Cited by 322Adaptive Dynamic Programming ControlReinforcement Learning in RoboticsAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems

Reinforcement learning-based optimal tracking control of an unknown unmanned surface vehicle

Wang, Ning, Gao, Ying, Zhao, Hong, Ahn, Choon Ki·2021·IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems

Abstract

In this article, a novel reinforcement learning-based optimal tracking control (RLOTC) scheme is established for an unmanned surface vehicle (USV) in the presence of complex unknowns, including dead-zone input nonlinearities, system dynamics, and disturbances. To be specific, dead-zone nonlinearities are decoupled to be input-dependent sloped controls and unknown biases that are encapsulated into lumped unknowns within tracking error dynamics. Neural network (NN) approximators are further deployed to adaptively identify complex unknowns and facilitate a Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation that formulates optimal tracking. In order to derive a practically optimal solution, an actor-critic reinforcement learning framework is built by employing adaptive NN identifiers to recursively approximate the total optimal policy and cost function. Eventually, theoretical analysis shows that the entire RLOTC scheme can render tracking errors that converge to an arbitrarily small neighborhood of the origin, subject to optimal cost. Simulation results and comprehensive comparisons on a prototype USV demonstrate remarkable effectiveness and superiority.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnnls.2020.3009214

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, N., Gao, Y., Zhao, H., & Ahn, C. K.
Affiliations
  • Dalian Maritime University (CN)
  • Korea University (KR)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
Published
2021-07
Volume
32
Issue
7
Pages
3034-3045
ISSN
  • 2162-237X (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-2388
OpenAlex
W3047221759
Cited by
322
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 4
FWCI
16.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51009017, 51379002)
  • Fund for Liaoning Innovative Talents in Colleges and Universities, China (LR2017024)
  • Fund for Dalian Distinguished Young Scholars, China (2016RJ10)
  • Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program (XLYC1807013)
  • Stable Supporting Fund of Science and Technology on Underwater Vehicle Laboratory, China (SXJQR2018WDKT03)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China (3132019344)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
  • Korean Government (NRF-2020R1A2C1005449)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Keywords
unmanned surface vehicles, optimal tracking control, reinforcement learning, dead-zone nonlinearity, unknown dynamics, disturbance compensation, Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation, actor-critic, neural network identifier, adaptive identification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review