Cited by 17Hydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsDynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems

Optimized-Based Fault-Tolerant Control of an Electro-Hydraulic System with Disturbance Rejection

Open access
Phan, Van Du, Ahn, Kyoung Kwan·2022·Applied Sciences

Abstract

In this article, the design and implementation of a fault-tolerant controller are proposed for an electro-hydraulic actuator (EHA) in the presence of disturbances and actuator faults. The existence of nonlinearities, uncertainties, and a bias fault (i.e., internal leakage fault) in the system dynamics significantly decreases the desired performance. The nonlinear disturbance observers (NDO) are constructed to handle the adverse influences caused by the above disadvantages. The whole fault-tolerant control (FTC) scheme consists of two design loops: an inner force control loop and an outer position control loop. The inner loop is based on an optimized backstepping framework to achieve the optimal performance, whilst the problem of uncertainties and disturbances is dealt with using a terminal sliding mode directly designed from the position tracking error. It is shown by theoretical analysis that system stability is ensured under faulty conditions. Finally, simulation results and comparison studies are conducted to further verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app12189197

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phan, V. D., & Ahn, K. K.
Affiliations
University of Ulsan (KR)
Corresponding author
Ahn, Kyoung Kwan
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-09-14
Volume
12
Issue
18
Pages
9197
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4295797390
Cited by
17
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Basic Science Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) (2020R1A2B5B03001480, 2021RIS-003)
  • Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea (2020R1A2B5B03001480, 2021RIS-003)
  • Regional Innovation Strategy (RIS) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) (2020R1A2B5B03001480, 2021RIS-003)
  • Ministry of Education (MOE) (2020R1A2B5B03001480, 2021RIS-003)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
Keywords
fault-tolerant control, electro-hydraulic actuator, disturbance rejection, nonlinear disturbance observer, actuator faults, backstepping control, terminal sliding mode, location tracking, force control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review