Cited by 591Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningMachine Learning and AlgorithmsMachine Learning and Data Classification

Domain Adaptation Problems: A DASVM Classification Technique and a Circular Validation Strategy

Bruzzone, L., Marconcini, M.·2010·IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Abstract

This paper addresses pattern classification in the framework of domain adaptation by considering methods that solve problems in which training data are assumed to be available only for a source domain different (even if related) from the target domain of (unlabeled) test data. Two main novel contributions are proposed: 1) a domain adaptation support vector machine (DASVM) technique which extends the formulation of support vector machines (SVMs) to the domain adaptation framework and 2) a circular indirect accuracy assessment strategy for validating the learning of domain adaptation classifiers when no true labels for the target--domain instances are available. Experimental results, obtained on a series of two-dimensional toy problems and on two real data sets related to brain computer interface and remote sensing applications, confirmed the effectiveness and the reliability of both the DASVM technique and the proposed circular validation strategy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpami.2009.57

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bruzzone, L., & Marconcini, M.
Affiliations
University of Trento (IT)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
2010-05
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
770-787
ISSN
0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159570078
Cited by
591
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 21
FWCI
11.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
domain adaptation, support vector machine, classifier validation, unlabeled target data, brain-computer interface, remote sensing, cross-domain classification
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Simulation, Models, Theoretical, Pattern Recognition, Automated

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review