The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 34 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Anatomically Constrained Neural Networks (ACNNs): Application to Cardiac Image Enhancement and Segmentation
Open accessAbstract
Incorporation of prior knowledge about organ shape and location is key to improve performance of image analysis approaches. In particular, priors can be useful in cases where images are corrupted and contain artefacts due to limitations in image acquisition. The highly constrained nature of anatomical objects can be well captured with learning-based techniques. However, in most recent and promising techniques such as CNN-based segmentation it is not obvious how to incorporate such prior knowledge. State-of-the-art methods operate as pixel-wise classifiers where the training objectives do not incorporate the structure and inter-dependencies of the output. To overcome this limitation, we propose a generic training strategy that incorporates anatomical prior knowledge into CNNs through a new regularisation model, which is trained end-to-end. The new framework encourages models to follow the global anatomical properties of the underlying anatomy (e.g. shape, label structure) via learnt non-linear representations of the shape. We show that the proposed approach can be easily adapted to different analysis tasks (e.g. image enhancement, segmentation) and improve the prediction accuracy of the state-of-the-art models. The applicability of our approach is shown on multi-modal cardiac data sets and public benchmarks. In addition, we demonstrate how the learnt deep models of 3-D shapes can be interpreted and used as biomarkers for classification of cardiac pathologies.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper proposes anatomically constrained neural networks (ACNN), a generic end-to-end training strategy that uses a stacked convolutional autoencoder and T-L network to impose learnt anatomical shape priors on CNN predictions. It demonstrates improved cardiac MR segmentation, 3D ultrasound segmentation, MR super-resolution, and pathology classification over state-of-the-art baselines.
Key findings
- For cardiac cine-MR segmentation, ACNN-Seg improved endocardium Dice to .939 ± .017 versus .908 ± .021 for 2D-FCN, and myocardium Dice to .811 ± .027 versus .727 ± .046; mean surface distances were also lower (endocardium 1.37 ± 0.42 mm vs 2.07 ± 0.61 mm; myocardium 1.14 ± 0.22 mm vs 1.58 ± 0.44 mm), with p < 0.001 for Dice and mean distance.
- On the CETUS’14 3D-US benchmark, ACNN-Seg achieved end-diastole Dice .912 ± .023 versus .906 ± .026 for FCN and .894 ± .041 for BEAS, and end-systole Dice .873 ± .051 versus .872 ± .050 for FCN and .856 ± .057 for BEAS; Hausdorff distance at ED was 6.96 ± 1.75 mm versus 11.94 ± 9.46 mm for FCN.
- For cardiac MR super-resolution, ACNN-SR achieved SSIM .796 ± .041 versus .783 ± .046 for SR-CNN, clinician MOS scores of 4.36 ± 0.62 and 4.25 ± .68 versus 3.59 ± 1.05 and 3.85 ± .70, and inference time .06 s versus .29 s.
- For pathology classification, T-L codes gave 83.3% accuracy from ED phase and 91.6% with ED+ES, compared with PCA codes at 76.6% and 86.6%, using 10-fold cross-validation on 60 CMR sequences.
Methods
- ACNN adds a shape-regularisation loss to standard CNN training: segmentation uses cross-entropy plus a low-dimensional shape loss and weight decay, while super-resolution uses smooth ℓ1 reconstruction plus a global shape loss and weight decay. The regulariser is a stacked convolutional autoencoder and T-L network that learns 64-dimensional anatomical shape/label representations; it is used only during training, not inference.
- Data include the UK Digital Heart Project dataset of 1200 cine 2D stack and 3D HR cardiac MR image pairs, split into 900 training, 100 validation, and 200 testing for segmentation, and 1000 training / 200 testing for super-resolution; CETUS’14 with 45 3D+time ultrasound sequences from 15 healthy subjects and 30 patients, evaluated blinded on 30 test sequences; and ACDC MICCAI’17 with 20 cine stacks per class for classification.
- Comparisons include 2D-FCN, 3D-UNet, AE-Seg, 3D-Seg, BEAS, FCN, and SR-CNN; metrics include Dice, mean and Hausdorff surface distances, SSIM, mean opinion score, ejection-fraction correlation/bias, and classification accuracy, with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for top methods.
Limitations
- The paper states that 3D-US training data were limited to 15 image sequences; segmentation results could improve by segmenting ED and ES frames simultaneously or using temporal information such as optical flow; classification accuracy could improve by training the AE and T-L models with a classification objective; and achieving the best possible segmentation accuracy was not the main focus.
- The paper also notes that the T-L regulariser is used only at training time, that latent codes are expected to be correlated because the decoder merges codes across spatial dimensions, and that a variational autoencoder was not used because the K-L term would reduce representation power and generative sampling was not needed.
