J., Duan, Y., Fookes, C., et al. (2025) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2025.102953 · Cited by 25
Anjum, M., Dutta, A. K., Elrashidi, A., Shahab, S., Aldrees, A., Shaikh, Z. A., & Aljohani, A. A. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-10826-0 · Cited by 32
A Survey on Model-heterogeneous Federated Learning: Problems, Methods, and Prospects
Fan, B., Jiang, S., Su, X. J., Tarkoma, S., & Hui, P. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10825769 · Cited by 30
“An adversary might reverse-engineer the raw data from model information, as both weights and gradients are derived from the input data through specific matrix operations [44].”
BackgroundBackdoor attacks and defense mechanisms in federated learning: A survey
Li, Z., Lan, J., Yan, Z., & Erol Gelenbe, A. (2025) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103248 · Cited by 20
Soomro, I. A., Rehman, H. U., Hussain, S. J., Iqbal, A., Khalid, W., & Yu, H. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2025.3647642 · Cited by 19
“Yazdinejad et al. [60] proposed an internal auditing mechanism utilizing GMM and MD with additive homomorphic encryption (AHE) to detect malicious encrypted gradients while minimizing computational overhead.”
Nandhini, S., Rajeswari, A., & Shanker, N. R. (2024) · Journal of Cloud Computing Advances Systems and Applications · doi:10.1186/s13677-024-00722-9 · Cited by 17
Singh, J. P., Aqsa, A., Ghani, I., Sonani, R., & Govindarajan, V. (2025) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi17080345 · Cited by 25
Ahmad, S. Z., & Qamar, F. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-78262-0 · Cited by 16
Chowa, S. S., Bhuiyan, M. R. I., Tahosin, M. S., Karim, A., Montaha, S., Hassan, M. M., Shah, M. A., & Azam, S. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-83972-6 · Cited by 17
“Moreover, PHE encryption provides strong protection against inference and model reconstruction attacks 49 .”
Symbiotic Federated Learning for Giant AI Threat Detection in 6G-IoT Infrastructures
Nazari, H., Yazdinejad, A., Dehghantanha, A., Zarrinkalam, F., & Srivastava, G. (2025) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3595872 · Cited by 14
“This is acceptable in managed industrial environments, but can be mitigated through: 1) Threshold cryptography for distributed trust [22].”
InfluentialSelf-citationNazari, H., Yazdinejad, A., Dehghantanha, A., Zarrinkalam, F., & Srivastava, G. (2023) · doi:10.1145/3689933.3690836 · Cited by 17
“These switches are tasked with forwarding network flow data for APT detection analysis via the OpenFlow protocol, enabling real-time data processing and autonomous anomaly detection [36].”
Self-citationPriRoAgg: Achieving Robust Model Aggregation With Minimum Privacy Leakage for Federated Learning
Hou, S., Li, S., Jahani-Nezhad, T., & Caire, G. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2025.3577498 · Cited by 14
“Several studies have endeavored to tackle this issue [21], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [47], [48], [71].”
InfluentialMultimodal large language models for medical image diagnosis: Challenges and opportunities
Zhang, A., Zhao, E., Wang, R., Zhang, X., Wang, J., & Chen, E. (2025) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104895 · Cited by 16
A privacy-preserving federated learning approach for airline upgrade optimization
Chen, S., & Huang, Y. (2024) · Journal of Air Transport Management · doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102693 · Cited by 13
Analysis of deep learning under adversarial attacks in hierarchical federated learning
Alqattan, D. S., Snåšel, V., Ranjan, R. K., & Ojha, V. (2025) · High-Confidence Computing · doi:10.1016/j.hcc.2025.100321 · Cited by 12
AI in Medical Questionnaires: Scoping Review
Luo, X., Li, Y. L., Xu, J., Zheng, Z., Ying, F., & Huang, G. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/72398 · Cited by 15
“Federated learning has emerged as an innovative approach to protect data privacy, allowing AI models to learn from distributed datasets without centralized data sharing, thereby mitigating the risk of data breaches [146].”
Ha, J., El Azzaoui, A., & Park, J. H. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25030788 · Cited by 13
“Abbas Yazdinejad et al. [22] introduced an FL model designed to counteract model poisoning attacks using Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM) and Mahalanobis Distance (MD) for anomaly detection in gradient updates, coupled with Additive Homomorphic Encryption (AHE) for data confidentiality.”
