The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Discriminative Latent Models for Recognizing Contextual Group Activities
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we go beyond recognizing the actions of individuals and focus on group activities. This is motivated from the observation that human actions are rarely performed in isolation; the contextual information of what other people in the scene are doing provides a useful cue for understanding high-level activities. We propose a novel framework for recognizing group activities which jointly captures the group activity, the individual person actions, and the interactions among them. Two types of contextual information, group-person interaction and person-person interaction, are explored in a latent variable framework. In particular, we propose three different approaches to model the person-person interaction. One approach is to explore the structures of person-person interaction. Differently from most of the previous latent structured models, which assume a predefined structure for the hidden layer, e.g., a tree structure, we treat the structure of the hidden layer as a latent variable and implicitly infer it during learning and inference. The second approach explores person-person interaction in the feature level. We introduce a new feature representation called the action context (AC) descriptor. The AC descriptor encodes information about not only the action of an individual person in the video, but also the behavior of other people nearby. The third approach combines the above two. Our experimental results demonstrate the benefit of using contextual information for disambiguating group activities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584
The pascal visual object classes (VOC) challenge
Everingham, M., Van Gool, L., Williams, C. K. I., Winn, J., & Zisserman, A. (2010) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-009-0275-4 · Cited by 19,599
Cited by
A Review of Human Activity Recognition Methods
Vrigkas, M., Nikou, C., & Kakadiaris, I. A. (2015) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2015.00028 · Cited by 566
Host–Parasite: Graph LSTM-in-LSTM for Group Activity Recognition
Shu, X., Zhang, L., Sun, Y., & Tang, J. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2020.2978942 · Cited by 258
Scene-Independent Group Profiling in Crowd
Shao, J., Loy, C. C., & Wang, X. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.285 · Cited by 254
Context-Aware Activity Recognition and Anomaly Detection in Video
Zhu, Y., Nayak, N. M., & Roy-Chowdhury, A. K. (2013) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2012.2234722 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Lan, T., Wang, Y., Yang, W., Robinovitch, S. N., & Mori, G.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1549-1562
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-9292
- OpenAlex
- W2047499569
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discriminative Latent Models for Recognizing Contextual Group Activities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpami.2011.228
- The paper
- Lan, T., Wang, Y., Yang, W., Robinovitch, S. N., & Mori, G. (2012). Discriminative Latent Models for Recognizing Contextual Group Activities. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2011.228
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.