The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 34 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Anatomically Constrained Neural Networks (ACNNs): Application to Cardiac Image Enhancement and Segmentation
Open accessAbstract
Incorporation of prior knowledge about organ shape and location is key to improve performance of image analysis approaches. In particular, priors can be useful in cases where images are corrupted and contain artefacts due to limitations in image acquisition. The highly constrained nature of anatomical objects can be well captured with learning-based techniques. However, in most recent and promising techniques such as CNN-based segmentation it is not obvious how to incorporate such prior knowledge. State-of-the-art methods operate as pixel-wise classifiers where the training objectives do not incorporate the structure and inter-dependencies of the output. To overcome this limitation, we propose a generic training strategy that incorporates anatomical prior knowledge into CNNs through a new regularisation model, which is trained end-to-end. The new framework encourages models to follow the global anatomical properties of the underlying anatomy (e.g. shape, label structure) via learnt non-linear representations of the shape. We show that the proposed approach can be easily adapted to different analysis tasks (e.g. image enhancement, segmentation) and improve the prediction accuracy of the state-of-the-art models. The applicability of our approach is shown on multi-modal cardiac data sets and public benchmarks. In addition, we demonstrate how the learnt deep models of 3-D shapes can be interpreted and used as biomarkers for classification of cardiac pathologies.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper proposes anatomically constrained neural networks (ACNN), a generic end-to-end training strategy that uses a stacked convolutional autoencoder and T-L network to impose learnt anatomical shape priors on CNN predictions. It demonstrates improved cardiac MR segmentation, 3D ultrasound segmentation, MR super-resolution, and pathology classification over state-of-the-art baselines.
Key findings
- For cardiac cine-MR segmentation, ACNN-Seg improved endocardium Dice to .939 ± .017 versus .908 ± .021 for 2D-FCN, and myocardium Dice to .811 ± .027 versus .727 ± .046; mean surface distances were also lower (endocardium 1.37 ± 0.42 mm vs 2.07 ± 0.61 mm; myocardium 1.14 ± 0.22 mm vs 1.58 ± 0.44 mm), with p < 0.001 for Dice and mean distance.
- On the CETUS’14 3D-US benchmark, ACNN-Seg achieved end-diastole Dice .912 ± .023 versus .906 ± .026 for FCN and .894 ± .041 for BEAS, and end-systole Dice .873 ± .051 versus .872 ± .050 for FCN and .856 ± .057 for BEAS; Hausdorff distance at ED was 6.96 ± 1.75 mm versus 11.94 ± 9.46 mm for FCN.
- For cardiac MR super-resolution, ACNN-SR achieved SSIM .796 ± .041 versus .783 ± .046 for SR-CNN, clinician MOS scores of 4.36 ± 0.62 and 4.25 ± .68 versus 3.59 ± 1.05 and 3.85 ± .70, and inference time .06 s versus .29 s.
- For pathology classification, T-L codes gave 83.3% accuracy from ED phase and 91.6% with ED+ES, compared with PCA codes at 76.6% and 86.6%, using 10-fold cross-validation on 60 CMR sequences.
Methods
- ACNN adds a shape-regularisation loss to standard CNN training: segmentation uses cross-entropy plus a low-dimensional shape loss and weight decay, while super-resolution uses smooth ℓ1 reconstruction plus a global shape loss and weight decay. The regulariser is a stacked convolutional autoencoder and T-L network that learns 64-dimensional anatomical shape/label representations; it is used only during training, not inference.
- Data include the UK Digital Heart Project dataset of 1200 cine 2D stack and 3D HR cardiac MR image pairs, split into 900 training, 100 validation, and 200 testing for segmentation, and 1000 training / 200 testing for super-resolution; CETUS’14 with 45 3D+time ultrasound sequences from 15 healthy subjects and 30 patients, evaluated blinded on 30 test sequences; and ACDC MICCAI’17 with 20 cine stacks per class for classification.
- Comparisons include 2D-FCN, 3D-UNet, AE-Seg, 3D-Seg, BEAS, FCN, and SR-CNN; metrics include Dice, mean and Hausdorff surface distances, SSIM, mean opinion score, ejection-fraction correlation/bias, and classification accuracy, with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for top methods.
Limitations
- The paper states that 3D-US training data were limited to 15 image sequences; segmentation results could improve by segmenting ED and ES frames simultaneously or using temporal information such as optical flow; classification accuracy could improve by training the AE and T-L models with a classification objective; and achieving the best possible segmentation accuracy was not the main focus.
- The paper also notes that the T-L regulariser is used only at training time, that latent codes are expected to be correlated because the decoder merges codes across spatial dimensions, and that a variational autoencoder was not used because the K-L term would reduce representation power and generative sampling was not needed.
