Cited by 161Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

Steel Surface Defect Detection Using a New Haar–Weibull-Variance Model in Unsupervised Manner

Liu, Kun, Wang, Heying, Chen, Haiyong, Qu, Erqing, Tian, Ying, Sun, Hexu·2017·IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement

Abstract

Automatic defect detection on the steel surface is a challenging task in computer vision, owing to miscellaneous patterns of the defects, low contrast between the defect and background, the existence of pseudo defects, and so on. In this paper, a new Haar-Weibull-variance (HWV) model is proposed for steel surface defect detection in an unsupervised manner. First, an anisotropic diffusion model is utilized to eliminate the influence of pseudodefects. Second, a new HWV model is established to characterize the texture distribution of each local patch in the image. The proposed model can project the texture distribution of each patch into the low-dimensional space with only two parameters. The parameter distribution of the whole image can also be unified into the form of linear radiation in an Euclidean space. The reliable background can be extracted via the formation of parameter distribution, by which the model parameter can be optimized further. Finally, the adaptive threshold can be determined to distinguish the defect from the background. Experimental results show that the proposed method can detect an arbitrary type of defect on the homogeneously textured surface and achieve an average detection rate of 96.2% on the data set, which outperforms the previous methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tim.2017.2712838

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Liu et al. developed a Haar-Weibull-variance (HWV) model by replacing local gradient magnitude features with Haar features from local patches.

    “Hence, Liu et al. [91] developed a Haar-Weibull-variance (HWV) model by replacing the features of local gradient magnitude by Haar features from local patches.”
  • The HWV model achieved an average correct detection rate of 96.2% on a homogeneously textured defect dataset from an actual hot-rolling mill.

    “This method is reported to have achieved an average correct detection rate of 96.2% on a homogeneously textured defect dataset gathered from an actual hot-rolling mill.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, K., Wang, H., Chen, H., Qu, E., Tian, Y., & Sun, H.
Affiliations
  • Hebei University of Technology (CN)
  • Tianjin University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Published
2017-10
Volume
66
Issue
10
Pages
2585-2596
ISSN
  • 0018-9456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9662
OpenAlex
W2736973763
Cited by
161
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 1
FWCI
12.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61403119)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (F201402166)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Keywords
steel surface defect detection, unsupervised defect detection, anisotropic diffusion, texture distribution, background extraction, adaptive thresholding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review