The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conversion of EEG activity into cursor movement by a brain-computer interface (BCI)
Abstract
The Wadsworth electroencephalogram (EEG)-based brain-computer interface (BCI) uses amplitude in mu or beta frequency bands over sensorimotor cortex to control cursor movement. Trained users can move the cursor in one or two dimensions. The primary goal of this research is to provide a new communication and control option for people with severe motor disabilities. Currently, cursor movements in each dimension are determined 10 times/s by an empirically derived linear function of one or two EEG features (i.e., spectral bands from different electrode locations). This study used offline analysis of data collected during system operation to explore methods for improving the accuracy of cursor movement. The data were gathered while users selected among three possible targets by controlling vertical [i.e., one-dimensional (1-D)] cursor movement. The three methods analyzed differ in the dimensionality of the cursor movement [1-D versus two-dimensional (2-D)] and in the type of the underlying function (linear versus nonlinear). We addressed two questions: Which method is best for classification (i.e., to determine from the EEG which target the user wants to hit)? How does the number of EEG features affect the performance of each method? All methods reached their optimal performance with 10-20 features. In offline simulation, the 2-D linear method and the 1-D nonlinear method improved performance significantly over the 1-D linear method. The 1-D linear method did not do so. These offline results suggest that the 1-D nonlinear or the 2-D linear cursor function will improve online operation of the BCI system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition
Bishop, C. M. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001 · Cited by 12,287
Cited by
Bashashati, A., Fatourechi, M., Ward, R. K., & Birch, G. E. (2007) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/4/2/r03 · Cited by 907
Toward Brain-Computer Interfacing
(2007) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7493.001.0001 · Cited by 785
Chang, C.-Y., Hsu, S.-H., Pion-Tonachini, L., & Jung, T.-P. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2019.2930186 · Cited by 544
The wadsworth BCI research and development program: at home with BCI
Vaughan, T. M., McFarland, D. J., Schalk, G., Sarnacki, W. A., Krusienski, D. J., Sellers, E. W., & Wolpaw, J. R. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2006.875577 · Cited by 334
Self-citationLotte, F. (2015) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2015.2404941 · Cited by 327
Metadata
- Authors
- Fabiani, G. E., McFarland, D. J., Wolpaw, J. R., & Pfurtscheller, G.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 331-338
- ISSN
- 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0210
- OpenAlex
- W2113019943
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conversion of EEG activity into cursor movement by a brain-computer interface (BCI). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tnsre.2004.834627
- The paper
- Fabiani, G. E., McFarland, D. J., Wolpaw, J. R., & Pfurtscheller, G. (2004). Conversion of EEG activity into cursor movement by a brain-computer interface (BCI). IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsre.2004.834627
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.