- Evident from the text: the method is evaluated on cardiac applications only, and the authors state future work will extend ACNN to tasks such as human pose estimation and landmark localisation.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 34 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“(II) An implicit statistical parametrisation of the left ventricular shape via NNs for pathology classification;”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The applicability of our approach is shown on multi-modal cardiac datasets and public benchmarks.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Our evaluation shows: (I) A sub-pixel cardiac MR image segmentation approach that, in contrast to previous CNN approaches [44], [2], is robust against slice misalignment and coverage problems;”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [44] [44] P. V. Tran. A fully convolutional neural network for cardiac segmentation in short-axis MRI. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.00494 , 2016. - source
- Not matchedcites [2] [2] M. Avendi, A. Kheradvar, and H. Jafarkhani. A combined deep-learning and deformable-model approach to fully automatic segmentation of the left ventricle in cardiac MRI. MedIA , 30:108-119, 2016. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We show that the proposed approach can be easily adapted to different analysis tasks ( e.g. image enhancement, segmentation) and improve the prediction accuracy of the state-of-the-art models.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The main contribution of ACNN model over the standard FCN approaches is the improved shape delineation of the LV, as it can be seen in terms of the distance error metrics.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: The CETUS web platform evaluation is a valid blinded benchmark for segmentation accuracy.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Slice by slice analysis [2], [44] significantly under-performs compared to the proposed subpixel and ACNN-Seg segmentation methods.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [2] [2] M. Avendi, A. Kheradvar, and H. Jafarkhani. A combined deep-learning and deformable-model approach to fully automatic segmentation of the left ventricle in cardiac MRI. MedIA , 30:108-119, 2016. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked yetcites [44] [44] P. V. Tran. A fully convolutional neural network for cardiac segmentation in short-axis MRI. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.00494 , 2016. - source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: The HR ground-truth label maps projected from HR image space are an accurate reference for segmentation evaluation.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In particular, the dice score metrics are observed to be lower since 2D analysis can yield poor performance in basal and apical parts of the heart as shown in Fig. 6.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: The HR ground-truth label maps projected from HR image space are an accurate reference for segmentation evaluation.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Instead of applying these two gradient descent updates sequentially in an iterative fashion, we perform a joint update training scheme and experimentally observed better convergence.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The experimental results, given in Table II, show that neural network models outperforms previous state-of-theart approaches in this public benchmark dataset although the training data size was limited to 15 image sequences.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: The CETUS web platform evaluation is a valid blinded benchmark for segmentation accuracy.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As can be seen in the bottom row of Fig. 6, without the learnt shape priors, label map predictions are more prone to imaging artefacts.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 34
- The quote only partly states this claim. 5
- Probably not a substantial claim. 16
In the paper
“We show that the proposed segmentation and SR models become more robust against imaging artefacts mentioned earlier which is underlined by our state-of-the-art results on the MICCAI'14 CETUS public benchmark [8].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] [8] O. Bernard, J. G. Bosch, B. Heyde, M. Alessandrini, D. Barbosa, S. Camarasu-Pop, F. Cervenansky, S. Valette, O. Mirea, M. Bernier, et al. Standardized evaluation system for left ventricular segmentation algorithms in 3D echocardiography. IEEE TMI , 35(4):967-977, 2016. - source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“(III) An image SR technique that extends previous work [34] and that is robust against slice misalignments;”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [34] [34] O. Oktay, W. Bai, M. Lee, R. Guerrero, K. Kamnitsas, J. Caballero, A. de Marvao, S. Cook, D. ORegan, and D. Rueckert. Multi-input cardiac image super-resolution using convolutional neural networks. In International Conference on MICCAI , pages 246-254. Springer, 2016. - source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“our approach is computationally more efficient than the state-of-the-art SR-CNN model [34] as the feature extraction is performed in the low-dimensional image space.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [34] [34] O. Oktay, W. Bai, M. Lee, R. Guerrero, K. Kamnitsas, J. Caballero, A. de Marvao, S. Cook, D. ORegan, and D. Rueckert. Multi-input cardiac image super-resolution using convolutional neural networks. In International Conference on MICCAI , pages 246-254. Springer, 2016. - source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“ACNN-Seg | 1.37 ± 0.42 | 7.89 ± 3.83 | .939 ± .017 | 1.14 ± 0.22 | 7.31 ± 3.59 | .811 ± .027 | 1 . 60 × 10 6 |”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Rests on an assumption: The high-resolution motion-free cardiac MR images provide an appropriate reference for evaluating segmentation performance on low-resolution 2D stacks.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is observed that the learnt latent representations in general follow a normal distribution and they are not separated in multi-clusters ( e.g. mixture of Gaussians).”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In particular, Hausdorff distances were reduced significantly”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
- Rests on an assumption: The CETUS web platform evaluation is a valid blinded benchmark for segmentation accuracy.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Previous slice by slice segmentation approaches validated their methods on LR annotations; however, we see that the produced label maps are far off from the true underlying ventricular geometry and it can be a limiting factor for the analysis of ventricle morphology.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The HR ground-truth label maps projected from HR image space are an accurate reference for segmentation evaluation.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similarly, we observed an improvement in terms of normalised Dice score, which was quantitatively not significant due to large volumetric size of the LV cavity.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Rests on an assumption: The CETUS web platform evaluation is a valid blinded benchmark for segmentation accuracy.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is observed that the ACNN approach ensures better consistency between frames although none of the methods have used temporal information.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Rests on an assumption: The CETUS web platform evaluation is a valid blinded benchmark for segmentation accuracy.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We also analysed the performance change in AE-Seg with respect to the number of parameters, which shows that the small capacity AE-Seg model ( 8 × 10 4 pars) is not suitable for cardiac image segmentation as the second stage in the cascaded model does not improve the performance significantly.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The HR ground-truth label maps projected from HR image space are an accurate reference for segmentation evaluation.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We observed that reconstruction of label-maps from low dimensional representations was limited since the ventricle boundaries were not delineated properly but rather a rough segmentation was generated (DSC: . 734 ).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The HR ground-truth label maps projected from HR image space are an accurate reference for segmentation evaluation.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the segmentation problem, the Sorensen-Dice loss was tested in the experiments as an alternative to the cross-entropy loss, yet we observed a degraded performance since the latter is a smoother function.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By including the codes from ES phase, the classification accuracies were improved to 86 . 6% vs 91 . 6% .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Rests on an assumption: The HR ground-truth label maps projected from HR image space are an accurate reference for segmentation evaluation.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We used 10 -fold cross-validation on 60 CMR sequences and obtained 76 . 6% vs 83 . 3% accuracy using PCA and T-L codes extracted from ED phase.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The HR ground-truth label maps projected from HR image space are an accurate reference for segmentation evaluation.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“It is also observed to be more memory efficient compared to the standard 3D-UNet architecture [12].”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [11] [11] H. Chen, Y. Zheng, J.-H. Park, P.-A. Heng, and S. K. Zhou. Iterative multi-domain regularized deep learning for anatomical structure detection and segmentation from ultrasound images. In International Conference on MICCAI , pages 487-495. Springer, 2016. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [12] [12] ¨ O. C ¸ ic ¸ek, A. Abdulkadir, S. S. Lienkamp, T. Brox, and O. Ronneberger. 3D U-Net: Learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation. In Proceedings of MICCAI , pages 424-432. Springer, 2016. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The proposed global training objective in SR corresponds to a prior on the space of feasible high-resolution (HR) solutions, which is experimentally shown to be useful since SR is an illposed problem.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In particular, priors can be useful in cases where images are corrupted and contain artefacts due to limitations in image acquisition.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In that regard, the proposed method is not only useful for image enhancement and segmentation but also for the study of anatomical shape variations in population studies and their associations with cardiac related pathologies.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Our framework learns a non-linear compact representation of the underlying anatomy through a stacked convolutional autoencoder [31] and enforces network predictions to follow the learnt statistical shape/label distributions.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] [31] J. Masci, U. Meier, D. Cires ¸an, and J. Schmidhuber. Stacked convolutional auto-encoders for hierarchical feature extraction. In International - Conference on Artificial Neural Networks , pages 52-59. Springer, 2011. -