- Evident from the text: the method is evaluated on cardiac applications only, and the authors state future work will extend ACNN to tasks such as human pose estimation and landmark localisation.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 34 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“(II) An implicit statistical parametrisation of the left ventricular shape via NNs for pathology classification;”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The applicability of our approach is shown on multi-modal cardiac datasets and public benchmarks.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Our evaluation shows: (I) A sub-pixel cardiac MR image segmentation approach that, in contrast to previous CNN approaches [44], [2], is robust against slice misalignment and coverage problems;”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [44] [44] P. V. Tran. A fully convolutional neural network for cardiac segmentation in short-axis MRI. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.00494 , 2016. - source
- Not matchedcites [2] [2] M. Avendi, A. Kheradvar, and H. Jafarkhani. A combined deep-learning and deformable-model approach to fully automatic segmentation of the left ventricle in cardiac MRI. MedIA , 30:108-119, 2016. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We show that the proposed approach can be easily adapted to different analysis tasks ( e.g. image enhancement, segmentation) and improve the prediction accuracy of the state-of-the-art models.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The main contribution of ACNN model over the standard FCN approaches is the improved shape delineation of the LV, as it can be seen in terms of the distance error metrics.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: The CETUS web platform evaluation is a valid blinded benchmark for segmentation accuracy.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Slice by slice analysis [2], [44] significantly under-performs compared to the proposed subpixel and ACNN-Seg segmentation methods.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [2] [2] M. Avendi, A. Kheradvar, and H. Jafarkhani. A combined deep-learning and deformable-model approach to fully automatic segmentation of the left ventricle in cardiac MRI. MedIA , 30:108-119, 2016. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked yetcites [44] [44] P. V. Tran. A fully convolutional neural network for cardiac segmentation in short-axis MRI. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.00494 , 2016. - source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: The HR ground-truth label maps projected from HR image space are an accurate reference for segmentation evaluation.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In particular, the dice score metrics are observed to be lower since 2D analysis can yield poor performance in basal and apical parts of the heart as shown in Fig. 6.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: The HR ground-truth label maps projected from HR image space are an accurate reference for segmentation evaluation.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Instead of applying these two gradient descent updates sequentially in an iterative fashion, we perform a joint update training scheme and experimentally observed better convergence.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The experimental results, given in Table II, show that neural network models outperforms previous state-of-theart approaches in this public benchmark dataset although the training data size was limited to 15 image sequences.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: The CETUS web platform evaluation is a valid blinded benchmark for segmentation accuracy.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As can be seen in the bottom row of Fig. 6, without the learnt shape priors, label map predictions are more prone to imaging artefacts.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 34
- The quote only partly states this claim. 5
- Probably not a substantial claim. 16
In the paper
“We show that the proposed segmentation and SR models become more robust against imaging artefacts mentioned earlier which is underlined by our state-of-the-art results on the MICCAI'14 CETUS public benchmark [8].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] [8] O. Bernard, J. G. Bosch, B. Heyde, M. Alessandrini, D. Barbosa, S. Camarasu-Pop, F. Cervenansky, S. Valette, O. Mirea, M. Bernier, et al. Standardized evaluation system for left ventricular segmentation algorithms in 3D echocardiography. IEEE TMI , 35(4):967-977, 2016. - source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“(III) An image SR technique that extends previous work [34] and that is robust against slice misalignments;”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [34] [34] O. Oktay, W. Bai, M. Lee, R. Guerrero, K. Kamnitsas, J. Caballero, A. de Marvao, S. Cook, D. ORegan, and D. Rueckert. Multi-input cardiac image super-resolution using convolutional neural networks. In International Conference on MICCAI , pages 246-254. Springer, 2016. - source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“our approach is computationally more efficient than the state-of-the-art SR-CNN model [34] as the feature extraction is performed in the low-dimensional image space.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [34] [34] O. Oktay, W. Bai, M. Lee, R. Guerrero, K. Kamnitsas, J. Caballero, A. de Marvao, S. Cook, D. ORegan, and D. Rueckert. Multi-input cardiac image super-resolution using convolutional neural networks. In International Conference on MICCAI , pages 246-254. Springer, 2016. - source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“ACNN-Seg | 1.37 ± 0.42 | 7.89 ± 3.83 | .939 ± .017 | 1.14 ± 0.22 | 7.31 ± 3.59 | .811 ± .027 | 1 . 60 × 10 6 |”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Rests on an assumption: The high-resolution motion-free cardiac MR images provide an appropriate reference for evaluating segmentation performance on low-resolution 2D stacks.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is observed that the learnt latent representations in general follow a normal distribution and they are not separated in multi-clusters ( e.g. mixture of Gaussians).”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In particular, Hausdorff distances were reduced significantly”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
- Rests on an assumption: The CETUS web platform evaluation is a valid blinded benchmark for segmentation accuracy.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Previous slice by slice segmentation approaches validated their methods on LR annotations; however, we see that the produced label maps are far off from the true underlying ventricular geometry and it can be a limiting factor for the analysis of ventricle morphology.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The HR ground-truth label maps projected from HR image space are an accurate reference for segmentation evaluation.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similarly, we observed an improvement in terms of normalised Dice score, which was quantitatively not significant due to large volumetric size of the LV cavity.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Rests on an assumption: The CETUS web platform evaluation is a valid blinded benchmark for segmentation accuracy.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is observed that the ACNN approach ensures better consistency between frames although none of the methods have used temporal information.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Rests on an assumption: The CETUS web platform evaluation is a valid blinded benchmark for segmentation accuracy.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We also analysed the performance change in AE-Seg with respect to the number of parameters, which shows that the small capacity AE-Seg model ( 8 × 10 4 pars) is not suitable for cardiac image segmentation as the second stage in the cascaded model does not improve the performance significantly.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The HR ground-truth label maps projected from HR image space are an accurate reference for segmentation evaluation.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We observed that reconstruction of label-maps from low dimensional representations was limited since the ventricle boundaries were not delineated properly but rather a rough segmentation was generated (DSC: . 734 ).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The HR ground-truth label maps projected from HR image space are an accurate reference for segmentation evaluation.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the segmentation problem, the Sorensen-Dice loss was tested in the experiments as an alternative to the cross-entropy loss, yet we observed a degraded performance since the latter is a smoother function.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By including the codes from ES phase, the classification accuracies were improved to 86 . 6% vs 91 . 6% .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Rests on an assumption: The HR ground-truth label maps projected from HR image space are an accurate reference for segmentation evaluation.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We used 10 -fold cross-validation on 60 CMR sequences and obtained 76 . 6% vs 83 . 3% accuracy using PCA and T-L codes extracted from ED phase.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The HR ground-truth label maps projected from HR image space are an accurate reference for segmentation evaluation.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“It is also observed to be more memory efficient compared to the standard 3D-UNet architecture [12].”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [11] [11] H. Chen, Y. Zheng, J.-H. Park, P.-A. Heng, and S. K. Zhou. Iterative multi-domain regularized deep learning for anatomical structure detection and segmentation from ultrasound images. In International Conference on MICCAI , pages 487-495. Springer, 2016. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [12] [12] ¨ O. C ¸ ic ¸ek, A. Abdulkadir, S. S. Lienkamp, T. Brox, and O. Ronneberger. 3D U-Net: Learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation. In Proceedings of MICCAI , pages 424-432. Springer, 2016. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The proposed global training objective in SR corresponds to a prior on the space of feasible high-resolution (HR) solutions, which is experimentally shown to be useful since SR is an illposed problem.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In particular, priors can be useful in cases where images are corrupted and contain artefacts due to limitations in image acquisition.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In that regard, the proposed method is not only useful for image enhancement and segmentation but also for the study of anatomical shape variations in population studies and their associations with cardiac related pathologies.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Our framework learns a non-linear compact representation of the underlying anatomy through a stacked convolutional autoencoder [31] and enforces network predictions to follow the learnt statistical shape/label distributions.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] [31] J. Masci, U. Meier, D. Cires ¸an, and J. Schmidhuber. Stacked convolutional auto-encoders for hierarchical feature extraction. In International - Conference on Artificial Neural Networks , pages 52-59. Springer, 2011. -
