Cited by 2,566Advanced Vision and ImagingAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 230 of the 232 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Event-Based Vision: A Survey

Open access
Gallego, Guillermo, Delbruck, Tobi, Orchard, Garrick, Bartolozzi, Chiara, Taba, Brian, Censi, Andrea, Leutenegger, Stefan, Davison, Andrew J., Conradt, Jorg, Daniilidis, Kostas, Scaramuzza, Davide·2022·IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Abstract

Event cameras are bio-inspired sensors that differ from conventional frame cameras: Instead of capturing images at a fixed rate, they asynchronously measure per-pixel brightness changes, and output a stream of events that encode the time, location and sign of the brightness changes. Event cameras offer attractive properties compared to traditional cameras: high temporal resolution (in the order of μs), very high dynamic range (140 dB versus 60 dB), low power consumption, and high pixel bandwidth (on the order of kHz) resulting in reduced motion blur. Hence, event cameras have a large potential for robotics and computer vision in challenging scenarios for traditional cameras, such as low-latency, high speed, and high dynamic range. However, novel methods are required to process the unconventional output of these sensors in order to unlock their potential. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the emerging field of event-based vision, with a focus on the applications and the algorithms developed to unlock the outstanding properties of event cameras. We present event cameras from their working principle, the actual sensors that are available and the tasks that they have been used for, from low-level vision (feature detection and tracking, optic flow, etc.) to high-level vision (reconstruction, segmentation, recognition). We also discuss the techniques developed to process events, including learning-based techniques, as well as specialized processors for these novel sensors, such as spiking neural networks. Additionally, we highlight the challenges that remain to be tackled and the opportunities that lie ahead in the search for a more efficient, bio-inspired way for machines to perceive and interact with the world.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpami.2020.3008413

Cites

230 of 230 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Items 201–230 of 230

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 232 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Delbruck, Neuromorphic vision sensing and processing, 7
  2. Lichtsteiner, 64 x 64 event-driven logarithmic temporal derivative silicon retina, 157
  3. Delbruck, V2E: From video frames to realistic DVS event camera streams, arXiv:2006.07722v1 · arXiv
  4. Berner, A 240x180 10mw 12$\mu$μs latency sparse-output vision sensor for mobile applications, C186
  5. Binas, DDD17: End-to-end DAVIS driving dataset, 1
  6. Szeliski, 2010, Computer Vision: Algorithms and Applications
  7. Kahneman, 2011, Thinking, Fast and Slow

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2,566

Metadata

Authors
Gallego, G., Delbruck, T., Orchard, G., Bartolozzi, C., Taba, B., Censi, A., Leutenegger, S., Davison, A. J., Conradt, J., Daniilidis, K., & Scaramuzza, D.
Affiliations
  • Einstein Center Digital Future (DE)
  • Intel (United States) (US)
  • Italian Institute of Technology (IT)
  • IBM (United States) (US)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
2022-01-01
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
154-180
ISSN
  • 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-9292
  • 1939-3539
OpenAlex
W3040838455
Cited by
2,566
References
232
Citations by year
2026: 553 · 2025: 648 · 2024: 510 · 2023: 363 · 2022: 258
FWCI
17.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • SNSF-ERC
  • Swiss National Science Foundation
  • National Center of Competence in Research Robotics
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Keywords
event cameras, event-based vision, bio-inspired sensors, high dynamic range, high temporal resolution, event processing, optical flow, 3D reconstruction, image segmentation, object recognition, spiking neural networks, low-power vision, robot vision
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Robotics, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review