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More importantly, our approach is independent of the particular NN architecture or application; it can be combined with any of the state-of-the-art segmentation or super-resolution (SR) NN models and potentially improve its prediction accuracy and robustness without introducing any memory or computational complexity at inference time.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“We also demonstrate that the lower dimensional representations learnt by the proposed ACNN can be useful for classification of pathologies such as dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and it does not require point-wise correspondence search between subjects as in [39].”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [39] [39] M. Shakeri, H. Lombaert, S. Tripathi, S. Kadoury, A. D. N. Initiative, et al. Deep spectral-based shape features for Alzheimers disease classification. In SASHIMI , pages 15-24. Springer, 2016. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Similarly, 3D-US is recommended over the use of 2D-US since it has been demonstrated to provide more accurate and reproducible volumetric measurements [25].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [25] [25] R. M. Lang, L. P. Badano, W. Tsang, D. H. Adams, E. Agricola, T. Buck, F. F. Faletra, A. Franke, J. Hung, L. P. de Isla, et al. EAE/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using three-dimensional echocardiography. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography , 25(1):3-46, 2012. -
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More importantly, our approach is independent of the particular NN architecture or application; it can be combined with any of the state-of-the-art segmentation or super-resolution (SR) NN models and potentially improve its prediction accuracy and robustness without introducing any memory or computational complexity at inference time.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Using the proposed approach we can perform full 3D segmentation without explicit motion correction and do not have to rely on LR slice-by-slice 2D segmentation.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In [1], Alain and Bengio showed that the denoising reconstruction error is equivalent to contractive penalty, which forces the feature extraction (encoder) function f resist perturbations of the input and contracts these input samples to similar low dimensional codes.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] [1] G. Alain and Y. Bengio. What regularized auto-encoders learn from the data-generating distribution. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 15(1):3563-3593, 2014. -
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As for the case of image segmentation, learnt shape representations can be used to regularise image SR, constraining the model to make only anatomically meaningful predictions.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“It provides two main advantages over the state-of-the-art medical image SR model proposed in [34]: (I) the network generates image features in the LR image grid rather than early upsampling of the features, which reduces memory and computation requirements significantly.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [34] [34] O. Oktay, W. Bai, M. Lee, R. Guerrero, K. Kamnitsas, J. Caballero, A. de Marvao, S. Cook, D. ORegan, and D. Rueckert. Multi-input cardiac image super-resolution using convolutional neural networks. In International Conference on MICCAI , pages 246-254. Springer, 2016. - source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The given penalty function promotes the network to learn the underlying low-dimensional data manifold and capture its local smooth structure.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The experimental results were evaluated in a blinded fashion by uploading the generated segmentations from separate 30 sequences into the CETUS web platform.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Low dimensional encoding enables us to train models with global characteristics but also yields better generalisation power for the underlying anatomy as shown in earlier work [43].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [43] [43] A. Torralba and Y. Weiss. Small codes and large image databases for recognition. In Proceedings of CVPR , pages 1-8. IEEE, 2008. - source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition to the smoothness of the latent distributions, the extracted codes are expected to be correlated since the decoder merges some of the codes along the three spatial dimensions to construct input feature maps for the transposed convolutions, but this characteristic is not a limitation in our study.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Image SR is an ill-posed problem as there are an infinite number of solutions for a given input sample but only a few would be anatomically meaningful and accurate.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition to imposing shape regularisation, this parametrisation encourages label consistency in model predictions, and reduces false-positive detections as they can influence the predicted codes in the hidden layer.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“global regularisation reduces the amount of spurious false positive predictions and enforces abnormal LV segmentation shapes to fit into the learnt representation model.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is important to note that the T-L regulariser model is used only at training time but not during inference; in other words, the fully convolutional (FCN) segmentation and super-resolution models can still be used for applications using different image sizes.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, we believe that adversarial training comes at the expense of less interpretability of the regularisation term and unstable model training behaviour, which still remains an open research problem.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In SR application, AL enables the SR network to hallucinate fine texture detail, and the synthesized HR images appear qualitatively more realistic. However, at the same time the PSNR and SSIM scores are usually worse.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] [26] C. Ledig, L. Theis, F. Husz´ ar, J. Caballero, A. Cunningham, A. Acosta, A. Aitken, A. Tejani, J. Totz, Z. Wang, et al. Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.04802 , 2016. -
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The proposed regulariser model can be seen as an application-specific training objective.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The 3DSeg approach uses the convolution kernels more efficiently without requiring the model to output a high-dimensional intensity image.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The clinical HR images used as reference for SR evaluation are accurate ground truth.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The presented ACNN framework is not only limited to the medical image segmentation and SR tasks but can be extended to other image analysis tasks where prior knowledge can provide model guidance and robustness.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Such approaches have been used successfully in natural image super-resolution (SR) [26] and segmentation [30] tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] [26] C. Ledig, L. Theis, F. Husz´ ar, J. Caballero, A. Cunningham, A. Acosta, A. Aitken, A. Tejani, J. Totz, Z. Wang, et al. Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.04802 , 2016. - source
- Not checked yetcites [30] [30] P. Luc, C. Couprie, S. Chintala, and J. Verbeek. Semantic segmentation using adversarial networks. In NIPS Workshop on Adversarial Training , 2016. - source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“For this reason, the authors of [26] have pointed out that adversarial training may not be suitable for medical applications, where the accuracy and fidelity of the visual content more important than the qualitative appearance of the HR images.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] [26] C. Ledig, L. Theis, F. Husz´ ar, J. Caballero, A. Cunningham, A. Acosta, A. Aitken, A. Tejani, J. Totz, Z. Wang, et al. Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.04802 , 2016. -
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the additional K-L divergence term (constraint) would reduce the representation power of the AE; thus, the local anatomical variations would not be captured in detail.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additionally, non-linear layers are not applied on the lower dimensional latent representations since that would further constrain the autoencoder.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More importantly, cascaded approaches add additional computational complexity due to the increased number of filters, which could be redundant given that the standard segmentation model is able to capture shape properties of the organs as long as it has a large receptive field and is optimised with shape constraints.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast to this, our AE model is trained solely on cardiac segmentation masks and features are customised to identify anatomical variations observed in the heart chambers.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The high-resolution motion-free cardiac MR images provide an appropriate reference for evaluating segmentation performance on low-resolution 2D stacks.
