Cited by 57Urinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringUrinary Tract Infections Management

Estimation of Bladder Volume From Afferent Neural Activity

Mendez, Arnaldo, Sawan, Mohamad, Minagawa, Tomonori, Wyndaele, Jean-Jacques·2013·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Abstract

Refractive urinary dysfunction in individuals suffering from neurogenic bladder syndrome can be treated with implanted neurostimulators that restore, to some degree, the control of the urinary bladder. A sensor capable of relaying feedback from bladder activity to the implanted neurostimulator is required to implement a closed-loop system to improve overall implant efficacy and minimize deleterious effects to neural tissue caused by continuous electrical stimulation. In this paper, we present a method that allows real-time estimation of bladder volume from the primary afferent activity of bladder mechanoreceptors. Our method was validated with data acquired from anesthetized rats in acute experiments. It was possible to qualitatively estimate three states of bladder fullness in 100% of trials when the recorded afferent activity exhibited a Spearman's correlation coefficient of 0.6 or better. Furthermore, we could quantitatively estimate bladder volume, and also its pressure, using timeframes of properly chosen duration. The mean volume estimation error was 5.8 ±3.1%. Our results also demonstrate that it is possible to quantify both phasic and tonic bladder responses during slow filling and isovolumetric measurements, respectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnsre.2013.2266899

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mendez, A., Sawan, M., Minagawa, T., & Wyndaele, J.-J.
Affiliations
  • Polytechnique Montréal (CA)
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Published
2013-09
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
704-715
ISSN
  • 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0210
OpenAlex
W2139282073
Cited by
57
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
FWCI
7.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Polytechnique Montréal
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Urinary Tract Infections Management
Keywords
bladder volume estimation, neurogenic bladder, implanted neurostimulator, closed-loop neurostimulation, bladder pressure, urinary dysfunction, rat model
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Urinary Bladder, Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Electric Stimulation, Electrophysiology, Female, Mechanoreceptors, Models, Neurological, Monitoring, Physiologic, Neural Conduction, Neurons, Afferent, Sensation, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Nerve Fibers, Unmyelinated, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review