Cited by 125Image and Video Quality AssessmentAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G

A Data-Driven Architecture for Personalized QoE Management in 5G Wireless Networks

Wang, Ying, Li, Peilong, Jiao, Lei, Su, Zhou, Cheng, Nan, Shen, Xuemin Sherman, Zhang, Ping·2017·IEEE Wireless Communications

Abstract

With the emergence of a variety of new wireless network types, business types, and QoS in a more autonomic, diverse, and interactive manner, it is envisioned that a new era of personalized services has arrived, which emphasizes users' requirements and service experiences. As a result, users' QoE will become one of the key features in 5G/future networks. In this article, we first review the state of the art of QoE research from several perspectives, including definition, influencing factors, assessment methods, QoE models, and control methods. Then a data-driven architecture for enhancing personalized QoE is proposed for 5G networks. Under this architecture, we specifically propose a two-step QoE modeling approach to capture the strength of the relationship between users and services. Thereafter, the preferences of a user is introduced to model the user's subjectivity toward a specific service. With the comprehension of users' preferences, radio resources can be distributed more precisely. Simulation results show that overall QoE can be enhanced by 20 percent, while 96 percent of users have an improved QoE, which validates the efficiency of the proposed architecture.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mwc.2016.1500184wc

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The main challenges with regards to QoE optimization and control may be summarized in the answers to four questions: what key quality parameters to optimize and control; where to control; when to perform QoE optimization and control; and how often to control and optimize QoE.

    “As stated in [8], the main challenges that arise with regards to QoE optimization and control may be summarized in the answers to the following four questions: (1) What key quality parameters to optimize and control? (2) Where to control (e.g., at the client, server and the network side)? (3) When to perform QoE optimization and control (e.g., during the service, that is, on-line control or in an”
  • Recent efforts exploring QoE management using SDN and/or NFV are limited by a limited review and discussion of standardization activities related to SDN and/or NFV.

    “Although recent efforts explore the QoE management aspects using SDN and/or NFV, we note that these works are limited in at least one of the following: 1) limited review and discussion of the standardization activities related to SDN and/or NFV;”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Y., Li, P., Jiao, L., Su, Z., Cheng, N., Shen, X. S., & Zhang, P.
Affiliations
  • Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
  • University of Agder (NO)
  • Shanghai University (CN)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
Venue
IEEE Wireless Communications
Published
2017-02
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
102-110
ISSN
1536-1284 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2556076181
Cited by
125
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
10.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Wireless Communications (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Wireless Network Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
Keywords
quality of experience, 5G, data-driven architecture, user preferences, QoE modeling, radio resource allocation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review