The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sentiment Embeddings with Applications to Sentiment Analysis
Abstract
We propose learning sentiment-specific word embeddings dubbed sentiment embeddings in this paper. Existing word embedding learning algorithms typically only use the contexts of words but ignore the sentiment of texts. It is problematic for sentiment analysis because the words with similar contexts but opposite sentiment polarity, such asgoodandbad, are mapped to neighboring word vectors. We address this issue by encoding sentiment information of texts (e.g., sentences and words) together with contexts of words in sentiment embeddings. By combining context and sentiment level evidences, the nearest neighbors in sentiment embedding space are semantically similar and it favors words with the same sentiment polarity. In order to learn sentiment embeddings effectively, we develop a number of neural networks with tailoring loss functions, and collect massive texts automatically with sentiment signals like emoticons as the training data. Sentiment embeddings can be naturally used as word features for a variety of sentiment analysis tasks without feature engineering. We apply sentiment embeddings to word-level sentiment analysis, sentence level sentiment classification, and building sentiment lexicons. Experimental results show that sentiment embeddings consistently outperform context-based embeddings on several benchmark datasets of these tasks. This work provides insights on the design of neural networks for learning task-specific word embeddings in other natural language processing tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 · Cited by 26,568
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 · Cited by 24,533
A unified architecture for natural language processing: deep neural networks with multitask learning
Collobert, R., & Weston, J. (2008) · Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning - ICML '08 · doi:10.1145/1390156.1390177 · Cited by 5,058
Harris, Z. S. (1954) · WORD · doi:10.1080/00437956.1954.11659520 · Cited by 4,807
(1992) · doi:10.5555/176313.176316 · Cited by 2,892
Learning Sentiment-Specific Word Embedding for Twitter Sentiment Classification
Tang, D., Wei, F., Yang, N., Zhou, M., Liu, T., & Qin, B. (2014) · Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-1146 · Cited by 1,181
Self-citation
Cited by
ABCDM: An Attention-based Bidirectional CNN-RNN Deep Model for sentiment analysis
Basiri, M. E., Nemati, S., Abdar, M., Cambria, E., & Acharya, U. R. (2021) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2020.08.005 · Cited by 745
Sentiment Analysis of Comment Texts Based on BiLSTM
Xu, G., Meng, Y., Qiu, X., Yu, Z., & Wu, X. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2909919 · Cited by 649
Naseem, U., Razzak, I., Khan, S. K., & Prasad, M. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing · doi:10.1145/3434237 · Cited by 194
Sentiment analysis: A survey on design framework, applications and future scopes
Bordoloi, M., & Biswas, S. K. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10442-2 · Cited by 183
A survey on aspect-based sentiment classification
Brauwers, G., & Frasincar, F. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3503044 · Cited by 165
Emo2Vec: Learning Generalized Emotion Representation by Multi-task Training
Xu, P., Madotto, A., Wu, C.-S., Park, J. H., & Fung, P. (2018) · Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-6243 · Cited by 83
Domain-specific sentiment analysis: An optimized deep learning approach for the financial markets
Yekrangi, M., & Nikolov, N. S. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3293733 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Tang, D., Wei, F., Qin, B., Yang, N., Liu, T., & Zhou, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
- Published
- 2016-02-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 496-509
- ISSN
- 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2242874043
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 23.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.