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More importantly, our approach is independent of the particular NN architecture or application; it can be combined with any of the state-of-the-art segmentation or super-resolution (SR) NN models and potentially improve its prediction accuracy and robustness without introducing any memory or computational complexity at inference time.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“We also demonstrate that the lower dimensional representations learnt by the proposed ACNN can be useful for classification of pathologies such as dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and it does not require point-wise correspondence search between subjects as in [39].”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [39] [39] M. Shakeri, H. Lombaert, S. Tripathi, S. Kadoury, A. D. N. Initiative, et al. Deep spectral-based shape features for Alzheimers disease classification. In SASHIMI , pages 15-24. Springer, 2016. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Similarly, 3D-US is recommended over the use of 2D-US since it has been demonstrated to provide more accurate and reproducible volumetric measurements [25].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [25] [25] R. M. Lang, L. P. Badano, W. Tsang, D. H. Adams, E. Agricola, T. Buck, F. F. Faletra, A. Franke, J. Hung, L. P. de Isla, et al. EAE/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using three-dimensional echocardiography. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography , 25(1):3-46, 2012. -
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More importantly, our approach is independent of the particular NN architecture or application; it can be combined with any of the state-of-the-art segmentation or super-resolution (SR) NN models and potentially improve its prediction accuracy and robustness without introducing any memory or computational complexity at inference time.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Using the proposed approach we can perform full 3D segmentation without explicit motion correction and do not have to rely on LR slice-by-slice 2D segmentation.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In [1], Alain and Bengio showed that the denoising reconstruction error is equivalent to contractive penalty, which forces the feature extraction (encoder) function f resist perturbations of the input and contracts these input samples to similar low dimensional codes.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] [1] G. Alain and Y. Bengio. What regularized auto-encoders learn from the data-generating distribution. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 15(1):3563-3593, 2014. -
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As for the case of image segmentation, learnt shape representations can be used to regularise image SR, constraining the model to make only anatomically meaningful predictions.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“It provides two main advantages over the state-of-the-art medical image SR model proposed in [34]: (I) the network generates image features in the LR image grid rather than early upsampling of the features, which reduces memory and computation requirements significantly.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [34] [34] O. Oktay, W. Bai, M. Lee, R. Guerrero, K. Kamnitsas, J. Caballero, A. de Marvao, S. Cook, D. ORegan, and D. Rueckert. Multi-input cardiac image super-resolution using convolutional neural networks. In International Conference on MICCAI , pages 246-254. Springer, 2016. - source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The given penalty function promotes the network to learn the underlying low-dimensional data manifold and capture its local smooth structure.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The experimental results were evaluated in a blinded fashion by uploading the generated segmentations from separate 30 sequences into the CETUS web platform.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Low dimensional encoding enables us to train models with global characteristics but also yields better generalisation power for the underlying anatomy as shown in earlier work [43].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [43] [43] A. Torralba and Y. Weiss. Small codes and large image databases for recognition. In Proceedings of CVPR , pages 1-8. IEEE, 2008. - source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition to the smoothness of the latent distributions, the extracted codes are expected to be correlated since the decoder merges some of the codes along the three spatial dimensions to construct input feature maps for the transposed convolutions, but this characteristic is not a limitation in our study.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Image SR is an ill-posed problem as there are an infinite number of solutions for a given input sample but only a few would be anatomically meaningful and accurate.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition to imposing shape regularisation, this parametrisation encourages label consistency in model predictions, and reduces false-positive detections as they can influence the predicted codes in the hidden layer.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“global regularisation reduces the amount of spurious false positive predictions and enforces abnormal LV segmentation shapes to fit into the learnt representation model.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is important to note that the T-L regulariser model is used only at training time but not during inference; in other words, the fully convolutional (FCN) segmentation and super-resolution models can still be used for applications using different image sizes.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, we believe that adversarial training comes at the expense of less interpretability of the regularisation term and unstable model training behaviour, which still remains an open research problem.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In SR application, AL enables the SR network to hallucinate fine texture detail, and the synthesized HR images appear qualitatively more realistic. However, at the same time the PSNR and SSIM scores are usually worse.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] [26] C. Ledig, L. Theis, F. Husz´ ar, J. Caballero, A. Cunningham, A. Acosta, A. Aitken, A. Tejani, J. Totz, Z. Wang, et al. Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.04802 , 2016. -
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The proposed regulariser model can be seen as an application-specific training objective.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The 3DSeg approach uses the convolution kernels more efficiently without requiring the model to output a high-dimensional intensity image.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The clinical HR images used as reference for SR evaluation are accurate ground truth.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The presented ACNN framework is not only limited to the medical image segmentation and SR tasks but can be extended to other image analysis tasks where prior knowledge can provide model guidance and robustness.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Such approaches have been used successfully in natural image super-resolution (SR) [26] and segmentation [30] tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] [26] C. Ledig, L. Theis, F. Husz´ ar, J. Caballero, A. Cunningham, A. Acosta, A. Aitken, A. Tejani, J. Totz, Z. Wang, et al. Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.04802 , 2016. - source
- Not checked yetcites [30] [30] P. Luc, C. Couprie, S. Chintala, and J. Verbeek. Semantic segmentation using adversarial networks. In NIPS Workshop on Adversarial Training , 2016. - source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“For this reason, the authors of [26] have pointed out that adversarial training may not be suitable for medical applications, where the accuracy and fidelity of the visual content more important than the qualitative appearance of the HR images.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] [26] C. Ledig, L. Theis, F. Husz´ ar, J. Caballero, A. Cunningham, A. Acosta, A. Aitken, A. Tejani, J. Totz, Z. Wang, et al. Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.04802 , 2016. -
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the additional K-L divergence term (constraint) would reduce the representation power of the AE; thus, the local anatomical variations would not be captured in detail.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additionally, non-linear layers are not applied on the lower dimensional latent representations since that would further constrain the autoencoder.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More importantly, cascaded approaches add additional computational complexity due to the increased number of filters, which could be redundant given that the standard segmentation model is able to capture shape properties of the organs as long as it has a large receptive field and is optimised with shape constraints.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast to this, our AE model is trained solely on cardiac segmentation masks and features are customised to identify anatomical variations observed in the heart chambers.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The high-resolution motion-free cardiac MR images provide an appropriate reference for evaluating segmentation performance on low-resolution 2D stacks.
“Since the ground-truth information is obtained from the HR motionfree images, the experimental results are expected to reflect the performance of the method with respect to an appropriate reference.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A perfect mapping between intensity and label spaces is practically not achievable.
“Since a perfect mapping between the intensity and label spaces is practically not achievable, the T-L learnt codes are expected to be more representative due to the inclusion of additional information.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Anatomical objects in medical images are naturally more constrained in shape and location than objects in natural images.
