CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 48Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningEducational Games and GamificationArtificial Intelligence in Games

Annie: Automated Generation of Adaptive Learner Guidance for Fun Serious Games

Thomas, J M, Young, R M·2010·IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies
DOI 10.1109/tlt.2010.32
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper describes some of the difficulties inherent in building intelligent educational games, specifically the challenge of integrating pedagogy with core game play. We introduce a plan-based knowledge representation that provides a novel framework for infusing the core mechanics of a game with pedagogical content. We describe, in detail, a system that leverages this framework to dynamically adapt a game to individual learners at runtime.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tlt.2010.32

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI has assisted the integration of the game and knowledge domain, and the further potential is making the game adapt to learners' behaviours and affections dynamically.

    “AI has assisted the integration of the game and knowledge domain, and the further potential is making the game adapt to the learners' behaviours and affections dynamically [57].”

    From A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education from 2010 to 2020 (2021) · cites this paper as [57]

  • Another ethical debate was conspicuously found in gamification that emphasis should be put on learning and tend to 'suck the fun out' of games, or on gameplay 'suck out the learning'.

    “Another ethical debate was conspicuously found in gamification that emphasis should be put on learning and tend to”

    From A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education from 2010 to 2020 (2021) · cites this paper as [57]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Thomas, J. M., & Young, R. M.
Affiliations
North Carolina State University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Published
2010-10
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
329-343
ISSN
1939-1382 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1109/tlt.2010.32
OpenAlex
W2129194012
Cited by
48
References
31
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplorehelp/downloads/license-information/IEEE.html (vor)
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
Keywords
serious games, game mechanics, personalized learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review