InfluentialPan, Y., Su, Z., Wang, Y., Zhou, J., & Mahmoud, M. M. E. A. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2024.3524834 · Cited by 15
“Yazdinejad et al. facilitated Byzantine-tolerantaggregationbyemployingtheGaussianMix-tureModelandMahalanobisdistance,withadditiveHEpro-tectingparticipants’privacyduringtraining[22].”
Sanjalawe, Y. K., Al-E’mari, S., Alqurashi, T., Alharbi, Z. H., Makhadmeh, S. N., & Alsharaiah, M. A. (2025) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.3281 · Cited by 11
Yu, H., Ma, C., Liu, M., Du, T., Ding, M., Xiang, T., Ji, S., & Liu, X. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2025.3639985 · Cited by 24
“FL is increasingly recognized for its vulnerability to back-door attacks [31], [57], [59], which pose a significant security concern.”
Guan, M., Bao, H., Li, Z., Pan, H., Huang, C., & Dai, H. (2024) · Journal of Systems Architecture · doi:10.1016/j.sysarc.2024.103304 · Cited by 11
Xu, J., Zhang, C., Jin, L., & Su, C. (2025) · Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy · doi:10.3390/jcp5030037 · Cited by 11
DeSA: Decentralized Secure Aggregation for Federated Learning in Zero-Trust D2D Networks
Wang, L., Lu, Z., Li, M., Wang, J., Gai, K., & Chen, X. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2026.3658996 · Cited by 10
Akhtar, M. M., Alasmari, S. A., Haidar, S. K. W., & Alzubaidi, A. (2025) · Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications · doi:10.1007/s12083-024-01894-6 · Cited by 10
Role-based federated learning exploiting IPFS for privacy enhancement in IoT environment
Kim, H., Heo, G., & Doh, I. (2025) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2025.111200 · Cited by 10
Rezaie, H., Taheri, R., Shojafar, M., & Foh, C. H. (2025) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-025-11385-1 · Cited by 10
“Backdoor attacks, on the other hand, discreetly implant triggers within the data, causing the model to produce incorrect outputs when those triggers are activated under certain conditions [12, 28, 31].”
Blockchain Based Secure Federated Learning With Local Differential Privacy and Incentivization
Chaudhury, S. D., Morreddigari, L. R., Varun, M., Sengupta, T., Chakraborty, S., Sural, S., Vaidya, J. S., & Atluri, V. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Privacy · doi:10.1109/tp.2024.3487819 · Cited by 11
“However, the standard implementations of FL are susceptible to various kinds of security and privacy attacks, such as data [4] and model poisoning [5], [6], interference [7] and Byzantine attacks [8], model extraction attacks [9], evasion attacks [10], etc.”
A blockchain-based secure data sharing scheme with efficient attribute revocation
Li, S., Niu, K., & Wu, B. (2024) · Journal of Systems Architecture · doi:10.1016/j.sysarc.2024.103309 · Cited by 9
PBTMS: A Blockchain-Based Privacy-Preserving System for Reliable and Efficient E-Commerce
Zhang, R., Li, Y., & Fang, L. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14061177 · Cited by 9
Baligodugula, V. V., & Amsaad, F. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14061218 · Cited by 9
“IoT devices can contribute to improved services while protecting user behavior data [28].”
EAFL: Edge-Assisted Federated Learning for real-time disease prediction using privacy-preserving AI
Rawas, S., & Samala, A. D. (2025) · Iran Journal of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42044-025-00251-x · Cited by 9
“DP ensures that no single data point has a significant influence on the final model, preventing potential privacy breaches [25].”
Liu, H., Guo, C., Ma, Y., & Wang, Y. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127409 · Cited by 10
EARVP: Efficient Aggregation for Federated Learning With Robustness, Verifiability, and Privacy
Yan, C., Lu, X., Lió, P., & Hui, P. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2025.3576008 · Cited by 10
“At the same time, due to the lack of trusted authority, honest clients cannot verify aggregation integrity in the robust aggregation architecture with privacy protection [6], [19], [20], [21].”
Alzahrani, A. I. A. (2025) · The Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-025-07682-0 · Cited by 9
“However, that does not seriously affect performance [20].”
