The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clustering ensembles: models of consensus and weak partitions
Abstract
Clustering ensembles have emerged as a powerful method for improving both the robustness as well as the stability of unsupervised classification solutions. However, finding a consensus clustering from multiple partitions is a difficult problem that can be approached from graph-based, combinatorial, or statistical perspectives. This study extends previous research on clustering ensembles in several respects. First, we introduce a unified representation for multiple clusterings and formulate the corresponding categorical clustering problem. Second, we propose a probabilistic model of consensus using a finite mixture of multinomial distributions in a space of clusterings. A combined partition is found as a solution to the corresponding maximum-likelihood problem using the EM algorithm. Third, we define a new consensus function that is related to the classical intraclass variance criterion using the generalized mutual information definition. Finally, we demonstrate the efficacy of combining partitions generated by weak clustering algorithms that use data projections and random data splits. A simple explanatory model is offered for the behavior of combinations of such weak clustering components. Combination accuracy is analyzed as a function of several parameters that control the power and resolution of component partitions as well as the number of partitions. We also analyze clustering ensembles with incomplete information and the effect of missing cluster labels on the quality of overall consensus. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods on several real-world data sets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Jain, A. K., Murty, M. N., & Flynn, P. J. (1999) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/331499.331504 · Cited by 13,199
Self-citationRUBIN, D. B. (1976) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/63.3.581 · Cited by 9,925
Algorithms for Clustering Data
Sarle, W. S. (1990) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1990.10484648 · Cited by 7,865
The random subspace method for constructing decision forests
Ho, T. K. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.709601 · Cited by 6,842
Algorithms for clustering data
Flury, B. (1989) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/0378-3758(89)90033-5 · Cited by 6,432
Combinatorial Optimization: Algorithms and Complexity.
Johnson, D. S., Papadimitriou, C. H., & Steiglitz, K. (1984) · The American Mathematical Monthly · doi:10.2307/2322374 · Cited by 5,942
A Fast and High Quality Multilevel Scheme for Partitioning Irregular Graphs
Karypis, G., & Kumar, V. (1998) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/s1064827595287997 · Cited by 5,762
On the Optimality of the Simple Bayesian Classifier under Zero-One Loss
Domingos, P., & Pazzani, M. (1997) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007413511361 · Cited by 3,101
Automatic subspace clustering of high dimensional data for data mining applications
Agrawal, R., Gehrke, J., Gunopulos, D., & Raghavan, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the 1998 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/276304.276314 · Cited by 2,412
Cited by
Community detection in networks: a user guide
Fortunato, S., & Hric, D. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.09.002 · Cited by 2,086
A Comprehensive Survey of Clustering Algorithms
Xu, D., & Tian, Y. (2015) · Annals of Data Science · doi:10.1007/s40745-015-0040-1 · Cited by 1,939
Locally Weighted Ensemble Clustering
Huang, D., Wang, C.-D., & Lai, J.-H. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2017.2702343 · Cited by 371
Multiobjective Optimization in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
Handl, J., Kell, D. B., & Knowles, J. (2007) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2007.070203 · Cited by 308
BETZEL, R. F., GRIFFA, A., AVENA-KOENIGSBERGER, A., GOÑI, J., THIRAN, J.-P., HAGMANN, P., & SPORNS, O. (2013) · Network Science · doi:10.1017/nws.2013.19 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Topchy, A., Jain, A. K., & Punch, W.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1866-1881
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2115346774
- Cited by
- 675
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 23.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clustering ensembles: models of consensus and weak partitions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpami.2005.237
- The paper
- Topchy, A., Jain, A. K., & Punch, W. (2005). Clustering ensembles: models of consensus and weak partitions. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2005.237
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.