CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 161Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)

Learning for Vehicle-to-Vehicle Cooperative Perception Under Lossy Communication

Open access
Li, Jinlong, Xu, Runsheng, Liu, Xinyu, Ma, Jin, Chi, Zicheng, Ma, Jiaqi, Yu, Hongkai·2023·IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles
DOI 10.1109/tiv.2023.3260040
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Deep learning has been widely used in intelligent vehicle driving perception systems, such as 3D object detection. One promising technique is Cooperative Perception, which leverages Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) communication to share deep learning-based features among vehicles. However, most cooperative perception algorithms assume ideal communication and do not consider the impact of Lossy Communication (LC), which is very common in the real world, on feature sharing. In this paper, we explore the effects of LC on Cooperative Perception and propose a novel approach to mitigate these effects. Our approach includes an LC-aware Repair Network (LCRN) and a V2V Attention Module (V2VAM) with intra-vehicle attention and uncertainty-aware inter-vehicle attention. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on the public OPV2V dataset (a digital-twin simulated dataset) using point cloud-based 3D object detection. Our results show that our approach improves detection performance under lossy V2V communication. Specifically, our proposed method achieves a significant improvement in Average Precision compared to the state-of-the-art cooperative perception algorithms, which proves the capability of our approach to effectively mitigate the negative impact of LC and enhance the interaction between the ego vehicle and other vehicles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tiv.2023.3260040

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Li et al. proposed an LC-aware repair network (LCRN) and a V2V-AM to mitigate the detrimental influence of lost information and enhance the interaction between vehicles.

    “To alleviate the impact of lost information, Li et al. [76] proposed a novel approach, including an LC-aware repair network (LCRN) and a V2V-AM, to mitigate the detrimental influence and enhance the interaction between vehicles.”

    From Vehicle-to-Everything Communication in Intelligent Connected Vehicles: A Survey and Taxonomy (2025) · cites this paper as [76]

  • Most cooperative perception algorithms assume ideal communication and there is a lack of analysis on the impact of lossy communication on feature sharing.

    “However, most cooperative perception algorithms assume ideal communication and there is a lack of analysis on the impact of lossy communication on feature sharing [76].”

    From Vehicle-to-Everything Communication in Intelligent Connected Vehicles: A Survey and Taxonomy (2025) · cites this paper as [76]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Li, J., Xu, R., Liu, X., Ma, J., Chi, Z., Ma, J., & Yu, H.
Affiliations
  • Cleveland State University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
ORCID
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Published
2023-04
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
2650-2660
ISSN
  • 2379-8858 (ISSN-L)
  • 2379-8904
DOI
10.1109/tiv.2023.3260040
OpenAlex
W4352977781
Cited by
161
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 23
FWCI
11.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • NSF (2215388, CNS-2127881)
  • OpenCDA Ecosystem
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Keywords
vehicle-to-vehicle communication, cooperative perception, lossy communication, 3D object detection, point clouds, feature sharing, attention mechanism, intelligent vehicles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review