Ullah, I., Deng, X., Pei, X., Mushtaq, H., Uzair, M., & Qayyum, S. (2025) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2025.111705 · Cited by 12
Jabbar, A., Huang, J., Jabbar, M. K., & Mahmood, T. (2025) · Results in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107203 · Cited by 9
Kumar, B. V. R., Gupta, S., Dwivedi, R., Alsekait, D. M., AbdElminaam, D. S., & Kilickaya, O. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-37802-6 · Cited by 9
“Yazdinejad et al. 20 implemented a resilient privacy-preserving FL approach for model poisoning attack mitigation.”
Network Intrusion Detection Based on Deep Belief Network Broad Equalization Learning System
Deng, M., Sun, C., Kan, Y., Xu, H., Zhou, X., & Fan, S. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13153014 · Cited by 9
Enforcing Differential Privacy in Federated Learning via Long-Term Contribution Incentives
Tang, X., Peng, L., Weng, Y., Shen, M., Zhu, L., & Deng, R. H. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2025.3550777 · Cited by 9
“Yazdinejad et al. [27] proposed a privacy-preserving FL model utilizing additive PHE and an internal auditor leveraging Gaussian Mixture Models and Mahalanobis Distance to e ff ectively di ff erentiate between benign and malicious encrypted gradients.”
Naresh, V. S., & Ayyappa, D. (2025) · Journal of Information Security and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jisa.2025.104084 · Cited by 10
Bai, Y., Wang, Y., Xu, X., Yang, Y., Batool, H., Iqbal, Z., & Xu, J. (2025) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2025.111430 · Cited by 8
Ren, Y., Yang, Z., Feng, G., & Zhang, X. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tetci.2025.3540420 · Cited by 7
“…et al. introduce an internal auditor that evaluates encrypted gradient similarity and distribution to differentiate between benign and malicious gradients, employing a Gaussian Mixture Model and Mahalanobis Distance for byzantine-tolerant aggregation to improve the accuracy of the model [22].”
TinyML strategies for privacy-preserving and cyber threat multi-classification in edge-IoT networks
Haddouti, S. E., & Lazraq, W. (2025) · Computing · doi:10.1007/s00607-025-01522-y · Cited by 9
“The authors of [18] introduce a privacy-preserving federated learning model that resists model poisoning attacks by integrating an internal auditor.”
Wahed, M. K. Y. A. (2025) · Journal of Information & Knowledge Management · doi:10.1142/s021964922550073x · Cited by 7
Adaptive-Personalised Federated Deep Learning for Privacy-Aware NAFLD Screening
Veeravalli, S. D., Patil, P. A., Porwal, T., Karwande, V. S., Budhewar, A. S., & Nanche, B. M. (2025) · International Conference on Innovations in Intelligent Systems: Advancements in Computing, Communication, and Cybersecurity (ISAC3) · doi:10.1109/isac364032.2025.11156569 · Cited by 7
“Consequently, this approach is well-known, extensively utilized, and considered a standard for federated learning [24].”
Interplay of ML and blockchain for secure Internet of Military Vehicles communication underlying 5G
Sojitra, M., Jadav, N. K., Gupta, R., Patel, U. R., Patel, J. B., Tanwar, S., Pau, G., Alqahtani, F. H., & Tolba, A. (2025) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2025.103968 · Cited by 7
Apak, S., Değim, İ. T., & Zahertar, S. (2026) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-025-11828-9 · Cited by 7
“Other privacy-preserving solutions integrate secure aggregation and anomaly filtering to defend against model poisoning in sensitive contexts [ 25 ].”
Benameur, R., & Dahane, A. (2025) · Cluster Computing · doi:10.1007/s10586-024-05091-1 · Cited by 10
“We will conduct a comparative analysis of the CKKS scheme against other leading methods from the literature, including Additive Homomorphic Encryption and Two-Trapdoor Homomor-phic Encryption [36, 37].”
Weng, J., Luo, Z., & Li, S. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2025.3563820 · Cited by 6
“The primary objective of targeted attacks is to learn an adversarial perturbation δ for an input image x with the aim of misleading deep models into predicting a specific target class t .”
Decentralized IoMT Architecture for Privacy-Preserving Remote Patient Monitoring
Yin, L., Du, X., Cheng, Y., Li, J., Tong, N., & Li, F. (2025) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2025.3575941 · Cited by 6
“Ryu et al. [29], Lin et al. [30], and Yazdinejad et al. [31] use multiparty collaboration and secure multiparty computation (MPC) to ensure model privacy.”
