The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unsupervised Deep Anomaly Detection for Multi-Sensor Time-Series Signals
Open accessAbstract
Nowadays, multi-sensor technologies are applied in many fields, e.g., Health Care (HC), Human Activity Recognition (HAR), and Industrial Control System (ICS). These sensors can generate a substantial amount of multivariate time-series data. Unsupervised anomaly detection on multi-sensor time-series data has been proven critical in machine learning researches. The key challenge is to discover generalized normal patterns by capturing spatial-temporal correlation in multi-sensor data. Beyond this challenge, the noisy data is often intertwined with the training data, which is likely to mislead the model by making it hard to distinguish between the normal, abnormal, and noisy data. Few of previous researches can jointly address these two challenges. In this paper, we propose a novel deep learning-based anomaly detection algorithm called Deep Convolutional Autoencoding Memory network (CAE-M). We first build a Deep Convolutional Autoencoder to characterize spatial dependence of multi-sensor data with a Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) to better distinguish between the noisy, normal, and abnormal data. Then, we construct a Memory Network consisting of linear (Autoregressive Model) and non-linear predictions (Bidirectional LSTM with Attention) to capture temporal dependence from time-series data. Finally, CAE-M jointly optimizes these two subnetworks. We empirically compare the proposed approach with several state-of-the-art anomaly detection methods on HAR and HC datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed model outperforms these existing methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modeling
Chung, J., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.3555 · Cited by 11,008
Nonlinear Component Analysis as a Kernel Eigenvalue Problem
Schölkopf, B., Smola, A., & Müller, K.-R. (1998) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976698300017467 · Cited by 8,084
Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders
Vincent, P., Larochelle, H., Bengio, Y., & Manzagol, P.-A. (2008) · Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning - ICML '08 · doi:10.1145/1390156.1390294 · Cited by 7,436
Hamilton, J. D. (1994) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691218632 · Cited by 7,293
Greff, K., Srivastava, R. K., Koutnik, J., Steunebrink, B. R., & Schmidhuber, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2016.2582924 · Cited by 6,955
Estimating the Support of a High-Dimensional Distribution
Schölkopf, B., Platt, J. C., Shawe-Taylor, J., Smola, A. J., & Williamson, R. C. (2001) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976601750264965 · Cited by 6,168
Long-term recurrent convolutional networks for visual recognition and description
Donahue, J., Hendricks, L. A., Guadarrama, S., Rohrbach, M., Venugopalan, S., Darrell, T., & Saenko, K. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298878 · Cited by 5,228
Support Vector Data Description
Tax, D. M. J., & Duin, R. P. W. (2004) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/b:mach.0000008084.60811.49 · Cited by 3,512
Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Review
Pang, G., Shen, C., Cao, L., & Hengel, A. V. D. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3439950 · Cited by 2,837
Modeling Long- and Short-Term Temporal Patterns with Deep Neural Networks
Lai, G., Chang, W.-C., Yang, Y., & Liu, H. (2018) · The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3209978.3210006 · Cited by 2,152
Cited by
UMMAFormer: A Universal Multimodal-adaptive Transformer Framework for Temporal Forgery Localization
Zhang, R., Wang, H., Du, M., Liu, H., Zhou, Y., & Zeng, Q. (2023) · Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/3581783.3613767 · Cited by 42
ICS anomaly detection based on sensor patterns and actuator rules in spatiotemporal dependency
Cai, J., Wei, Z., & Luo, J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2024.3393528 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Wang, J., & Pan, Z.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
- Published
- 2021
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2191
- 2326-3865
- OpenAlex
- W3190748826
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 15.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unsupervised Deep Anomaly Detection for Multi-Sensor Time-Series Signals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tkde.2021.3102110
- The paper
- Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Wang, J., & Pan, Z. (2021). Unsupervised Deep Anomaly Detection for Multi-Sensor Time-Series Signals. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2021.3102110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.