The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Hybrid Deep Learning-Based Model for Anomaly Detection in Cloud Datacenter Networks
Open accessAbstract
With the emergence of the Internet-of-Things (IoT) and seamless Internet connectivity, the need to process streaming data on real-time basis has become essential. However, the existing data stream management systems are not efficient in analyzing the network log big data for real-time anomaly detection. Further, the existing anomaly detection approaches are not proficient because they cannot be applied to networks, are computationally complex, and suffer from high false positives. Thus, in this paper a hybrid data processing model for network anomaly detection is proposed that leverages grey wolf optimization (GWO) and convolutional neural network (CNN). To enhance the capabilities of the proposed model, GWO and CNN learning approaches were enhanced with: 1) improved exploration, exploitation, and initial population generation abilities and 2) revamped dropout functionality, respectively. These extended variants are referred to as Improved-GWO (ImGWO) and Improved-CNN (ImCNN). The proposed model works in two phases for efficient network anomaly detection. In the first phase, ImGWO is used for feature selection in order to obtain an optimal trade-off between two objectives, i.e., reduced error rate and feature-set minimization. In the second phase, ImCNN is used for network anomaly classification. The efficacy of the proposed model is validated on benchmark (DARPA'98 and KDD'99) and synthetic datasets. The results obtained demonstrate that the proposed cloud-based anomaly detection model is superior in comparison to the other state-of-the-art models (used for network anomaly detection), in terms of accuracy, detection rate, false positive rate, and F-score. In average, the proposed model exhibits an overall improvement of 8.25%, 4.08%, and 3.62% in terms of detection rate, false positives, and accuracy, respectively; relative to standard GWO with CNN.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S. M., & Lewis, A. (2014) · Advances in Engineering Software · doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007 · Cited by 19,343
A survey of network anomaly detection techniques
Ahmed, M., Naser Mahmood, A., & Hu, J. (2016) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2015.11.016 · Cited by 1,750
Particle swarm optimization for feature selection in classification: a multi-objective approach
Xue, B., Zhang, M., & Browne, W. N. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2012.2227469 · Cited by 1,282
A survey of intrusion detection techniques in Cloud
Modi, C., Patel, D., Borisaniya, B., Patel, H., Patel, A., & Rajarajan, M. (2013) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2012.05.003 · Cited by 889
A hybrid PSO-GA algorithm for constrained optimization problems
Garg, H. (2016) · Applied Mathematics and Computation · doi:10.1016/j.amc.2015.11.001 · Cited by 655
An Intrusion Detection Model Based on Feature Reduction and Convolutional Neural Networks
Xiao, Y., Xing, C., Zhang, T., & Zhao, Z. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2904620 · Cited by 383
A System for Denial-of-Service Attack Detection Based on Multivariate Correlation Analysis
Tan, Z., Jamdagni, A., He, X., Nanda, P., & Liu, R. P. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2013.146 · Cited by 314
Innovative Computational Intelligence: A Rough Guide to 134 Clever Algorithms
Xing, B., & Gao, W.-J. (2014) · Intelligent Systems Reference Library · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-03404-1 · Cited by 279
McPAD: A multiple classifier system for accurate payload-based anomaly detection
Perdisci, R., Ariu, D., Fogla, P., Giacinto, G., & Lee, W. (2009) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2008.11.011 · Cited by 269
Garg, S., Kaur, K., Kumar, N., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2019.2893549 · Cited by 268
Self-citation
Cited by
Asharf, J., Moustafa, N., Khurshid, H., Debie, E., Haider, W., & Wahab, A. (2020) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics9071177 · Cited by 378
Using the internet of things in smart energy systems and networks
Ahmad, T., & Zhang, D. (2021) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.102783 · Cited by 332
Akinola, O., Akinola, A., Victor Ifeanyi, I., Oyerinde, O., Joseph Adewole, O., Sulaimon, B., & Sulaimon, B. (2024) · International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) · doi:10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24mar1231 · Cited by 283
A Deep Learning-based Cryptocurrency Price Prediction Scheme for Financial Institutions
Patel, M. M., Tanwar, S., Gupta, R., & Kumar, N. (2020) · Journal of Information Security and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jisa.2020.102583 · Cited by 282
Self-citationA Unified Deep Learning Anomaly Detection and Classification Approach for Smart Grid Environments
Siniosoglou, I., Radoglou-Grammatikis, P., Efstathopoulos, G., Fouliras, P., & Sarigiannidis, P. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2021.3078381 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Garg, S., Kaur, K., Kumar, N., Kaddoum, G., Zomaya, A. Y., & Ranjan, R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 924-935
- ISSN
- 1932-4537 (ISSN-L)
- 2373-7379
- OpenAlex
- W2959716986
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 21.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Hybrid Deep Learning-Based Model for Anomaly Detection in Cloud Datacenter Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tnsm.2019.2927886
- The paper
- Garg, S., Kaur, K., Kumar, N., Kaddoum, G., Zomaya, A. Y., & Ranjan, R. (2019). A Hybrid Deep Learning-Based Model for Anomaly Detection in Cloud Datacenter Networks. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsm.2019.2927886
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.