Cited by 153Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Large-Margin Multi-Modal Deep Learning for RGB-D Object Recognition

Wang, Anran, Lu, Jiwen, Cai, Jianfei, Cham, Tat-Jen, Wang, Gang·2015·IEEE Transactions on Multimedia

Abstract

Most existing feature learning-based methods for RGB-D object recognition either combine RGB and depth data in an undifferentiated manner from the outset, or learn features from color and depth separately, which do not adequately exploit different characteristics of the two modalities or utilize the shared relationship between the modalities. In this paper, we propose a general CNN-based multi-modal learning framework for RGB-D object recognition. We first construct deep CNN layers for color and depth separately, which are then connected with a carefully designed multi-modal layer. This layer is designed to not only discover the most discriminative features for each modality, but is also able to harness the complementary relationship between the two modalities. The results of the multi-modal layer are back-propagated to update parameters of the CNN layers, and the multi-modal feature learning and the back-propagation are iteratively performed until convergence. Experimental results on two widely used RGB-D object datasets show that our method for general multi-modal learning achieves comparable performance to state-of-the-art methods specifically designed for RGB-D data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmm.2015.2476655

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, A., Lu, J., Cai, J., Cham, T.-J., & Wang, G.
Affiliations
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
Published
2015-11
Volume
17
Issue
11
Pages
1887-1898
ISSN
  • 1520-9210 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0077
OpenAlex
W1922904362
Cited by
153
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2
FWCI
18.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Multimedia (publishedVersion)
Funders
Nanyang Technological University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
RGB-D object recognition, multimodal learning, large margin learning, representation learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review