Cited by 779Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection

Potential cyberattacks on automated vehicles

Petit, Jonathan, Shladover, Steven E.·2014·IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems

Abstract

Vehicle automation has been one of the fundamental applications within the field of intelligent transportation systems (ITS) since the start of ITS research in the mid-1980s. For most of this time, it has been generally viewed as a futuristic concept that is not close to being ready for deployment. However, recent development of “self-driving” cars and the announcement by car manufacturers of their deployment by 2020 show that this is becoming a reality. The ITS industry has already been focusing much of its attention on the concepts of “connected vehicles” (United States) or “cooperative ITS” (Europe). These concepts are based on communication of data among vehicles (V2V) and/or between vehicles and the infrastructure (V2I/I2V) to provide the information needed to implement ITS applications. The separate threads of automated vehicles and cooperative ITS have not yet been thoroughly woven together, but this will be a necessary step in the near future because the cooperative exchange of data will provide vital inputs to improve the performance and safety of the automation systems. Thus, it is important to start thinking about the cybersecurity implications of cooperative automated vehicle systems. In this paper, we investigate the potential cyberattacks specific to automated vehicles, with their special needs and vulnerabilities. We analyze the threats on autonomous automated vehicles and cooperative automated vehicles. This analysis shows the need for considerably more redund…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tits.2014.2342271

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most severe and likely attacks on autonomous vehicles are GNSS spoofing and injection of fake messages.

    “Petit & Shladover (2014) explore the security issues related to autonomous vehicles and conclude that the most severe and likely attacks are Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) spoofing and injection of fake messages.”

    From Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review (2020) · cites this paper as Petit & Shladover, 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petit, J., & Shladover, S. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Twente (NL)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Published
2014
Pages
1-11
ISSN
  • 1524-9050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0016
OpenAlex
W2099005886
Cited by
779
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 6
FWCI
13.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Keywords
cyberattacks, autonomous vehicles, cooperative intelligent transport systems, connected vehicles, vehicle-to-vehicle communication, vehicle-to-infrastructure communication, cyber threats, system redundancy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review