The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood With NP-Dimensionality
Open accessAbstract
Penalized likelihood methods are fundamental to ultra-high dimensional variable selection. How high dimensionality such methods can handle remains largely unknown. In this paper, we show that in the context of generalized linear models, such methods possess model selection consistency with oracle properties even for dimensionality of Non-Polynomial (NP) order of sample size, for a class of penalized likelihood approaches using folded-concave penalty functions, which were introduced to ameliorate the bias problems of convex penalty functions. This fills a long-standing gap in the literature where the dimensionality is allowed to grow slowly with the sample size. Our results are also applicable to penalized likelihood with the L(1)-penalty, which is a convex function at the boundary of the class of folded-concave penalty functions under consideration. The coordinate optimization is implemented for finding the solution paths, whose performance is evaluated by a few simulation examples and the real data analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
The adaptive lasso and its oracle properties
Zou, H. (2006) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000000735 · Cited by 7,470
Cited by
Best subset selection via a modern optimization lens
Bertsimas, D., King, A., & Mazumder, R. (2016) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/15-aos1388 · Cited by 655
Moving Object Detection by Detecting Contiguous Outliers in the Low-Rank Representation
Zhou, X., Yang, C., & Yu, W. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.132 · Cited by 648
Quantile Regression for Analyzing Heterogeneity in Ultra-High Dimension
Wang, L., Wu, Y., & Li, R. (2012) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2012.656014 · Cited by 323
Strong oracle optimality of folded concave penalized estimation
Fan, J., Xue, L., & Zou, H. (2014) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/13-aos1198 · Cited by 313
Self-citationTuning Parameter Selection in High Dimensional Penalized Likelihood
Fan, Y., & Tang, C. Y. (2013) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/rssb.12001 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, J., & Lv, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 5467-5484
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9654
- OpenAlex
- W2133593515
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 27.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood With NP-Dimensionality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tit.2011.2158486
- The paper
- Fan, J., & Lv, J. (2011). Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood With NP-Dimensionality. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2011.2158486
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.