“Since the ground-truth information is obtained from the HR motionfree images, the experimental results are expected to reflect the performance of the method with respect to an appropriate reference.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A perfect mapping between intensity and label spaces is practically not achievable.
“Since a perfect mapping between the intensity and label spaces is practically not achievable, the T-L learnt codes are expected to be more representative due to the inclusion of additional information.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Anatomical objects in medical images are naturally more constrained in shape and location than objects in natural images.
“Inclusion of priors in medical imaging could potentially have much more impact compared to their use in natural image analysis since anatomical objects in medical images are naturally more constrained in terms of their shape and location.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The proposed ACNN is one of the earliest studies demonstrating the use of convolutional autoencoder networks to learn anatomical shape variations from medical images.
“More importantly, to the best of our knowledge, this is one of the earliest studies demonstrating the use of convolutional autoencoder networks to learn anatomical shape variations from medical images.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The HR ground-truth label maps projected from HR image space are an accurate reference for segmentation evaluation.
“The corresponding groundtruth label maps, however, are projected from the HR image space, which are annotated in the HR image grid.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The clinical HR images used as reference for SR evaluation are accurate ground truth.
“The quality of the upsampled images is evaluated in terms of SSIM metric [47] between the clinical HR image data and reconstructed HR images.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The two expert cardiologists' MOS ratings reliably quantify image quality.
“Two expert cardiologists were asked to rate the upsampled images from 1 (very poor) to 5 (excellent) based on the accuracy of the reconstructed LV boundary and geometry.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The CETUS web platform evaluation is a valid blinded benchmark for segmentation accuracy.
“The experimental results were evaluated in a blinded fashion by uploading the generated segmentations from separate 30 sequences into the CETUS web platform.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 2D stack LR images are a commonly used acquisition protocol for cardiac imaging.
“only the 2D stack LR images are used, which is a commonly used acquisition protocol for cardiac imaging”
The paper relies on this without support.
The LV blood pool is larger than the myocardium.
“due to the larger size of the LV blood pool compared to the myocardium.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the authors report performance superior to 3D-ACNN Oktay et al. (2017), achieving 4.3% increase in Dice and 4.15mm (40% less) improvement in Hausdorff distance .”
From Embracing imperfect datasets: A review of deep learning solutions for medical image segmentation (2020) · cites this paper as Oktay et al. (2017)
In the citing paper
“The authors attribute the inferior performance by Ravishankar et al. (2017) to over-regularization, which they have overcome by replacing CDAE with a frozen encoder during training.”
From Embracing imperfect datasets: A review of deep learning solutions for medical image segmentation (2020) · cites this paper as Oktay et al. (2017)
In the citing paper
“The suggested model achieves 1.2% and 2.0% improvement respectively in Dice over Ravishankar et al. (2017) for 3D endocardium and myocardium segmentation on a cine-MR dataset (1000 training and 200 testing).”
From Embracing imperfect datasets: A review of deep learning solutions for medical image segmentation (2020) · cites this paper as Oktay et al. (2017)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Cross-entropy and Euclidean gradients have their roles reversed
MinorThe text defines cross-entropy as the segmentation-reconstruction loss and Euclidean distance as the loss matching the predictor's latent codes. It then assigns the predictor-matching role to the first gradient, ∂L x, and the reconstruction role to the second, ∂L h-the reverse of those definitions.
“The first gradient encourages the encoder to generate codes that could be easily extracted by the predictor while the second gradient making sure that a good segmentation-reconstruction can be obtained at the output of the decoder.”
“In the first stage, the AE is trained separately with ground-truth segmentation masks and cross-entropy loss L x . Later, the predictor model is trained to match the learnt latent space h by minimising the Euclidean distance L h between the codes predicted by the AE and predictor as shown in Fig. 3.”
Citations
Cites
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 114,148 · cited 4×
“In that regard, our model differentiates from the VGG-Net [42] feature based training objectives [26], [21].”
MethodInfluentialU-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404 · cited 6×
“In that regard, the proposed SR model and U-Net segmentation models are concatenated to obtain HR segmentation results.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialImage quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892 · cited 1×
“The quality of the upsampled images is evaluated in terms of SSIM metric [47] between the clinical HR image data and reconstructed HR images.”
MethodFully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Long, J., Shelhamer, E., & Darrell, T. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298965 · Cited by 38,834 · cited 1×
“In CNN based segmentation models [22], [29], [38], this task is performed by learning a discriminative function that models the underlying conditional probability distribution P(ys |x).”