LVSA: Lightweight and verifiable secure aggregation for federated learning
Li, G., Zhang, Z., & Du, R. (2025) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2025.130712 · Cited by 7
Kumar, G., Elicherla, S. L. R., Saxena, S., Swamy, K. A., Ashwini, P., & Kumar, U. P. (2025) · e-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering Electronics and Energy · doi:10.1016/j.prime.2025.101057 · Cited by 6
Mao, J., Wei, Z., Li, B., Zhang, R., & Song, L. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2025.3602226 · Cited by 6
“For instance, to defend against model poisoning attacks, Ma et al. [18] proposed ShieldFL, a defense using homomorphic encryption to identify malicious encrypted gradients, while Yazdinejad et al. [19] developed a model with an internal auditor using statistical methods for the same purpose.”
Privacy-by-design AIoT vision for intelligent urban environments
Ivanovska, M., Kreft, J., Štruc, V., & Perš, J. (2025) · Journal of Systems Architecture · doi:10.1016/j.sysarc.2025.103586 · Cited by 6
Liu, X., Sun, H., Sun, N., Jia, B., & Xiao, D. (2025) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2025.131931 · Cited by 6
Verma, R., & Jailia, M. (2025) · Journal of Cloud Computing Advances Systems and Applications · doi:10.1186/s13677-025-00797-y · Cited by 6
“Federated learning systems are highly susceptible to poisoning attacks where adversarial clients submit manipulated model updates to degrade global performance [42].”
Blockchain-enabled identity management for IoT: a multi-layered defense against adversarial AI
Usama, M., Aziz, A., Alasbali, N. A., Alturki, N. M., Hanif, M. U., & Rehman, M. U. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-35208-y · Cited by 6
PriFFT: Privacy-Preserving Federated Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models via Hybrid Secret Sharing
You, Z., Dong, X., Cheng, K., Mu, X., Fu, J., Ma, S., Qu, Q., & Shen, Y. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2026.3661572 · Cited by 6
“Abbas et al. present an HE-based privacy-preserving FL against model poisoning attacks with an internal auditor and Byzantine-tolerant gradient aggregation [23].”
Semantic-Aware Federated Blockage Prediction (SFBP) in Vision-Aided Next-Generation Wireless Network
Khan, A. R., Manzoor, H. U., Rais, R. N. B., Hussain, S., Mohjazi, L., Imran, M. A., & Zoha, A. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2024.3525338 · Cited by 6
“Recent studies have explored these challenges in different applications, highlighting the need for robust aggregation mechanisms and adaptive strategies to ensure reliable performance [16], [17].”
Alamer, A. M. A., & Basudan, S. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3545786 · Cited by 6
“Schemes such as RPPFL in [39] face difficulties in distinguishing the local trained model on non-IID data, primarily due to the inherent challenge of differentiating between poisonous and benign gradients in the presence of divergence.”
InfluentialA Verifiable, Privacy-Preserving, and Poisoning Attack-Resilient Federated Learning Framework
Mbonu, W. E., Maple, C. R., Epiphaniou, G., & Panchev, C. (2025) · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · doi:10.3390/bdcc9040085 · Cited by 7
Verma, P., O’Shea, D., Newe, T., Mehta, N., Bharot, N., & Breslin, J. G. (2025) · The Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-025-07292-w · Cited by 6
Kokate, S., & Shrawankar, U. N. (2025) · Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies · doi:10.1002/ett.70139 · Cited by 7
“A strong privacy-preserving FL (PPFL) model that is resistant to model poisoning assaults without compromising accuracy was suggested by Yazdinejad et al. [34] in order to alleviate the issues.”
Agarwal, U., Rishiwal, V., Yadav, M., & Yadav, P. (2025) · Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications · doi:10.1007/s12083-025-01994-x · Cited by 5
Undermining Federated Learning Accuracy in EdgeIoT via Variational Graph Auto-Encoders
Li, K., Hu, S., Wu, B., Zou, S., Ni, W., & Dressler, F. (2025) · International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC) · doi:10.1109/iwcmc65282.2025.11059509 · Cited by 5
“The malicious device is either a manipulated benign IoT device or an attacker, aiming to minimize the training accuracy of federated learning [19].”