“Inclusion of priors in medical imaging could potentially have much more impact compared to their use in natural image analysis since anatomical objects in medical images are naturally more constrained in terms of their shape and location.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The proposed ACNN is one of the earliest studies demonstrating the use of convolutional autoencoder networks to learn anatomical shape variations from medical images.
“More importantly, to the best of our knowledge, this is one of the earliest studies demonstrating the use of convolutional autoencoder networks to learn anatomical shape variations from medical images.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The HR ground-truth label maps projected from HR image space are an accurate reference for segmentation evaluation.
“The corresponding groundtruth label maps, however, are projected from the HR image space, which are annotated in the HR image grid.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The clinical HR images used as reference for SR evaluation are accurate ground truth.
“The quality of the upsampled images is evaluated in terms of SSIM metric [47] between the clinical HR image data and reconstructed HR images.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The two expert cardiologists' MOS ratings reliably quantify image quality.
“Two expert cardiologists were asked to rate the upsampled images from 1 (very poor) to 5 (excellent) based on the accuracy of the reconstructed LV boundary and geometry.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The CETUS web platform evaluation is a valid blinded benchmark for segmentation accuracy.
“The experimental results were evaluated in a blinded fashion by uploading the generated segmentations from separate 30 sequences into the CETUS web platform.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 2D stack LR images are a commonly used acquisition protocol for cardiac imaging.
“only the 2D stack LR images are used, which is a commonly used acquisition protocol for cardiac imaging”
The paper relies on this without support.
The LV blood pool is larger than the myocardium.
“due to the larger size of the LV blood pool compared to the myocardium.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the authors report performance superior to 3D-ACNN Oktay et al. (2017), achieving 4.3% increase in Dice and 4.15mm (40% less) improvement in Hausdorff distance .”
From Embracing imperfect datasets: A review of deep learning solutions for medical image segmentation (2020) · cites this paper as Oktay et al. (2017)
In the citing paper
“The authors attribute the inferior performance by Ravishankar et al. (2017) to over-regularization, which they have overcome by replacing CDAE with a frozen encoder during training.”
From Embracing imperfect datasets: A review of deep learning solutions for medical image segmentation (2020) · cites this paper as Oktay et al. (2017)
In the citing paper
“The suggested model achieves 1.2% and 2.0% improvement respectively in Dice over Ravishankar et al. (2017) for 3D endocardium and myocardium segmentation on a cine-MR dataset (1000 training and 200 testing).”
From Embracing imperfect datasets: A review of deep learning solutions for medical image segmentation (2020) · cites this paper as Oktay et al. (2017)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Cross-entropy and Euclidean gradients have their roles reversed
MinorThe text defines cross-entropy as the segmentation-reconstruction loss and Euclidean distance as the loss matching the predictor's latent codes. It then assigns the predictor-matching role to the first gradient, ∂L x, and the reconstruction role to the second, ∂L h-the reverse of those definitions.
“The first gradient encourages the encoder to generate codes that could be easily extracted by the predictor while the second gradient making sure that a good segmentation-reconstruction can be obtained at the output of the decoder.”
“In the first stage, the AE is trained separately with ground-truth segmentation masks and cross-entropy loss L x . Later, the predictor model is trained to match the learnt latent space h by minimising the Euclidean distance L h between the codes predicted by the AE and predictor as shown in Fig. 3.”
Citations
Cites
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 114,148 · cited 4×
“In that regard, our model differentiates from the VGG-Net [42] feature based training objectives [26], [21].”
MethodInfluentialU-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404 · cited 6×
“In that regard, the proposed SR model and U-Net segmentation models are concatenated to obtain HR segmentation results.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialImage quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892 · cited 1×
“The quality of the upsampled images is evaluated in terms of SSIM metric [47] between the clinical HR image data and reconstructed HR images.”
MethodFully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Long, J., Shelhamer, E., & Darrell, T. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298965 · Cited by 38,834 · cited 1×
“In CNN based segmentation models [22], [29], [38], this task is performed by learning a discriminative function that models the underlying conditional probability distribution P(ys |x).”
MethodA survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
Litjens, G., Kooi, T., Bejnordi, B. E., Setio, A. A. A., Ciompi, F., Ghafoorian, M., van der Laak, J. A. W. M., van Ginneken, B., & Sánchez, C. I. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005 · Cited by 15,332 · cited 2×
“As explained in a recent NN survey paper [28], the majority of the classification and regression models utilise a pixel-”
BackgroundConditional Random Fields: Probabilistic Models for Segmenting and Labeling Sequence Data
Lafferty, J., McCallum, A., & Pereira, F. C. N. (2001) · ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) · Cited by 12,935
Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network
Ledig, C., Theis, L., Huszar, F., Caballero, J., Cunningham, A., Acosta, A., Aitken, A., Tejani, A., Totz, J., Wang, Z., et al. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.19 · Cited by 12,696 · cited 5×
“ture based training objectives [21], [26].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationPhoto-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network
Ledig, C., Theis, L., Huszár, F., Caballero, J., Cunningham, A., Acosta, A., Aitken, A., Tejani, A., Totz, J., Wang, Z.-H., et al. (2016) · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.04802 · Cited by 12,624
Self-citationPerceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolution
Johnson, J., Alahi, A., & Fei-Fei, L. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46475-6_43 · Cited by 11,283 · cited 3×
“Similar modifications of the objective function during training have been introduced to enhance the quality of natural images, such as perceptual [21] and adversarial [26] loss terms, which were used to synthesise more realistic images in terms of texture and object boundaries.”
Method3D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotation
Çiçek, Ö., Abdulkadir, A., Lienkamp, S. S., Brox, T., & Ronneberger, O. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_49 · Cited by 7,945
Flagged first, then by citations
7 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 758
AGAN: An Anatomy Corrector Conditional Generative Adversarial Network
Engin, M., Lange, R., Nemes, A., et al. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59713-9_68 · Cited by 4
Denoising of Magnetic Resonance Images with Deep Neural Regularizer Driven by Image Prior
Zhu, Y., Pan, X., Zhu, J. H., Li, L., & Liu, Y. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) · doi:10.1109/dsaa49011.2020.00038 · Cited by 4
Jabbar, S. I., Aladi, A. Q., Day, C. R., et al. (2021) · Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express · doi:10.1088/2057-1976/ac0dce · Cited by 4
Artificial Intelligence-Based Image Reconstruction in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
Qin, C., & Rueckert, D. (2022) · Contemporary medical imaging · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-92087-6_14 · Cited by 6
“DL-based methods have also led to significant improvement across various applications in cardiac imaging, such as cardiac image segmentation [9, 3], myocardial motion tracking [11, 41, 46] and image enhancement [35, 34].”