MethodA survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
Litjens, G., Kooi, T., Bejnordi, B. E., Setio, A. A. A., Ciompi, F., Ghafoorian, M., van der Laak, J. A. W. M., van Ginneken, B., & Sánchez, C. I. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005 · Cited by 15,332 · cited 2×
“As explained in a recent NN survey paper [28], the majority of the classification and regression models utilise a pixel-”
BackgroundConditional Random Fields: Probabilistic Models for Segmenting and Labeling Sequence Data
Lafferty, J., McCallum, A., & Pereira, F. C. N. (2001) · ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) · Cited by 12,935
Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network
Ledig, C., Theis, L., Huszar, F., Caballero, J., Cunningham, A., Acosta, A., Aitken, A., Tejani, A., Totz, J., Wang, Z., et al. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.19 · Cited by 12,696 · cited 5×
“ture based training objectives [21], [26].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationPhoto-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network
Ledig, C., Theis, L., Huszár, F., Caballero, J., Cunningham, A., Acosta, A., Aitken, A., Tejani, A., Totz, J., Wang, Z.-H., et al. (2016) · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.04802 · Cited by 12,624
Self-citationPerceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolution
Johnson, J., Alahi, A., & Fei-Fei, L. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46475-6_43 · Cited by 11,283 · cited 3×
“Similar modifications of the objective function during training have been introduced to enhance the quality of natural images, such as perceptual [21] and adversarial [26] loss terms, which were used to synthesise more realistic images in terms of texture and object boundaries.”
Method3D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotation
Çiçek, Ö., Abdulkadir, A., Lienkamp, S. S., Brox, T., & Ronneberger, O. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_49 · Cited by 7,945
Flagged first, then by citations
7 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 758
A novel lightweight network for multi-contrast MRI image SR reconstruction
Sun, H., Yang, H., & Li, X. (2025) · doi:10.1109/cyberscitech68397.2025.00009 · Cited by 1
Exploring anatomical similarity in zero-shot learning for bone abnormality detection
Kutbi, M., Shaban, K., & Khogeer, A. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-37516-9 · Cited by 2
“Our focus differs from anatomy informed learning that injects priors during training e.g., constraint losses or organ-aware decoders 22–24 and from medical self-supervised pretraining that improves generic visual features 25 .”
Yang, S., Wang, H., Ikebe, M., et al. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm66473.2025.11356216 · Cited by 1
“In accordance with clinical practice, anatomical prior knowledge plays a critical role in medical decision-making [23].”
Rajarajeswari, R., & Sankaradass, V. (2026) · AIP Advances · doi:10.1063/5.0307693 · Cited by 1
Klug, J., Leclerc, G., Dirren, E., Preti, M. G., Ville, D. V. D., & Carrera, E. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72084-1_16 · Cited by 1
Quantification of Predictive Uncertainty via Inference-Time Sampling
Tóthová, K., Ladický, Ľ., Thul, D., Pollefeys, M., & Ender Konukoglu, A. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16749-2_2 · Cited by 1
“While this may seem limiting, on the contrary this restriction is often exploited in medical image analysis to improve model robustness and generalization, e.g., [38,29,26,19].”
BackgroundA Review on Neural Approaches in Image Processing Applications
Bhalla, V. (2023) · International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2023.49851 · Cited by 1
Mishra, H. M., Ahmed, B., Shuja, M., Qtaishat, A., & Kumar, M. (2023) · International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Networks (ISCON) · doi:10.1109/iscon57294.2023.10111959 · Cited by 1
“To teach convolutional neural networks (CNNs) anatomical prior information, O. Oktay et al. [15] offer a universal training approach that makes use of an end-to-end learned regularisation model.”
BackgroundImproved adaptive image enhancement algorithm based on SSA
Song, W., & Lin, C. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Control, Electronics and Computer Technology (ICCECT) · doi:10.1109/iccect57938.2023.10140587 · Cited by 1
“Therefore, image enhancement technology under low illumination conditions has always been a challenging problem in image algorithms [1].”
BackgroundReinforcement learning for instance segmentation with high-level priors
Hilt, P., Zarvandi, M., Kaziakhmedov, E., Bhide, S., Laptin, M., Pape, C., & Kreshuk, A. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops · doi:10.1109/iccvw60793.2023.00423 · Cited by 1
“Learned non-linear representations of the shape are used in [34], while in [25] the loss for object boundary prediction is made topology-aware.”
BackgroundMethodMedical image super-resolution
Al-Olofi, W. A., & Rushdi, M. A. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95462-4.00013-3 · Cited by 1
Flipped Classroom Strategy in Improving Achievement and Motivation of Madrasah Tsanawiyah Students
Wantu, H. M., Emer, S., Lisnawaty, S. D., Badruzzaman, B., & Dewi, R. K. (2024) · World Psychology · doi:10.55849/wp.v3i1.613 · Cited by 1
E-model for Early Detection of Breast Cancer and Patient Monitoring
Ejiofor, V. E., Ngozi, C. F., Daniel, U., & Amulu, H. U. (2024) · International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) · doi:10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24jun1039 · Cited by 1
Enhancing Hardware Neural Networks with Self-Healing Perceptron Design
Mohaidat, T., Niu, Z., Azeemuddin, S., et al. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Computing and Machine Intelligence (ICMI) · doi:10.1109/icmi60790.2024.10585684 · Cited by 1
“In the modern field of electronic design, Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) have been widely adopted for various tasks in neural networks including signal processing [4, 5], fault prediction [6], image processing [7–9], Alzheimer’s disease [10], and data flow management [11].”
Implicitly Explicit: Segmenting Vertebrae with Deep Implicit Statistical Shape Models
Podobnik, G., Ocepek, D., Škrlj, L., et al. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-75291-9_5 · Cited by 1
Cardiac cavity segmentation review in the past decade: Methods and future perspectives
Li, F., Li, W., Shu, Y., Peng, Y., & Xiao, B. (2025) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2024.129326 · Cited by 1
Singh, G., Darji, A. D., Sarvaiya, J. N., & Patnaik, S. (2025) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-025-04155-2 · Cited by 1
Evaluating Specialized CNN Architectures for Hip Implant Loosening Detection on Radiographic Images
Gogus, E., & Yılmaz, A. (2025) · Cognitive Models and Artificial Intelligence Conference (AICCONF) · doi:10.1109/aicconf64766.2025.11064300 · Cited by 2
“Anatomically Constrained Neural Networks (ACNNs) for application in cardiac image segmentation tasks [14].”