Attentive neural processes based on reliable inferences for industrial equipment anomaly detection
Huang, Y., Yang, B. Y., Wang, S., Xie, K., Wang, Y., Yi, L., & Dong, N. (2025) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2025.104331 · Cited by 5
Benfriha, S., Labraoui, N., Salameh, H. B., & Bensaid, R. (2025) · Cluster Computing · doi:10.1007/s10586-025-05188-1 · Cited by 5
“Yazdinejad et al. [28] presented a robust privacy-preserving FDL model designed to resist model poisoning attacks without compromising accuracy.”
Jin, C., Wang, J., Lu, W. D., Luo, C., Liu, J., Chen, G., & Zhai, Z. (2025) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s44443-025-00256-3 · Cited by 5
“To further enhance privacy, Yazdinejad et al. (2024) incorporated differential privacy mechanisms to secure model parameters on edge devices in beyond-5G networks.”
Wu, J., Luo, F., Sun, T., Wang, H., & Zhang, W. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2025.3617070 · Cited by 7
“To improve scalability, more recent works [30], [31], [32] adopt single-key CKKS [39], where all users encrypt their data under a shared key.”
InfluentialSumayli, M., & Anubi, O. M. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2026.3653933 · Cited by 5
“This decentralized approach significantly reduces privacy risks, mitigates communication overhead, and improves system robustness against data breaches [20].”
Sharma, N. A., Kumar, K. N. P., Khorshed, M. T., Ali, A. B. M. S., Khalid, H. M., Muyeen, S. M., & Jose, L. (2024) · Information · doi:10.3390/info15090558 · Cited by 5
SensFL: Privacy-Preserving Vertical Federated Learning with Sensitive Regularization
Cai, B., Zhang, C., Liu, Z., Xu, X., Hu, F., Dai, J., & Wang, W. (2024) · Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences · doi:10.32604/cmes.2024.055596 · Cited by 5
VIFL: vulnerability identification using federated learning in the internet of things systems
Issa, W., Moustafa, N., Turnbull, B., Sohrabi, N., Tari, Z., & Zomaya, A. Y. (2024) · Computing · doi:10.1007/s00607-024-01365-z · Cited by 5
“However, FL-based vulnerability identification still faces three key challenges [9–11]: data heterogeneity (statistical heterogeneity), system heterogeneity, and ensuring the reasonable level of privacy guarantee when the FL used to train ML models on data containing sensitive informationn.”
A Model of Encrypted Network Traffic Classification that Trades Off Accuracy and Efficiency
Yu, L., Yuan, J., Zheng, J., & Yang, N. (2024) · Journal of Network and Systems Management · doi:10.1007/s10922-024-09892-y · Cited by 6
“A strong privacy-preserving federated learning model that can withstand model poisoning attacks without compromising accuracy has been proposed by Yazdinejad et al. [67] to overcome these problems.”
Feature engineering based intelligent intrusion detection system for IoT network security
Sadhwani, S., Sriwastawa, A., Muthalagu, R., & Pawar, P. M. (2025) · International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s13042-025-02631-y · Cited by 5
“In recent years, access to computer systems has risen dramatically and intruders have found several ways to hide their identities with ease [15, 33].”
Shen, C., Zhang, W., Zhou, T., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2024) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2024.054434 · Cited by 9
Privacy-Preserving Multilayer Community Detection via Federated Learning
Ma, S., Xu, X.-K., & Xiao, J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2024.3493967 · Cited by 5
“Yazdinejad et al. [42] proposed a framework that utilizes the Gaussian mixture model and marginal distance for Byzantine fault-tolerant aggregation to effectively deal with non-IID.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Yazdinejad, A., Dehghantanha, A., Karimipour, H., Srivastava, G., & Parizi, R. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Guelph (CA)
- University of Calgary (CA)
- Brandon University (CA)
- Kennesaw State University (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 19
- Pages
- 6693-6708
- ISSN
- 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6021
- OpenAlex
- W4400076000
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 139 · 2025: 205 · 2024: 33
- FWCI
- 55.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
- Keywords
- privacy-preserving federated learning, model poisoning, additive homomorphic encryption, Gaussian mixture model, Mahalanobis distance, communication overhead
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review