Cited by 443Muscle activation and electromyography studiesProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

Quantifying Pattern Recognition—Based Myoelectric Control of Multifunctional Transradial Prostheses

Open access
Li, Guanglin, Schultz, Aimee E., Kuiken, Todd A.·2010·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Abstract

We evaluated real-time myoelectric pattern recognition control of a virtual arm by transradial amputees. Five unilateral patients performed 10 wrist and hand movements using their amputated and intact arms. In order to demonstrate the value of information from intrinsic hand muscles, this data was included in EMG recordings from the intact arm. With both arms, motions were selected in approximately 0.2 s on average, and completed in less than 1.25 s. Approximately 99% of wrist movements were completed using either arm; however, the completion rate of hand movements was significantly lower for the amputated arm (53.9% +/- 14.2%) than for the intact arm ( 69.4% +/- 13.1%). For the amputated arm, average classification accuracy for only 6 movements-including a single hand grasp-was 93.1% +/- 4.1%, compared to 84.4% +/- 7.2% for all 10 movements. Use of 6 optimally-placed electrodes only reduced this accuracy to 91.5% +/- 4.9%. These results suggest that muscles in the residual forearm produce sufficient myoelectric information for real-time wrist control, but not for performing multiple hand grasps. The outcomes of this study could aid the development of a practical multifunctional myoelectric prosthesis for transradial amputees, and suggest that increased EMG information-such as made available through targeted muscle reinnervation-could improve control of these prostheses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnsre.2009.2039619

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • That approach gave usable signal amplitude and allowed some prosthetic limb control in transradial amputees.

    “This strategy has provided reasonable signal amplitude and some control of a prosthetic limb in patients undergoing transradial amputations (24–28).”

    From A regenerative peripheral nerve interface allows real-time control of an artificial hand in upper limb amputees (2020) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Introduction says powered transradial prostheses use forearm EMG signal amplitudes for limited control. The Abstract reports that five transradial amputees used residual-forearm signals to control a virtual arm, but the Discussion explicitly says they did not test a physical prosthesis. The paper does not establish a particular ‘reasonable’ signal amplitude. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Earlier studies obtained prosthetic control signals by connecting to intact residual-limb muscles.

    “In previous studies, investigators have provided prosthetic control signals by interfacing with intact muscles in the residual limb.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, G., Schultz, A. E., & Kuiken, T. A.
Affiliations
  • Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Published
2010-04
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
185-192
ISSN
  • 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0210
OpenAlex
W2096553993
Cited by
443
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 22
FWCI
19.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Northwestern University
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hd058000-05, 5r01hd043137-05)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01-HD-05-8000, R01 HD-043137)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
myoelectric control, transradial amputation, pattern recognition, EMG signal classification, virtual arm, wrist kinematics, hand grasp, electrode placement, targeted muscle reinnervation
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Amputation, Surgical, Arm, Artificial Limbs, Electrodes, Implanted, Forearm, Hand, Humans, Learning, Middle Aged, Motion, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Pilot Projects, Prosthesis Design, Radius, Wrist, Muscle, Skeletal, Hand Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review