The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Data driven image models through continuous joint alignment
Abstract
This paper presents a family of techniques that we call congealing for modeling image classes from data. The idea is to start with a set of images and make them appear as similar as possible by removing variability along the known axes of variation. This technique can be used to eliminate "nuisance" variables such as affine deformations from handwritten digits or unwanted bias fields from magnetic resonance images. In addition to separating and modeling the latent images-i.e., the images without the nuisance variables-we can model the nuisance variables themselves, leading to factorized generative image models. When nuisance variable distributions are shared between classes, one can share the knowledge learned in one task with another task, leading to efficient learning. We demonstrate this process by building a handwritten digit classifier from just a single example of each class. In addition to applications in handwritten character recognition, we describe in detail the application of bias removal from magnetic resonance images. Unlike previous methods, we use a separate, nonparametric model for the intensity values at each pixel. This allows us to leverage the data from the MR images of different patients to remove bias from each other. Only very weak assumptions are made about the distributions of intensity values in the images. In addition to the digit and MR applications, we discuss a number of other uses of congealing and describe experiments about the robustness and consistency of the method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Elements of Information Theory
Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (2005) · doi:10.1002/047174882x · Cited by 13,791
Cootes, T. F., Edwards, G. J., & Taylor, C. J. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.927467 · Cited by 5,409
Cited by
A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration
Avants, B. B., Tustison, N. J., Song, G., Cook, P. A., Klein, A., & Gee, J. C. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.025 · Cited by 4,796
The optimal template effect in hippocampus studies of diseased populations
Avants, B. B., Yushkevich, P., Pluta, J., Minkoff, D., Korczykowski, M., Detre, J., & Gee, J. C. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.062 · Cited by 640
Sullivan, E. V., Rohlfing, T., & Pfefferbaum, A. (2010) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.04.007 · Cited by 346
Bioimage informatics: a new area of engineering biology
Peng, H. (2008) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn346 · Cited by 346
Unsupervised Joint Alignment of Complex Images
Huang, G. B., Jain, V., & Learned-Miller, E. (2007) · 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2007.4408858 · Cited by 339
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Learned-Miller, E. G.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 236-250
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137821246
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Data driven image models through continuous joint alignment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpami.2006.34
- The paper
- Learned-Miller, E. G. (2006). Data driven image models through continuous joint alignment. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2006.34
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.