The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Convolutional Neural Network Based Metal Artifact Reduction in X-Ray Computed Tomography
Open accessAbstract
In the presence of metal implants, metal artifacts are introduced to x-ray computed tomography CT images. Although a large number of metal artifact reduction (MAR) methods have been proposed in the past decades, MAR is still one of the major problems in clinical x-ray CT. In this paper, we develop a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based open MAR framework, which fuses the information from the original and corrected images to suppress artifacts. The proposed approach consists of two phases. In the CNN training phase, we build a database consisting of metal-free, metal-inserted and pre-corrected CT images, and image patches are extracted and used for CNN training. In the MAR phase, the uncorrected and pre-corrected images are used as the input of the trained CNN to generate a CNN image with reduced artifacts. To further reduce the remaining artifacts, water equivalent tissues in a CNN image are set to a uniform value to yield a CNN prior, whose forward projections are used to replace the metal-affected projections, followed by the FBP reconstruction. The effectiveness of the proposed method is validated on both simulated and real data. Experimental results demonstrate the superior MAR capability of the proposed method to its competitors in terms of artifact suppression and preservation of anatomical structures in the vicinity of metal implants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892
Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imaging
Jin, K. H., McCann, M. T., Froustey, E., & Unser, M. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2017.2713099 · Cited by 2,529
Cited by
Deep learning for tomographic image reconstruction
Wang, G., Ye, J. C., & De Man, B. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-00273-z · Cited by 531
Häggström, I., Schmidtlein, C. R., Campanella, G., & Fuchs, T. J. (2019) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2019.03.013 · Cited by 322
Prospects of Structural Similarity Index for Medical Image Analysis
Mudeng, V., Kim, M., & Choe, S.-W. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12083754 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Y., & Yu, H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1370-1381
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-254X
- OpenAlex
- W2753044865
- Cited by
- 493
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Convolutional Neural Network Based Metal Artifact Reduction in X-Ray Computed Tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmi.2018.2823083
- The paper
- Zhang, Y., & Yu, H. (2018). Convolutional Neural Network Based Metal Artifact Reduction in X-Ray Computed Tomography. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2018.2823083
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.