IFOC: Intensity Fitting on Overlapping Cover for Image Segmentation
Shi, X., & Li, C. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33723-0_47 · Cited by 1
Segmentation Algorithm Based on Square Blocks Propagation
Данилов, В., Данилов, В., Петрович, С. И., Skirnevskiy, I. P., Manakov, R. A., Kolpashchikov, D. Y., & Gerget, O. M. (2019) · International Conference on Computer Graphics and Vision (GraphiCon) · doi:10.30987/graphicon-2019-2-148-154 · Cited by 1
RETRACTED: Fast swimming motion image segmentation method based on symmetric difference algorithm
Cao, Y. (2020) · Microprocessors and Microsystems · doi:10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103541 · Cited by 1
RetractedMei, J. (2020) · doi:10.1145/3436286.3436287 · Cited by 1
“And since then, lots of CNN-based networks have been developed and shown great advantage in image processing[13][14].”
BackgroundLatent Shape Constraint for Anatomical Landmark Detection on Spine Radiographs
Kordon, F., Maier, A., & Kunze, H. (2021) · Informatik aktuell · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-33198-6_85 · Cited by 1
Data-driven feature learning for myocardial registration and segmentation
Öksüz, İ., Mukhopadhyay, A., Dharmakumar, R., & Tsaftaris, S. A. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-817428-9.00007-3 · Cited by 1
Augmented Experiment in Material Engineering Using Machine Learning
Osmani, A., Hamidi, M., & Bouhouche, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i10.17116 · Cited by 1
A Review of Face Recognition Using Feature Optimization and Classification Techniques
Raikwar, A., & Agrawal, J. (2020) · Algorithms for intelligent systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-4936-6_64 · Cited by 1
Dual Attention Guided R2 U-Net Architecture for Right Ventricle Segmentation in MRI Images
Jiang, L., Cui, H., Yuwen, C., et al. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87358-5_41 · Cited by 1
A Gaussian Process Model for Unsupervised Analysis of High Dimensional Shape Data
Tao, W., Bhalodia, R., & Whitaker, R. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87589-3_37 · Cited by 1
Shaker, A. S. (2021) · Ibn AL- Haitham Journal For Pure and Applied Science · doi:10.30526/34.4.2710 · Cited by 1
“When copying from the adaptively MRI image, the opened image is used as a mask, as mentioned in [12].”
MethodContext Correlation Aware Network for Cardiac Segmentation
Fan, J., Pei, J., Bi, X., et al. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) · doi:10.1109/icme52920.2022.9859985 · Cited by 1
“Oktay et al. [1] used an approach named anatomically constrained neural network (ACNN).”
MethodPham, D. D., Dovletov, G., Warwas, S., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.09263 · Cited by 1
“[6] propose a similar approach, in which also a pre-trained autoencoder is used to incorporate shape priors into the deep learning architecture.”
MethodAn Automatic Cardiac Segmentation Framework based on Multi-sequence MR ImagePreprint
Liu, Y., Wang, W., Wang, K., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.05488 · Cited by 1
“e (LV). They firstly initialized the LV by a two-step registration method and then adopted principal components to estimate the LV. At last, the myocardium was refined on the poly space. Oktay et al. [4] incorporated global shape information into CNN. They utilized autoencoder to estimate the global shape information…”
MethodMedical Image Segmentation with Limited Supervision: A Review of Deep Network ModelsPreprint
Peng, J., & Wang, Y. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.00429 · Cited by 1
“Rather than using the compact codes produced by an autoencoder as the shape constraint in [94], Yue et al.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA Survey on Semi-parametric Machine Learning Technique for Time Series Forecasting.Preprint
Ahmad, K. M., He, G., Yu, W., Xu, X., Kumar, J., & Saleem, M. A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 1
Role of deep learning techniques in non-invasive diagnosis of human diseases.
Abdeltawab, H. (2022) · ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository (University of Louisville) · doi:10.18297/etd/3938 · Cited by 1
A Multi-Attention and Depthwise Separable Convolution Network for Medical Image SegmentationPreprint
Zhou, Y., Kang, X., Ren, F., et al. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4495223 · Cited by 1
Diet-Seg: Dynamic Hardness-Aware Learning for Enhanced Brain Tumor SegmentationPreprint
Lv, B., Huang, X., Zhou, Q., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.05.31.657149 · Cited by 1
“Typical decoder designs focus heavily on semantic restoration, overlooking spatial gradients that define anatomical boundaries[28].”
Tilborghs, S., Dresselaers, T., Claus, P., et al. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68107-4_13
Partially Mixed Selectivity and Parietal Cortex
Zhang, C. Y. (2018) · CaltechTHESIS (California Institute of Technology) · doi:10.7907/r1rs-rj59
Liu, K., Ma, Y., Xiong, H., Yan, Z., Zhou, Z., Liu, C., Fang, P., Li, X., & Chen, Y. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.06575
“the assistance of high-resolution(HR) medical images, doctors are able to see biological tissues and early lesions more clearly, which is of considerable benecial of diagnosing and treating diseases[1, 2, 3, 4]. However, HR medical images are hard to obtain due to limitations of imaging hardware and noises in the wild…”
BackgroundJia, S., Despinasse, A., Wang, Z., et al. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.02518
Computational Anatomy for Multi-Organ Analysis in Medical Imaging: A ReviewPreprint
Cerrolaza, J. J., Lopez-Picazo, M., Humbert, L., et al. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.08577
Self-citationBiffi, C., Cerrolaza, J. J., Tarroni, G., Bai, W., Oktay, O., Folgoc, L. L., Kamnitsas, K., de Marvao, A., Doumou, G., Duan, J., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 1
Self-citationBayesian Generative Models for Knowledge Transfer in MRI Semantic Segmentation ProblemsPreprint
Kuzina, A., Egorov, E., & Burnaev, E. V. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.12639
3D Deep Affine-Invariant Shape Learning for Brain MR Image SegmentationPreprint
Zhou, H., Bao, S., & Chung, A. C. S. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.06629
“A more recent work Anatomically Constrained Neural Networks (ACNN) [5] used an autoencoder to learn the shape by training that autoencoder to reconstruct a label map itself, and used the Euclidean distance between the bottleneck layers of the autoencoder to quantify the dissimilarity in shape.”
MethodShape Constrained Network for Eye Segmentation in the WildPreprint
Luo, B., Shen, J., Cheng, S., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.05283
“Inspired by ACNN [29], we regularise the shape prediction in the latent space of pre-trained VAE-GAN.”
