Cited by 49EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyMuscle activation and electromyography studies

Context-aware adaptive spelling in motor imagery BCI

Open access
Perdikis, S, Leeb, R, Millán, J d R·2016·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

Objective. This work presents a first motor imagery-based, adaptive brain–computer interface (BCI) speller, which is able to exploit application-derived context for improved, simultaneous classifier adaptation and spelling. Online spelling experiments with ten able-bodied users evaluate the ability of our scheme, first, to alleviate non-stationarity of brain signals for restoring the subject’s performances, second, to guide naive users into BCI control avoiding initial offline BCI calibration and, third, to outperform regular unsupervised adaptation. Approach. Our co-adaptive framework combines the BrainTree speller with smooth-batch linear discriminant analysis adaptation. The latter enjoys contextual assistance through BrainTree’s language model to improve online expectation-maximization maximum-likelihood estimation. Main results. Our results verify the possibility to restore single-sample classification and BCI command accuracy, as well as spelling speed for expert users. Most importantly, context-aware adaptation performs significantly better than its unsupervised equivalent and similar to the supervised one. Although no significant differences are found with respect to the state-of-the-art PMean approach, the proposed algorithm is shown to be advantageous for 30% of the users. Significance. We demonstrate the possibility to circumvent supervised BCI recalibration, saving time without compromising the adaptation quality. On the other hand, we show that this type of classifier adaptation is not as efficient for BCI training purposes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2560/13/3/036018

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The authors' previous work reported a short-term decrease in feature discriminancy during adaptive spelling.

    “Our previous work has even reported a short-term decrease in feature discriminancy during adaptive spelling [29].”
  • Better BCI performance could be due to decoder recalibration, re-parameterizations of the BCI, and the application and adoption of better mental strategies, among other factors.

    “Better performance could be due to decoder recalibration [29], re-parameterizations of the BCI, and the application and adoption of better mental strategies [9,64,65], among other factors.”
  • Frequent or continuous recalibration, especially when accompanied by re-selecting the classifier's features, creates a situation in which the subject's learning could be hindered by the demand to adapt to a continuously changing decoder.

    “Frequent or continuous recalibration, especially in case it is accompanied by re-selecting the classifier’s features, creates a situation in which the subject’s learning could be hindered by the demand to adapt to a continuously changing decoder [29,70].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perdikis, S., Leeb, R., & Millán, J. D. R.
Affiliations
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
Perdikis, S
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2016-05-06
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
036018
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W2346898728
Cited by
49
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Hasler Stiftung
  • Seventh Framework Programme (FP7-224631 TOBI)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
motor imagery, brain-computer interface, contextual adaptation, classifier adaptation, linear discriminant analysis, language models, expectation-maximization algorithm
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Algorithms, Awareness, Communication Devices for People with Disabilities, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Reproducibility of Results, Discriminant Analysis, Brain-Computer Interfaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review