Cited by 180EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyMuscle activation and electromyography studies

Autocalibration and recurrent adaptation: Towards a plug and play online ERD-BCI

Open access
Faller, Josef, Vidaurre, Carmen, Solis-Escalante, Teodoro, Neuper, Christa, Scherer, Reinhold·2012·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Abstract

System calibration and user training are essential for operating motor imagery based brain-computer interface (BCI) systems. These steps are often unintuitive and tedious for the user, and do not necessarily lead to a satisfactory level of control. We present an Adaptive BCI framework that provides feedback after only minutes of autocalibration in a two-class BCI setup. During operation, the system recurrently reselects only one out of six predefined logarithmic bandpower features (10-13 and 16-24 Hz from Laplacian derivations over C3, Cz, and C4), specifically, the feature that exhibits maximum discriminability. The system then retrains a linear discriminant analysis classifier on all available data and updates the online paradigm with the new model. Every retraining step is preceded by an online outlier rejection. Operating the system requires no engineering knowledge other than connecting the user and starting the system. In a supporting study, ten out of twelve novice users reached a criterion level of above 70% accuracy in one to three sessions (10-80 min online time) of training, with a median accuracy of 80.2 ± 11.3% in the last session. We consider the presented system a positive first step towards fully autocalibrating motor imagery BCIs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnsre.2012.2189584

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Direct evidence of learned SMR modulation at the BCI feature level is rare or incomplete, derived in able-bodied populations and not longitudinal.

    “Direct evidence of learned SMR modulation at the BCI feature level is, in fact, rare or incomplete, derived in able-bodied populations and not longitudinal [10,23,26,28,38–41].”
  • Other studies have reported emergence of SMR modulations, but given the short number of experimental sessions, the observed neurophysiological patterns might only be indicative of transitory effects rather than consolidated subject learning.

    “Other studies have reported emergence of such SMR modulations [26,28,38,39], but given the short number of experimental sessions they carried out, the observed neurophysiological patterns might only be indicative of transitory effects rather than consolidated subject learning.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Faller, J., Vidaurre, C., Solis-Escalante, T., Neuper, C., & Scherer, R.
Affiliations
  • Graz University of Technology (AT)
  • Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
  • University of Graz (AT)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Published
2012-05
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
313-319
ISSN
  • 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0210
OpenAlex
W2031130804
Cited by
180
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TECNALIA Publications (Fundación TECNALIA Research & Innovation) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
brain-computer interface, self-calibration, motor imagery, online retraining, linear discriminant analysis, outlier removal, plug and play, novice users
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Alpha Rhythm, Brain, Calibration, Cortical Synchronization, Cues, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Electric Stimulation, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Online Systems, Psychomotor Performance, User-Computer Interface, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review