Self-citationA Review of the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: From Data to Personalised Models
Blagojević, A., & Geroski, T. (2023) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29717-5_17 · Cited by 5
Yang, Y., Yu, W., Du, H., Li, L., Feng, Q., Tu, S., & Yang, W. (2023) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2023.3321788 · Cited by 4
Girum, K. B., Skandarani, Y., Hussain, R., et al. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68107-4_39 · Cited by 4
“To extend this approach, shape prior based deep learning methods could help constrain the segmentation of the anatomical structures [9,10,11].”
MethodDing, J. S. (2021) · Microprocessors and Microsystems · doi:10.1016/j.micpro.2021.103916 · Cited by 4
RetractedMulti-Structure Deep Segmentation With Shape Priors And Latent Adversarial Regularization
Boutillon, A., Borotikar, B., Pons, C., et al. (2021) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi48211.2021.9434104 · Cited by 4
“We compared the convergence in latent shape space of the shape priors based regularization [7] and our proposed shape priors based adversarial regularization.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialPerformance Improvement of Convolutional Neural Network Using Random Under Sampling
Ghosh, K., Sarkar, A., Banerjee, A., & Chatterjee, S. (2021) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-9433-5_20 · Cited by 4
EnMcGAN: Adversarial Ensemble Learning for 3D Complete Renal Structures Segmentation
He, Y., Ge, R., Qi, X., Yang, G., Chen, Y., Kong, Y., Shu, H., Coatrieux, J.-L., & Li, S. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78191-0_36 · Cited by 4
“The shape regularisation utilizes the shape knowledge learned by an additional model to encourage the CNN extracting higher-order shape features [13, 16, 10].”
MethodA Segmentation Model of Lung Parenchyma in Chest CT Based on ResUnet
Liu, B., Ye, C., Yang, P., Miao, Z., Liu, R., & Chen, Y. (2022) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing (ICMLC) · doi:10.1145/3529836.3529917 · Cited by 4
“Inspired by CNN, many CNN-based architectures have been successfully used to segment various organs and abnormalities in medical images [8–10].”
MethodUpendra, R. R., & Linte, C. A. (2022) · Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · doi:10.1109/embc48229.2022.9871783 · Cited by 4
“While some researchers proposed to use 3D CNN architectures to enhance the resolution of cine cardiac MRI images [15], [16], limited efforts have been made to improve the resolution of LGE cardiac MRI images [17].”
BackgroundWeakly Supervised Segmentation by a Deep Geodesic Prior
Mortazi, A., Khosravan, N., Torigian, D. A., Kurugol, S., & Bağcı, U. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32692-0_28 · Cited by 4
“Error functions, respectively. 2.2 Learning a Geodesic Prior Most existing literature related to prior incorporation into segmentation utilize accurate binary labels for extracting shape information [9,12]. Unlike the mainstream studies, we propose to use geodesic maps to increase robustness of the priors when dealing…”
MethodInfluentialAdversarial Learning for Deformable Image Registration: Application to 3D Ultrasound Image Fusion
Li, Z., & Ogino, M. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32875-7_7 · Cited by 4
Wei, H., Xue, W., & Ni, D. (2019) · doi:10.1145/3364836.3364881 · Cited by 4
“ACNN [1] uses the autoencoder to learn the anatomical structure information of the label and obtains a high-dimensional vector representation.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialYoung, J. C., Afriliana, N., Natalia, F., et al. (2019) · International Conference on New Media Studies (CONMEDIA) · doi:10.1109/conmedia46929.2019.8981855 · Cited by 4
“As a result, research in this field has shifted its focus to using more contemporary techniques such as convolution neural networks [1].”
3D Consistent & Robust Segmentation of Cardiac Images by Deep Learning with Spatial PropagationPreprint
Zheng, Q., Delingette, H., Duchateau, N., et al. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1804.09400 · Cited by 4
“In [9], the segmentation models are trained to follow the cardiac anatomical properties via a learned representation of the 3D shape.”
MethodTarget-Embedding Autoencoders for Supervised Representation LearningPreprint
Jarrett, D. P., & van der Schaar, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.08345 · Cited by 4
You, H., Tian, S., Yu, L., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.11213 · Cited by 4
“…in a variety of scenarios, including image classification [1][2][3], target detection [4][5], image inpainting [44], image semantic segmentation [6][7][9][10], scene behavior prediction [11][12], video target tracking [13] [14], etc. Medical images have the characteristics of complex and diverse…”
BackgroundContour Transformer Network for One-shot Segmentation of Anatomical StructuresPreprint
Lu, Y., Zheng, K., Li, W., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.01480 · Cited by 4
“[41] employs a shape regularization autoencoder in a segmentation network to”
MethodRecognizing Mitral Regurgitation Through Machine Learning Algorithms in Cardiac ImagingPreprint
Singh, V., Anwar, S., & Vavekanand, R. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4586175/v1 · Cited by 6
Guo, Q., Zhou, X., Tan, W., Shen, Y., Liu, S., Zhang, B., & Zhang, Q. (2025) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2025.107952 · Cited by 3
Savage, C. H., Sulam, J., Huang, C., & Yi, P. H. (2026) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.26.34829 · Cited by 4
1S-1R array: Pure-memristor circuit for binary neural networks
Zhang, Z., Ge, Z., Wei, Y., Cheng, X., Xie, G., & Liu, G. (2021) · Microelectronic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mee.2021.111697 · Cited by 2
Chen, T., Othman, M. M., Wang, X., et al. (2022) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109973 · Cited by 3
Semi-supervised peripapillary atrophy segmentation with shape constraint
Li, M., Zhang, W., Yang, R., et al. (2023) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107464 · Cited by 3
Pandey, G., & Ghanekar, U. (2025) · Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis · doi:10.1134/s1054661824701438 · Cited by 3
Frontal Cortex Segmentation of Brain PET Imaging Using Deep Neural Networks
Zhan, Q., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., & Hu, W. (2021) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.796172 · Cited by 3
“• ACNN (Oktay et al., 2017): It utilizes the auto-encoder and T-L network to combine anatomical prior knowledge into CNNs.”
MethodInfluentialXiao, Y., Zhao, Y., & Yang, G. (2022) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi52829.2022.9761519 · Cited by 3
“Recent studies [12-14] have developed semi-supervised segmentation models by incorporating prior knowledge on properties such as shape, location, and context.”
