Cited by 1,376EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesEmotion and Mood RecognitionSleep and related disorders

DeepSleepNet: a model for automatic sleep stage scoring based on raw single-channel EEG

Open access
Supratak, Akara, Dong, Hao, Wu, Chao, Guo, Yike·2017·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Abstract

This paper proposes a deep learning model, named DeepSleepNet, for automatic sleep stage scoring based on raw single-channel EEG. Most of the existing methods rely on hand-engineered features, which require prior knowledge of sleep analysis. Only a few of them encode the temporal information, such as transition rules, which is important for identifying the next sleep stages, into the extracted features. In the proposed model, we utilize convolutional neural networks to extract time-invariant features, and bidirectional-long short-term memory to learn transition rules among sleep stages automatically from EEG epochs. We implement a two-step training algorithm to train our model efficiently. We evaluated our model using different single-channel EEGs (F4-EOG (left), Fpz-Cz, and Pz-Oz) from two public sleep data sets, that have different properties (e.g., sampling rate) and scoring standards (AASM and R&K). The results showed that our model achieved similar overall accuracy and macro F1-score (MASS: 86.2%-81.7, Sleep-EDF: 82.0%-76.9) compared with the state-of-the-art methods (MASS: 85.9%-80.5, Sleep-EDF: 78.9%-73.7) on both data sets. This demonstrated that, without changing the model architecture and the training algorithm, our model could automatically learn features for sleep stage scoring from different raw single-channel EEGs from different data sets without utilizing any hand-engineered features.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnsre.2017.2721116

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The small and large temporal filters in the MST block should be able to learn high and low-frequency patterns from the input, respectively.

    “The small and large temporal filters should be able to learn high and low-frequency patterns from the input, respectively (Supratak et al., 2017).”

    From A Lightweight Multi-Scale Convolutional Neural Network for P300 Decoding: Analysis of Training Strategies and Uncovering of Network Decision (2021) · cites this paper as Supratak et al., 2017

    Representation Learning (p. 2) says DeepSleepNet uses small and large filters, but describes the small filters as better at capturing when EEG patterns appear and the large filters as better at capturing frequency components. Model Specification (p. 3) repeats that distinction. Neither passage specifies high-frequency patterns for small filters or low-frequency patterns for large ones. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Supratak, A., Dong, H., Wu, C., & Guo, Y.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Published
2017-11
Volume
25
Issue
11
Pages
1998-2008
ISSN
  • 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0210
OpenAlex
W2604096629
Cited by
1,376
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 169 · 2025: 206 · 2024: 191 · 2023: 216 · 2022: 185 · 2021: 145 · 2020: 121 · 2019: 89 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 4
FWCI
41.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
single-channel EEG, bidirectional LSTM, convolutional neural networks, EEG feature extraction, Sleep-EDF, Mass, cross-dataset generalization
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Adult, Algorithms, Automation, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Neurological, Sleep Stages, Reproducibility of Results, Neural Networks, Computer, Polysomnography, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review