MethodA Novel Cooperative Divide-and-Conquer Neural Networks Algorithm
Wang, P., Zuo, Y., Wang, J., & Zhang, J. (2019) · Advances in library and information science (ALIS) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-1786-4.ch011
Chen, H., Liu, L., Le, K., Tian, X., & Su, J. (2019) · International Congress on Image and Signal Processing (CISP) · doi:10.1109/cisp-bmei48845.2019.8965975
“Two major techniques currently applied on medical image segmentation: active contour model techniques [3], which is widely used in segmenting lung CT images [4-7]; and machine learning methods [8-12].”
MethodSurface loss for medical image segmentation
Bouchtiba, J. (2019) · Espace ÉTS (ETS)
Leclerc, S., Smistad, E., Østvik, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.02043
“U-Net++ [6], stacked hourglasses network [7] and anatomically constrained neural network [3]) did not produce better results.”
BackgroundResultCrossover-Net: Leveraging the Vertical-Horizontal Crossover Relation for Robust SegmentationPreprint
Yu, Q., Shi, Y., Zheng, Y., Gao, Y., Zhu, J., & Dai, Y. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.01397
“In addition, a linear combination loss was introduced to train the CNN model for cardiac segmentation in [29].”
MethodCNN in CT Image Segmentation: Beyound Loss Function for Expoliting Ground Truth ImagesPreprint
Song, Y., Yu, Z. T., Zhou, T., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.03882
“(1) Regularization-based methods [3, 4, 5] focus on devising the loss function.”
MethodStructure-guided registration in learning based image analysis
Lee, M. C. H. (2019) · Spiral (Imperial College London) · doi:10.25560/79296
Reciprocal Landmark Detection and Tracking with Extremely Few AnnotationsPreprint
Lin, J., Sahebzamani, G., Luong, C. L., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.11224
“Most of the recent methods have used fully convolutional neural networks (FCN) as their main building block to predict pixel-level labels [18, 12, 1, 14, 13, 2, 3, 24].”
MethodAtlas-aware ConvNetfor Accurate yet Robust Anatomical SegmentationPreprint
Yuan, L., Song, W., Yang, J., Qiu, L., Wang, K., & He, L. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.01256
“Distances between predictions and empirical distributions of organ sizes (Zhou et al. (2019); Kervadec et al. (2019)) and latent features (Oktay et al. (2017); Dalca et al. (2018)) have also been exploited for optimization.”
BackgroundAdversarially Learning a Local Anatomical Prior: Vertebrae Labelling with 2D reformationsPreprint
Sekuboyina, A., Rempfler, M., Valentinitsch, A., Kirschke, J., & Menze, B. H. (2019) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.02205 · Cited by 3
“Different from this, in [15], the encoder of a similarly”
BackgroundOne-stage Multi-task Detector for 3D Cardiac MR Imaging
Lu, W., Jia, X., Chen, W., et al. (2021) · Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition/Proceedings/International Conference on Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/icpr48806.2021.9412087
“In order to learn such 3D context, a straightforward idea is to apply 3D convolutional neural networks [2] [3] [4] [5].”
BackgroundSelf-citationQuantifying atherosclerosis in vasculature using ultrasound imaging
Azzopardi, C. (2020) · ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University)
EnMcGAN: Adversarial Ensemble Learning for 3D Complete Renal Structures SegmentationPreprint
He, Y., Ge, R., Qi, X., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.04130
“The shape regularisation utilizes the shape knowledge learned by an additional model to encourage the CNN extracting higher-order shape features [13, 16, 10].”
MethodStateless actor-critic for instance segmentation with high-level priorsPreprint
Hilt, P., Zarvandi, M., Kaziakhmedov, E., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.02600
“Learned non-linear representations of the shape are used in [34], while in [25] the loss for object boundary prediction is made topology-aware.”
BackgroundMethodJoint Motion Correction and Super Resolution for Cardiac Segmentation via Latent OptimisationPreprint
Wang, S., Qin, C., Savioli, N., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.03887
“Besides images, machine learning algorithms have also been proposed for enhancing the segmentations [14,7,9].”
MethodSelf-citationContext-aware virtual adversarial training for anatomically-plausible segmentationPreprint
Wang, P., Peng, J., Pedersoli, M., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.05532
Retracted: Evaluation of RCNN parameters for Senile dementia diagnosis using ADNI dataset
Balne, S., & Elumalai, A. (2021) · International Conference on Recent Trends on Electronics, Information, Communication & Technology (RTEICT) · doi:10.1109/rteict52294.2021.9573969
“Deep learning methods in machine learning make abnormality identification, medical image segmentation [2], and image classification easy.”
MethodRetractedRectal Carcinoma Segmentation Based On Image Pre-processing and Improved U-Net with Residual Block
Runchen, L., Hao, W., He, G., Ahmad, K. M., & Yu, W. (2021) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Intelligent Systems Engineering (MLISE) · doi:10.1109/mlise54096.2021.00034 · Cited by 1
Feature Aggregation and Topology Embedding on Convolution Neural Network for Airway Segmentation
Fu, R., Shen, Z., Pan, L., et al. (2021) · International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC) · doi:10.1109/iccc54389.2021.9674304
“Several researches have shown that this method can facilitate the network performance well [17]–[20].”
MethodPeripapillary Atrophy Segmentation Based on ASM Loss
Li, M., Zhao, H., Xu, J., et al. (2022) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi52829.2022.9761687
“We compare our method with DRIU [10], ACNN [6], Li et al. [4], and ASM post-processing [9].”
