Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 401

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Devil is in the Channels: Mutual-Channel Loss for Fine-Grained Image Classification

Open access
Chang, Dongliang, Ding, Yifeng, Xie, Jiyang, Bhunia, Ayan Kumar, Li, Xiaoxu, Ma, Zhanyu, Wu, Ming, Guo, Jun, Song, Yi-Zhe·2020·IEEE Transactions on Image Processing

Abstract

The key to solving fine-grained image categorization is finding discriminate and local regions that correspond to subtle visual traits. Great strides have been made, with complex networks designed specifically to learn part-level discriminate feature representations. In this paper, we show that it is possible to cultivate subtle details without the need for overly complicated network designs or training mechanisms - a single loss is all it takes. The main trick lies with how we delve into individual feature channels early on, as opposed to the convention of starting from a consolidated feature map. The proposed loss function, termed as mutual-channel loss (MC-Loss), consists of two channel-specific components: a discriminality component and a diversity component. The discriminality component forces all feature channels belonging to the same class to be discriminative, through a novel channel-wise attention mechanism. The diversity component additionally constraints channels so that they become mutually exclusive across the spatial dimension. The end result is therefore a set of feature channels, each of which reflects different locally discriminative regions for a specific class. The MC-Loss can be trained end-to-end, without the need for any bounding-box/part annotations, and yields highly discriminative regions during inference. Experimental results show our MC-Loss when implemented on top of common base networks can achieve state-of-the-art performance on all four fine-grained categorization datasets (CUB-Birds, FGVC-Aircraft, Flowers-102, and Stanford Cars). Ablative studies further demonstrate the superiority of the MC-Loss when compared with other recently proposed general-purpose losses for visual classification, on two different base networks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tip.2020.2973812

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Cited by

See all 401

Metadata

Authors
Chang, D., Ding, Y., Xie, J., Bhunia, A. K., Li, X., Ma, Z., Wu, M., Guo, J., & Song, Y.-Z.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Published
2020
Volume
29
Pages
4683-4695
ISSN
  • 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0042
OpenAlex
W3008809756
Cited by
401
References
54
FWCI
24.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Devil is in the Channels: Mutual-Channel Loss for Fine-Grained Image Classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tip.2020.2973812
The paper
Chang, D., Ding, Y., Xie, J., Bhunia, A. K., Li, X., Ma, Z., Wu, M., Guo, J., & Song, Y.-Z. (2020). The Devil is in the Channels: Mutual-Channel Loss for Fine-Grained Image Classification. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2020.2973812

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.