Cited by 119Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningStudent Assessment and FeedbackMathematics Education and Pedagogy

Effects of feedback elaboration and feedback timing during computer-based practice in mathematics problem solving

Open access
Attali, Yigal, van der Kleij, Fabienne·2017·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.012

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Attali, Y., & van der Kleij, F.
Affiliations
Educational Testing Service (US)
Corresponding author
Attali, Yigal
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
110
Issue
13
Pages
154-169
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2603956104
Cited by
119
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
feedback timing, mathematical problem solving, multiple-choice questions, constructed-response items, item format, initial ability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review