Cited by 166Emotion and Mood RecognitionHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFace and Expression Recognition

On the classification of emotional biosignals evoked while viewing affective pictures: An integrated data-mining-based approach for healthcare applications

Frantzidis, C.A., Bratsas, C., Klados, M.A., Konstantinidis, E., Lithari, C.D., Vivas, A.B., Papadelis, C.L., Kaldoudi, E. +2 more·2010·IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine

Abstract

Recent neuroscience findings demonstrate the fundamental role of emotion in the maintenance of physical and mental health. In the present study, a novel architecture is proposed for the robust discrimination of emotional physiological signals evoked upon viewing pictures selected from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS). Biosignals are multichannel recordings from both the central and the autonomic nervous systems. Following the bidirectional emotion theory model, IAPS pictures are rated along two dimensions, namely, their valence and arousal. Following this model, biosignals in this paper are initially differentiated according to their valence dimension by means of a data mining approach, which is the C4.5 decision tree algorithm. Then, the valence and the gender information serve as an input to a Mahalanobis distance classifier, which dissects the data into high and low arousing. Results are described in Extensible Markup Language (XML) format, thereby accounting for platform independency, easy interconnectivity, and information exchange. The average recognition (success) rate was 77.68% for the discrimination of four emotional states, differing both in their arousal and valence dimension. It is, therefore, envisaged that the proposed approach holds promise for the efficient discrimination of negative and positive emotions, and it is hereby discussed how future developments may be steered to serve for affective healthcare applications, such as the monitoring of the elderly or chronically ill people.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/titb.2009.2038481

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frantzidis, C. A., Bratsas, C., Klados, M. A., Konstantinidis, E., Lithari, C. D., Vivas, A. B., Papadelis, C. L., Kaldoudi, E., Pappas, C., & Bamidis, P. D.
Affiliations
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of Trento (IT)
  • Democritus University of Thrace (GR)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine
Published
2010-03
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
309-318
ISSN
1089-7771 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120911927
Cited by
166
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
15.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
Keywords
emotion recognition, emotional pictures, International Affective Picture System, valence and arousal, C4.5 decision tree, Mahalanobis distance classifier, autonomic nervous system, elderly monitoring, chronic disease patients, XML data exchange
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Autonomic Nervous System, Central Nervous System, Electroencephalography, Emotions, Evoked Potentials, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Male, Monitoring, Physiologic, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Reproducibility of Results, Recognition, Psychology, Data Mining

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review