BackgroundRani, G. E., Murugeswari, R., Vairamuthu, S., et al. (2022) · Composites Part C Open Access · doi:10.1016/j.jcomc.2022.100343 · Cited by 3
“These sectors of application include, but are not limited to, medical science, space science, biological materials, industrial applications and remote sensing [4, 5].”
Lin, T., Lin, J., Huang, G., et al. (2023) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ace1cf · Cited by 3
A state of art review on image analysis techniques, datasets and applications
Vetrithangam, D., Pegada, N. K., Himabindu, R., & Kumar, A. R. (2024) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0198675 · Cited by 3
Projected pooling loss for red nucleus segmentation with soft topology constraints
Fu, G., Jurdi, R. E., Chougar, L., Dormont, D., Valabrègue, R., Lehéricy, S., & Olivier Colliot, A. (2024) · Journal of medical imaging · doi:10.1117/1.jmi.11.4.044002 · Cited by 4
FUNAvg: Federated Uncertainty Weighted Averaging for Datasets with Diverse Labels
Tölle, M., Navarro, F., Eble, S., Ivo Wolf, A., Menze, B. H., & Engelhardt, S. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72117-5_38 · Cited by 3
Lin, M., Zhang, L., Wang, Z., Liu, H., Wang, K., Tang, G., Wang, W., & Sun, P. (2024) · Intelligent Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.imed.2024.10.001 · Cited by 6
NRD ‐Net: Non‐local Residual Dense Network for Brain MR Image Super‐Resolution
Chen, J., Guang, M., Chen, G., Yao, X., Tassew, T. M., Li, Z., Li, Z., & Zhang, H. (2025) · International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology · doi:10.1002/ima.70022 · Cited by 3
Cherry and Berry plant leaf disease classification using Modified AlexNet
Fiza, S., Vasu, G. T., Vaishali, R., et al. (2024) · doi:10.1109/icrisst59181.2024.10922022 · Cited by 3
“DL technology is transparent to the user, allowing for automatic extraction of image features [13] and classification of plant disease spots.”
A semi-supervised multi-task assisted method for ultrasound medical image segmentation
Li, H., Yang, J., Qu, M., & Feng, Y. (2025) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2025.130217 · Cited by 3
Teeth Segmentation Using Gamma Adjustment and Transition Region Filter Based on Wavelet Method
Arifin, A. Z., Syuhada, F., Ni’mah, A. T., et al. (2019) · International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC) · doi:10.1109/icic47613.2019.8985725 · Cited by 3
“images into meaningful parts that are used for further analysis [6].”
BackgroundHazra, A. (2021) · International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval · doi:10.1007/s13735-021-00205-6 · Cited by 3
OGIF : A novel Optimized Guided Image Filter for image enhancement
Bhateja, V., Yadav, A. K., & Singh, D. (2023) · Expert Systems · doi:10.1111/exsy.13281 · Cited by 3
Bouteldja, N., Merhof, D., Ehrhardt, J., et al. (2019) · Informatik aktuell · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-25326-4_8 · Cited by 3
Self-citationFactorised Representation Learning in Cardiac Image Analysis.
Chartsias, A., Joyce, T. A., Papanastasiou, G., Williams, M. C., Newby, D. E., Dharmakumar, R., & Tsaftaris, S. A. (2019) · Cited by 3
Diffeomorphic Upsampling of Serially Acquired Sparse 2D Cross-Sections in Cardiac MRI
Lee, B. C., Tward, D. J., Wei, J., Tipre, D. N., Weiss, R. G., Miller, M. I., & Ardekani, S. (2019) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc.2019.8856317 · Cited by 3
“More recently, constrained neural network approaches have been used to incorporate prior anatomical knowledge to enhance sparsely collected 2D cardiac MR imagery [16].”
MethodFrom Artificial Intelligence to Deep Learning in Bio-medical Applications
Montoya, O. L. Q., & Paniagua, J. G. (2020) · Intelligent systems reference library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-42750-4_10 · Cited by 3
Deep Learning Methods for Image Guidance in Radiation Therapy
Paysan, P., Peterlík, I., Roggen, T., Zhu, L., Wessels, C., Schreier, J., Buchacek, M., & Scheib, S. G. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58309-5_1 · Cited by 3
Deep Residual-ASPP Generative Adversarial Network for CS-MRI Reconstruction
Zhu, J., Tao, J., Wang, K., et al. (2020) · International Conference on Computing and Pattern Recognition (ICCPR) · doi:10.1145/3436369.3436489 · Cited by 3
“Especially in the field of images, it has been gradually applied in many application scenarios such as image classification [4], retrieval [5], positioning, segmentation [6], denoising [7], super-resolution [8], face recognition [9], bone recognition [10], etc.”
BackgroundGaussian process with physical laws for 3D cardiac modeling
Nakano, M., Shibue, R., Kashino, K., et al. (2020) · European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) · doi:10.23919/eusipco47968.2020.9287871 · Cited by 3
Hirsch, L., Huang, Y., & Parra, L. C. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 3
Heart Segmentation From MRI Scans Using Convolutional Neural NetworkPreprint
Ibrahim, S. M., Ibrahim, M. S., Usman, M., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.09332 · Cited by 3
“To train a neural network, variety of algorithms have been proposed [17], [18], [19].”
MethodMIASSR: An Approach for Medical Image Arbitrary Scale Super-ResolutionPreprint
Zhu, J., Tan, C. Q., Yang, J., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.10738 · Cited by 3
“39 However, most of the current methods have poor clinical applicability due to two limitations.”
BackgroundDeep Convolutional Neural Networks for Bias Field Correction of Brain Magnetic Resonance ImagesPreprint
Xu, Y. L., Hu, S., & Du, Y. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-853699/v1 · Cited by 3
Deep learning for robust segmentation and explainable analysis of 3d and dynamic cardiac images
Zheng, Q. (2019) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/f8e2c0ebzb753z404ez8af4z518fe6ed6cce · Cited by 3
Hybrid Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Landmark-Based Anatomical Segmentation
Gaggion, N., Mansilla, L., Milone, D. H., et al. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87193-2_57 · Cited by 2
“More recently, with the advent of deep fully convolutional networks [28,27], great efforts were made to incorporate anatomical constraints into such models [17,20,24].”
