The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
IoT-KEEPER: Detecting Malicious IoT Network Activity Using Online Traffic Analysis at the Edge
Open accessAbstract
IoT devices are notoriously vulnerable even to trivial attacks and can be easily compromised. In addition, resource constraints and heterogeneity of IoT devices make it impractical to secure IoT installations using traditional endpoint and network security solutions. To address this problem, we present IoT-Keeper, a lightweight system which secures the communication of IoT. IoT-Keeper uses our proposed anomaly detection technique to perform traffic analysis at edge gateways. It uses a combination of fuzzy C-means clustering and fuzzy interpolation scheme to analyze network traffic and detect malicious network activity. Once malicious activity is detected, IoT-Keeper automatically enforces network access restrictions against IoT device generating this activity, and prevents it from attacking other devices or services. We have evaluated IoT-Keeper using a comprehensive dataset, collected from a real-world testbed, containing popular IoT devices. Using this dataset, our proposed technique achieved high accuracy (≈0.98) and low false positive rate (≈0.02) for detecting malicious network activity. Our evaluation also shows that IoT-Keeper has low resource footprint, and it can detect and mitigate various network attacks-without requiring explicit attack signatures or sophisticated hardware.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating the Number of Clusters in a Data Set Via the Gap Statistic
Tibshirani, R., Walther, G., & Hastie, T. (2001) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00293 · Cited by 6,205
NbClust : An R Package for Determining the Relevant Number of Clusters in a Data Set
Charrad, M., Ghazzali, N., Boiteau, V., & Niknafs, A. (2014) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v061.i06 · Cited by 3,396
DeepLog: Anomaly Detection and Diagnosis from System Logs through Deep Learning
Du, M., Li, F., Zheng, G., & Srikumar, V. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3133956.3134015 · Cited by 1,835
Using an IoT platform for trustworthy D2D communications in a real indoor environment
Nitti, M., Popescu, V., & Fadda, M. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2018.2885043 · Cited by 32
Cited by
IoT anomaly detection methods and applications: A survey
Chatterjee, A., & Ahmed, B. S. (2022) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2022.100568 · Cited by 323
A Unified Deep Learning Anomaly Detection and Classification Approach for Smart Grid Environments
Siniosoglou, I., Radoglou-Grammatikis, P., Efstathopoulos, G., Fouliras, P., & Sarigiannidis, P. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2021.3078381 · Cited by 266
LITNET-2020: An Annotated Real-World Network Flow Dataset for Network Intrusion Detection
Damasevicius, R., Venckauskas, A., Grigaliunas, S., Toldinas, J., Morkevicius, N., Aleliunas, T., & Smuikys, P. (2020) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics9050800 · Cited by 132
Saheed, Y. K., Omole, A. I., & Sabit, M. O. (2025) · Sensors International · doi:10.1016/j.sintl.2024.100297 · Cited by 88
MUD-based behavioral profiling security framework for software-defined IoT networks
Krishnan, P., Jain, K., Buyya, R., Vijayakumar, P., Nayyar, A., Bilal, M., & Song, H. (2022) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2021.3113577 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Hafeez, I., Antikainen, M., Ding, A. Y., & Tarkoma, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-59
- ISSN
- 1932-4537 (ISSN-L)
- 2373-7379
- OpenAlex
- W2999613521
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 14.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: IoT-KEEPER: Detecting Malicious IoT Network Activity Using Online Traffic Analysis at the Edge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tnsm.2020.2966951
- The paper
- Hafeez, I., Antikainen, M., Ding, A. Y., & Tarkoma, S. (2020). IoT-KEEPER: Detecting Malicious IoT Network Activity Using Online Traffic Analysis at the Edge. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsm.2020.2966951
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.