Cited by 310Medical Imaging and AnalysisMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesAnatomy and Medical Technology

Multi-Scale Deep Reinforcement Learning for Real-Time 3D-Landmark Detection in CT Scans

Ghesu, Florin-Cristian, Georgescu, Bogdan, Zheng, Yefeng, Grbic, Sasa, Maier, Andreas, Hornegger, Joachim, Comaniciu, Dorin·2019·IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Abstract

Robust and fast detection of anatomical structures is a prerequisite for both diagnostic and interventional medical image analysis. Current solutions for anatomy detection are typically based on machine learning techniques that exploit large annotated image databases in order to learn the appearance of the captured anatomy. These solutions are subject to several limitations, including the use of suboptimal feature engineering techniques and most importantly the use of computationally suboptimal search-schemes for anatomy detection. To address these issues, we propose a method that follows a new paradigm by reformulating the detection problem as a behavior learning task for an artificial agent. We couple the modeling of the anatomy appearance and the object search in a unified behavioral framework, using the capabilities of deep reinforcement learning and multi-scale image analysis. In other words, an artificial agent is trained not only to distinguish the target anatomical object from the rest of the body but also how to find the object by learning and following an optimal navigation path to the target object in the imaged volumetric space. We evaluated our approach on 1487 3D-CT volumes from 532 patients, totaling over 500,000 image slices and show that it significantly outperforms state-of-the-art solutions on detecting several anatomical structures with no failed cases from a clinical acceptance perspective, while also achieving a 20-30 percent higher detection accuracy. Most importantly, we improve the detection-speed of the reference methods by 2-3 orders of magnitude, achieving unmatched real-time performance on large 3D-CT scans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpami.2017.2782687

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghesu, F.-C., Georgescu, B., Zheng, Y., Grbic, S., Maier, A., Hornegger, J., & Comaniciu, D.
Affiliations
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
  • Siemens (United States) (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
2019-01-01
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
176-189
ISSN
  • 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-9292
  • 1939-3539
OpenAlex
W2771590529
Cited by
310
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 7
FWCI
11.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
Keywords
anatomical structure detection, computed tomography, deep reinforcement learning, multiscale image analysis, real-time detection, object search, medical image analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review