BackgroundSelf-citationDeep Learning-Based Estimation of Myocardial Material Parameters from Cardiac MRI
Chen, Y., Zhang, X., Huo, Y., & Wang, S. (2025) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering12040433 · Cited by 2
“In recent years, advances in medical imaging techniques [5], particularly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [6,7], have enabled the accurate extraction of cardiac geometries, thereby providing essential geometric data for patient-specific inverse finite element (FE) estimation of myocardial material…”
Enhancing 3D multi-organ segmentation via uncertainty guidance and boundary knowledge distillation
Yu, X., Ding, L., Wu, T., et al. (2025) · Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation · doi:10.1016/j.jvcir.2025.104574 · Cited by 2
ScarElastic: continuous elasticity field modeling for myocardial scar delineation in LGE-CMR
Zou, R., Li, Y., Zhou, N., Guan, X., Li, G., Xie, D., Bo, J., Li, S., Wu, M., Deng, J., et al. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-02163-3 · Cited by 2
Krasniqi, E., & Shehu, V. (2026) · Journal of Future Artificial Intelligence and Technologies · doi:10.62411/faith.3048-3719-330 · Cited by 2
A review of ultrasound video segmentation: From temporal modeling to clinical utility
Huang, Q., An, Z., & Li, G. (2026) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2026.134407 · Cited by 2
Technologies based on energy savings for OLED devices
Albaba, M., & Akkuş, M. S. (2021) · MANAS Journal of Engineering · doi:10.51354/mjen.872956 · Cited by 2
A maximum-entropy-attention-based convolutional neural network for image perception
Chen, Q., Zhang, A., & Pan, G. (2022) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-022-07564-z · Cited by 2
A Survey on Automatic Delineation of Radiotherapy Target Volume based on Machine Learning
Tao, Z., & Lyu, S. (2023) · Data Intelligence · doi:10.1162/dint_a_00204 · Cited by 4
Deep Conditional Shape Models for 3D Cardiac Image Segmentation
Jacob, A. J., Sharma, P. K., & Rückert, D. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-52448-6_5 · Cited by 2
Wang, K., Hachiya, H., & Wu, H. (2024) · International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology · doi:10.1002/ima.23141 · Cited by 2
Volumetric medical image segmentation via scribble annotations and shape priors
Chen, Q., Lyu, H., Hu, X., et al. (2024) · Machine Vision and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00138-024-01643-y · Cited by 2
“Others [37] demonstrate that a data-driven shape prior can be learned through a convolutional autoencoder from unpaired segmentation masks and used as a regulariser to train a segmentation network.”
Li, M., Tian, F., Liang, S., Wang, Q., Shu, X., Guo, Y., & Wang, Y. (2025) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-025-03330-0 · Cited by 2
“The competitors include both representative static image segmentation methods such as anatomical prior knowledge (ACNN) [33], stacked hourglasses (SHG) method [34], U-Net + + [35], and DSANet [11] and the latest sequence segmentation methods such as SOCOF [28], and CLAS [27].”
Galicia, E., Torres-Robles, F., Pérez-González, J., et al. (2025) · Journal of Imaging · doi:10.3390/jimaging11050165 · Cited by 2
“Oktay et al. [26] developed the Anatomically Constrained Neural Network (ACNN), which combines a CNN with an autoencoder trained on ground truth ventricle masks.”
Zhang, J., Lapierre-Landry, M., Kalpatthi, H., Jenkins, M. W., Wilson, D. L., Pelot, N. A., & Shoffstall, A. J. (2026) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ae33f6 · Cited by 5
“…either through loss functions, network architectures, or postprocessing—has proven effective for structures with relatively predictable global topologies, such as tubular blood vessels (Shit et al 2021), cardiac chambers (Oktay et al 2018), and brain subcortical areas (Lorio et al 2016).”
Segmentation Based on Propagation of Dynamically Changing Superpixels
Данилов, В., Gerget, O. M., Skirnevskiy, I. P., Manakov, R. A., & Kolpashchikov, D. Y. (2020) · Programming and Computer Software · doi:10.1134/s0361768820030044 · Cited by 2
Yassine, I. A., Ghanem, A., Metwalli, N. S., et al. (2021) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105041 · Cited by 2
Efficient Image Segmentation of Cardiac Conditions after Basketball Using a Deep Neural Network
Ma, J., & Li, W. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12020466 · Cited by 3
Regularized Landmark Detection with CAEs for Human Pose Estimation in the Operating Room
Hansen, L., Diesel, J., & Heinrich, M. P. (2019) · Informatik aktuell · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-25326-4_38 · Cited by 2
Self-citationAdvances in MRI Applications to Diagnose and Manage Cardiomyopathies
Vajapey, R. S., Eck, B., Tang, W. H. W., & Kwon, D. H. (2019) · Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11936-019-0762-z · Cited by 2
Fully Automated Machine Learning Pipeline for Echocardiogram Segmentation
Thi, T. H. D., Minh, T. N., Van, P. N., & Tran, Q. L. (2021) · International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/kse53942.2021.9648607 · Cited by 3
3D spatial priors for semi-supervised organ segmentation with deep convolutional neural networks
Petit, O., Thome, N., & Soler, L. (2021) · International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11548-021-02494-y · Cited by 2
“Other methods try to incorporate spatial prior information by biasing the learning of internal deep representations in an implicit manner [20,4,13].”
MethodWan, C., Fang, L., Cao, S., Luo, J., Jiang, Y., Wei, Y., Lv, C., & Si, W. (2022) · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.3233/jifs-213212 · Cited by 2
“Litjens et al. [15] applied deep convolution neural network to medical image analyses, which played an important role in breast cancer [16, 17], tumor screening [18, 19], lung nodule classification [20, 21], diagnosis of congenital heart disease [22, 23], and brain image classification [24–26].”
Heart Outer Surface Segmentation from Computed Tomography Images
Zair, A. M., Cherfa, A. B., Cherfa, Y., et al. (2022) · International Conference on Image and Signal Processing and their Applications (ISPA) · doi:10.1109/ispa54004.2022.9786309 · Cited by 2
“The ACNN method is presented in [18], he incorporated global shape than label information using low-resolution images.”
MethodTejero-de-Pablos, A., Yamane, H., Kurose, Y., et al. (2021) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi48211.2021.9434171 · Cited by 2
“In [8], shape priors of the segmented organ are learned in order to restrict the shape of the segmentations (e.g., “a heart is oval-shaped”).”
BackgroundQuantifying Topology In Pancreatic Tubular Networks From Live Imaging 3D Microscopy
Arnavaz, K., Krause, O., Zepf, K., Bærentzen, J. A., Krivokapic, J. M., Heilmann, S., Nyeng, P., & Feragen, A. (2022) · The Journal of Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging · doi:10.59275/j.melba.2022-4bf2 · Cited by 2
“This includes the anatomically constrained network of Oktay et al. (2018), which utilizes an autoencoder to learn a global loss-function that enforces the network to produce anatomically realistic segmentations.”
