MNO-OTT Collaborative Video Streaming in 5G: The Zero-Rated QoE Approach for Quality and Resource Management
Open accessAbstract
The Quality of Experience (QoE) management procedures for multimedia services benefit from an effective collaboration between the Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) and the Over-The-Top (OTT) service providers as the former can allocate the appropriate network resources to the users and the latter has access to key influence factors for having a proper view of the provided QoE. One successful collaboration model is the zero-rated data rate approach, according to which the MNO limits the data rate of the users towards the collaborating OTT applications with the benefit for the user that the generated traffic is not counted in her monthly contract data limit. Accordingly, the MNO may reduce the network congestion, and the users are encouraged to select the collaborating OTT applications. Though, this approach does not consider the resulting QoE, which may vary significantly from one user to another even if the same throughput is given. Based on this consideration, in this paper, we proposed the zero-rated QoE approach, according to which the limit is introduced in terms of QoE rather than throughput. This clearly requires a stronger collaboration between the OTT and the MNO, as the first has to give access to the second to quality influence factors and the latter to allocate resources according to the predicted QoE. The contributions of this paper are: the introduction of the novel zero-rated QoE approach with particular reference to video streaming services; the definition of novel components in the 3GPP architecture so that this approach can be introduced; the definition of the algorithm for the allocation of the appropriate radio resources to each user; a simulation analysis where the proposed approach is compared with respect to the former zero-rated approach, which shows significant improvements in terms of average provided quality and quality fairness at the same overall throughput.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A study in [244] proposes a 5G network architecture for the network and service management of multimedia services by passive monitoring probe at the user terminal for exchange of information between OTTP and MNO.
“Similary, the study conducted in [244] proposes 5G network architecture for the network and service management of the multimedia services by passive monitoring probe at the user terminal for exchange of information between OTTP and MNO.”
From QoE Management of Multimedia Streaming Services in Future Networks: A Tutorial and Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [244]
The zero-rate QoE approach for radio resource management in 5G networks considering multimedia services outperforms the traditional zero-rated data rate approach in terms of network resource utilization, delivered QoE and QoE-aware fairness.
“The approach outperforms the traditional zerorated data rate approach in terms of the network resource utilization, delivered QoE and QoE-aware fairness.”
From QoE Management of Multimedia Streaming Services in Future Networks: A Tutorial and Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [244]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
A Data-Driven Architecture for Personalized QoE Management in 5G Wireless Networks
Wang, Y., Li, P., Jiao, L., Su, Z., Cheng, N., Shen, X. S., & Zhang, P. (2017) · IEEE Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/mwc.2016.1500184wc · Cited by 125 · see citing works
OTT-ISP joint service management: A Customer Lifetime Value based approach
Ahmad, A., Floris, A., & Atzori, L. (2017) · 2017 IFIP/IEEE Symposium on Integrated Network and Service Management (IM) · doi:10.23919/inm.2017.7987431 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
QoE Management of Multimedia Streaming Services in Future Networks: A Tutorial and Survey
Barakabitze, A. A., Barman, N., Ahmad, A., Zadtootaghaj, S., Sun, L., Martini, M. G., & Atzori, L. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2958784 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Ahmad, A., & Atzori, L.
- Affiliations
- IS-Wireless (Poland) (PL)
- University of Cagliari (IT)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 361-374
- ISSN
- 1932-4537 (ISSN-L)
- 2373-7379
- OpenAlex
- W2974224712
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 2.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- ieeexplore.ieee.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management (publishedVersion)
- UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (643072)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Traffic and Congestion Control
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Legal Systems and Institutions
- Keywords
- mobile operators, over-the-top services, video streaming, 5G, radio resource allocation, data rate limits
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review