Μπιζόπουλος, Π. (2019) · doi:10.12681/eadd/46590
Wavelet Transform Based Volumetric Deep Learning Liver SegmentationPreprint
Maere, C., Liu, Z., & Kabe, G. K. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4117316
2D UNET SEGMENTATION OF MITOCHONDRIA OF ELECTRON MICROSCOPY IMAGES
(2022) · International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science · doi:10.56726/irjmets29962
Automated Left Ventricle Localization from Cardiac MR Images Using Deep Learning
Sulaiman, S. N., Osman, M. K., Isa, I. S., Karim, N. K. A., Abdullah, M. F., & Mohamed, F. (2022) · Journal of Electrical & Electronic Systems Research · doi:10.24191/jeesr.v21i1.004
Left ventricle segmentation and quantification using deep learning
Abdeltawab, H., Khalifa, F., Taher, F., Ghazal, M. A., Mahmoud, A. H., & El-Baz, A. S. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-821983-6.00008-4 · Cited by 1
A Literature Review on Segmentation of Medical Images using U-Net and Other Techniques
Nagaraj, K., Reddy, N., Reddy, R. A., N, N. S. S., & Anitha, M. T. (2023) · INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT · doi:10.55041/ijsrem17612
Multi-modal Latent-Space Self-alignment for Super-Resolution Cardiac MR Segmentation
Deng, Y., Yang, W. T., Qian, L., et al. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-23443-9_3
“Oktay et al. argue that segmentation networks optimised by pixel-level losses ( e.g. , cross-entropy and Dice) lack prior constraints from anatomical structures, and thus are susceptible to image corruption or artefacts [11].”
Super-Resolution Reconstruction of Medical Images Based on Sparse Representation in the NSCT Domain
聂, 小. (2023) · Software Engineering and Applications · doi:10.12677/sea.2023.122028
Measurement and Quantification
Bernard, O., Ruijsink, B., Grenier, T., & Craene, M. D. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-05071-8_4
Impact of attention mechanism on U-Net architecture for the Left Ventricle segmentation
Belfilali, H., Bousefsaf, F., & Messadi, M. (2022) · doi:10.1109/ictih57289.2022.10112110
An improved method for reasonable segmentation based on Post-DAE
Zhou, Y., Dai, Y., & Zhang, J. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Cyborg and Bionic Systems (CBS) · doi:10.1109/cbs55922.2023.10115369
Machine learning and biophysical models: how to benefit each other?
Duchateau, N., & Cámara, Ó. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-32-389967-3.00009-3 · Cited by 1
Abnormality Detection in Heart Using Combination of CNN, RNN and U-Net
Sharma, U., Nigam, N., Kumar, U., et al. (2023) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-0973-5_10
Automatic brain tumor detection using adaptive region growing with thresholding methods
Ezzat, K. A., Omran, L. N., Ismail, A. A., et al. (2023) · IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.11591/ijai.v12.i4.pp1569-1576
Wang, D., Jiang, C., He, J., et al. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4528491
Learning Normal Asymmetry Representations for Homologous Brain Structures
Deangeli, D., Iarussi, E., Princich, J. P., et al. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-43993-3_8
Shamla Beevi, A., Nagarkoti, A., Kalady, S., et al. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3409827/v1
Dual consistency loss for contour-aware segmentation in medical images
Torres, H. R., Oliveira, B., Fonseca, J. C., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · doi:10.1109/embc40787.2023.10340931
Wang, D., Jiang, C., He, J., Teng, Y., Qin, H., Liu, J., & Yang, X. (2023) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ad14c5 · Cited by 1
Deep Vessel Segmentation with Joint Multi-Prior Encoding
Sadikine, A., Badic, B., Ferrante, E., et al. (2024) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi56570.2024.10635835
“I V ] 18 S e p 2024 high-level prior knowledge to ensure anatomically plausible delineations [6, 7, 8].”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationImage Restoration and Enhancement Using Blind Estimation of Amplitude Distortion
Chochia, P. A. (2023) · Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics · doi:10.1134/s1064226923140061
Introduction to intelligent techniques and applications
Jain, P., & Gupta, S. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-15999-2.00012-8
Topology‐preserving segmentation of abdominal muscle layers from ultrasound images
Liao, F., Li, D., Yang, X., Cao, W., Xiang, D., Yuan, G., Wang, Y., & Zheng, J. (2024) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.17377
Contour-constrained branch U-Net for accurate left ventricular segmentation in echocardiography
Qu, M., Yang, J., Li, H., et al. (2024) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-024-03201-0
“[18] introduced a universal training strategy aimed at encouraging models to adhere to the global anatomical characteristics of the underlying anatomy.”
Chen, Y., D’Souza, N. S., Mandepally, A., et al. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73284-3_30
CSDCNet: A Semantic Segmentation Network for Tubular Structures
Dong, F., Jin, J., Li, L., et al. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-0116-5_24
Qin, C., Wang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2024) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2024.107212
Sabbar, H., Silkan, H., & Abbad, K. (2024) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-77040-1_2
Kaftan, P., Heinrich, M. P., Hansen, L., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11548-024-03310-z
Self-citationMyocardial Segmentation of 2D Echocardiography Based on the Improved Self-Attention Mechanism
Li, D., Sun, Y., Han, X., et al. (2024) · doi:10.1109/mvipit65697.2024.00013
Segmentation of Lung Images Using Hybridization of Fuzzy C Means and Morphological Techniques
Harshini, I. S., R, S. D. K., Shanmugalatha, A., et al. (2024) · doi:10.1109/icietdw61607.2024.10939895
“The Clinical datasets, which consist of 1200 pairs of cine 2D stack-axis (SAX) and cine 3D high resolution (HR) cardiac MR images, have been described by Oktay et al. (2017) [3].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Oktay, O., Ferrante, E., Kamnitsas, K., Heinrich, M., Bai, W., Caballero, J., Cook, S. A., de Marvao, A., Dawes, T., O'Regan, D. P., Kainz, B., Glocker, B., & Rueckert, D.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 384-395
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-254X
- OpenAlex
- W2620296437
- Semantic Scholar
- 33f7b95903eeefdde37fabf9655b4de089d53bd2
- Cited by
- 751
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 135 · 2020: 118 · 2019: 119 · 2018: 47
- FWCI
- 32.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- EPSRC Program (EP/P001009/1)
- British Heart Foundation, U.K. (PG/12/27/29489)
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre-based at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- anatomical prior knowledge, cardiac image segmentation, biomarkers, artifact reduction
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Heart, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cardiomyopathies, Databases, Factual, Neural Networks, Computer, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Cardiac Imaging Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review