BackgroundBoosting Ultrasonic Image Classification via Self-Supervised Representation Learning
Hou, Y., & Sang, Q. (2023) · International Conference on Computer, Control and Robotics (ICCCR) · doi:10.1109/icccr56747.2023.10194197 · Cited by 2
“…and image resolution into optimization problems, achieves better accuracy and efficiency by balancing the three dimensions, and is now available in the medical imaging areas of breast cancer, tumor screening[9], pulmonary nodule classification[10], and diagnosis of congenital heart disease[11].”
BackgroundGaikwad, A. V., Varma, H., & Awate, S. P. (2023) · Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip49359.2023.10222358 · Cited by 2
“Some methods model boundary information [2] or shape priors [3, 4] during learning, but the segmented objects can still have topological errors.”
MethodA novel relative homogeneity thresholding method with optimization strategy
Zhang, H., Chiu, Y.-J., & Fan, J. (2019) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-019-04333-3 · Cited by 2
3D Left Ventricular Segmentation from 2D Cardiac MR Images Using Spatial Context
Tilborghs, S., Dresselaers, T., Claus, P., et al. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39074-7_10 · Cited by 2
Kordon, F., Maier, A., Swartman, B. J., et al. (2020) · Informatik aktuell · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-29267-6_36 · Cited by 2
Neural Network based Whole Heart Segmentation from 3D CT images
Habijan, M., Leventić, H., Galić, I., et al. (2020) · International journal of electrical and computer engineering systems · doi:10.32985/ijeces.11.1.3 · Cited by 2
“To overcome this problem of huge anatomical variability and distinctive boundaries in cardiac images, approaches incorporating prior knowledge and artificial neural networks are obtaining the highest accuracy scores for segmentation purposes [23].”
BackgroundRozière, B., Rakotonirina, N. C., Hosu, V., et al. (2020) · Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion (GECCO Companion) · doi:10.1145/3377929.3389959 · Cited by 2
Ahmed, T., & Hasan, M. K. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.04845 · Cited by 5
“Also, profound imaging quality and accuracy have been achieved in MRI image reconstruction [28], classification and segmentation problem [27], and image denoising [29] with the incorporation of DNN.”
BackgroundMethodAn Alarm System For Segmentation Algorithm Based On Shape ModelPreprint
Liu, F., Xia, Y., Yang, D., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.10645 · Cited by 2
Savioli, N., de Marvao, A., Bai, W., Wang, S., Cook, S. A., Chin, C., Rueckert, D., & O’Regan, D. P. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.07975 · Cited by 2
“Making use of multiple images acquired from di ff erent slice directions can further improve and constrain the HR image reconstruction (Oktay et al., 2017; Davatzikos et al., 2003).”
Self-citationInvestigating Presence of Ethnoracial Bias in Clinical Data using Machine LearningPreprint
Velichkovska, B., Gjoreski, H., Denkovski, D., Kalendar, M., Celi, L. A., & Osmani, V. (2021) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.09.01.21262949 · Cited by 2
“In this regard, ML applied to healthcare has already shown significant results [1] [2], which may develop beyond recommendations of clinical actions, towards full-scale assistance such as autonomous triage and patient stratification.”
MethodFramework Construction of an Adversarial Federated Transfer Learning Classifier
Hang Yi, T. B. (2023) · The Frontiers of Society Science and Technology · doi:10.25236/fsst.2023.050312 · Cited by 1
Rawat, U., Batra, V., Sharma, R. K., Kulandhaivel, M., Mukuntharaj, C., & Dongre, D. (2023) · International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I) · doi:10.1109/ic3i59117.2023.10397682 · Cited by 1
“Similar methods have been presented [31] to combine CMR localization with amazingly by applying physiological restrictions using auto-encoders.”
MethodPendhari, S., Kewalya, R., Rizvi, F. R., et al. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Interdisciplinary Approaches in Technology and Management for Social Innovation (IATMSI) · doi:10.1109/iatmsi64286.2025.10985676 · Cited by 1
“The work of Oktay et al.[16] introduced attention gates in medical image segmentation, demonstrating improved accuracy in capturing fine details.”
Mondal, S., S, L. K. B., Harsha, K., et al. (2025) · doi:10.1109/icdsis65355.2025.11071055 · Cited by 1
“Advanced approaches, such as anatomically constrained neural networks (ACNNs), attempt to incorporate prior knowledge into GAN architectures, ensuring that synthetic outputs adhere to medical standards [11].”
Prior-guided local geometric modeling vessel segmentation network for OCT images
Hao, H., Guo, X., Liu, Y., et al. (2025) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2025.108307 · Cited by 1
Kavipriya, J., & Vadivu, G. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3595836 · Cited by 1
“Authors [22] developed Anatom-ically Constrained Neural Networks (ACNNs) for the task of inpainting missing pixels in Medical Resonance (MR) and Ultrasound (US) image data.”
A robust and data-efficient deep learning model for cardiac assessment without segmentation
Artman, C. M., & Henao, R. (2025) · BMC Medical Imaging · doi:10.1186/s12880-025-01903-x · Cited by 2
“After U-Net-style architectures propelled progress in left-ventricular segmentation and eclipsed previous performances for 2D and 3D TTEs, CNNs have dominated segmentation tasks when ground-truth labels, such as tracings, are available [10, 26–28].”
Huang, S., Luo, Y., Chen, Z., et al. (2025) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ae1881 · Cited by 1
“BenTaieb and Hamarneh (2016) utilized geometric and topological priors for gland segmentation, and Oktay et al (2017) developed a shape-prior-based loss for cardiac segmentation.”
Molcăluţ, M., Buzea, C. G., Mirila, D. C., et al. (2025) · Fractal and Fractional · doi:10.3390/fractalfract10010008 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Oktay, O., Ferrante, E., Kamnitsas, K., Heinrich, M., Bai, W., Caballero, J., Cook, S. A., de Marvao, A., Dawes, T., O'Regan, D. P., Kainz, B., Glocker, B., & Rueckert, D.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 384-395
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-254X
- OpenAlex
- W2620296437
- Semantic Scholar
- 33f7b95903eeefdde37fabf9655b4de089d53bd2
- Cited by
- 751
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 135 · 2020: 118 · 2019: 119 · 2018: 47
- FWCI
- 32.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- EPSRC Program (EP/P001009/1)
- British Heart Foundation, U.K. (PG/12/27/29489)
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre-based at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- anatomical prior knowledge, cardiac image segmentation, biomarkers, artifact reduction
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Heart, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cardiomyopathies, Databases, Factual, Neural Networks, Computer, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Cardiac Imaging Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review