The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A common formalism for the Integral formulations of the forward EEG problem
Open accessAbstract
The forward electroencephalography (EEG) problem involves finding a potential V from the Poisson equation inverted Delta x (sigma inverted Delta V) f, in which f represents electrical sources in the brain, and sigma the conductivity of the head tissues. In the piecewise constant conductivity head model, this can be accomplished by the boundary element method (BEM) using a suitable integral formulation. Most previous work uses the same integral formulation, corresponding to a double-layer potential. In this paper we present a conceptual framework based on a well-known theorem (Theorem 1) that characterizes harmonic functions defined on the complement of a bounded smooth surface. This theorem says that such harmonic functions are completely defined by their values and those of their normal derivatives on this surface. It allows us to cast the previous BEM approaches in a unified setting and to develop two new approaches corresponding to different ways of exploiting the same theorem. Specifically, we first present a dual approach which involves a single-layer potential. Then, we propose a symmetric formulation, which combines single- and double-layer potentials, and which is new to the field of EEG, although it has been applied to other problems in electromagnetism. The three methods have been evaluated numerically using a spherical geometry with known analytical solution, and the symmetric formulation achieves a significantly higher accuracy than the alternative methods. Additionally, we present results with realistically shaped meshes. Beside providing a better understanding of the foundations of BEM methods, our approach appears to lead also to more efficient algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data
Hamalainen, M. S., & Sarvas, J. (1989) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.16463 · Cited by 989
Cited by
Spatial and temporal resolutions of EEG: Is it really black and white? A scalp current density view
Burle, B., Spieser, L., Roger, C., Casini, L., Hasbroucq, T., & Vidal, F. (2015) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.05.004 · Cited by 414
Measuring MEG Closer to the Brain: Performance of on-Scalp Sensor Arrays
Iivanainen, J., Stenroos, M., & Parkkonen, L. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.048 · Cited by 296
“Thus, the field computation for normal-component-measuring OPMs could potentially be done with a LC BEM, which is computationally lighter than the more accurate solvers such as LG BEM or symmetric BEM (Kybic et al., 2005).”
Time-frequency mixed-norm estimates: Sparse M/EEG imaging with non-stationary source activations
Gramfort, A., Strohmeier, D., Haueisen, J., Hämäläinen, M. S., & Kowalski, M. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.051 · Cited by 234
Differences in unity: The go/no-go and stop signal tasks rely on different mechanisms
Raud, L., Westerhausen, R., Dooley, N., & Huster, R. J. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116582 · Cited by 199
Hill, A. T., Rogasch, N. C., Fitzgerald, P. B., & Hoy, K. E. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.001 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Kybic, J., Clerc, M., Abboud, T., Faugeras, O., Keriven, R., & Papadopoulo, T.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 12-28
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2150469050
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A common formalism for the Integral formulations of the forward EEG problem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmi.2004.837363
- The paper
- Kybic, J., Clerc, M., Abboud, T., Faugeras, O., Keriven, R., & Papadopoulo, T. (2005). A common formalism for the Integral formulations of the forward EEG problem. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2004.837363
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.